Integration of interactive whiteboard in Swedish preschool practices

References

• Abrahamson, D. (2003). Text talk body talk table talk: A design of ratio and proportion as class-room parallel events (Vol. 2). Columbus, OH: Eric Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and EnvironmentalEducation.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, C. (2007). Hållpunkter för lärande: Småbarns möten med matematik. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, C. (2008). Bland bollar och klossar; Matematik för de yngsta i förskolan. Stockholm: Studentliterature.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, C. (2010). Broadening the horizon: Toddlers’ strategies for learning mathematics. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(1), 71–84. doi: 10.1080/09669761003661246
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, C. (2012). What counts when working with mathematics in a toddler-group? Early Years, 32(2), 215–228. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2011.652940
   Google Scholar
• Celik, S. (2012). Competency levels of teachers in using interactive whiteboards. Contemporary Educational Technology, 3(2), 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & DiBiase, A. M. (2003). Engaging young children in mathematics: Findings of the 2000 national conference on standards for preschool and kindergarten. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Doverborg, E. (2006). Dokumentation av lärarnde. In E. Doverborg & G. Emanuelsson (Eds.), Små barns matematik: Erfarenheter från ett pilotprojekt med barn 1–5 år och deras lärare (pp. 17–28). Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet och Nationalt Centrum för matematik.
   Google Scholar
• Doverborg, E., & Emanuelsson, G. (2006). Små barns matematik: Erfarenheter från ett pilotprojekt med barn 1–5 år och deras lärare. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet och Nationalt centrum för matematik.
   Google Scholar
• Doverborg, E., Pramling, N., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2013). Att undervisa förskolebrn. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Care, N., & Campuzano, L. (2007). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort report to congress. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and analogical reasoning in early childhood. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners (pp. 1–23). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development: Cultural-historical concepts in play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaubke, C. R. (2007). The effects of interactive media on preschoolers’ learning: A review of the research and recommendations for the future. Oakland, CA: Children Now.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern language: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning Media and Technology, 32(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/17439880601141146
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K. (2008). The impact of interactive multimedia on kindergarten students’ representations of fractions. Educational Research, 18(2), 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. (2007). Vygotsky goes online: Learning design from a socio-cultural perspective. Learning and Socio-cultural Theory: Exploring Modern Vygotskian Perspectives International Workshop 2007, 1(1). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/llrg/vol1/iss1/6
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3), 283–301.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3), 213–225. doi: 10.1080/17439880701511040
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, S., & Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard: A teacher's journey. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3), 271–282. doi:10.1080/17439880701511123
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Learning sciences, 4(1), 39–103. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, P. (2002). Teaching and learning primary mathematics: The impact of interactive whiteboards. North Islington Education Action Zone: BEAM research papers.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmen-tal study (PhD). Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Linderoth, J. (2010). Why gamers don't learn more: An ecological approach to games as learning environments. Paper presented in First Nordic DiGRA; Experiencing Games: Games, Play, and Players, August 16–17, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• McCarrick, K., & Li, X. (2007). Buried treasure: The impact of computer use on young children's social cognitive language development and motivation. AACE, 15(1), 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: A literature survey. In M. Thomas & E. C. Schmid (Eds.), Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory research and practice (pp. 1–19). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2005). Presentation and pedagogy: the effective use of interactive whiteboards in mathematics lessons. In D. Hewitt & A. Noyes (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth British congress of mathematics education held at the University of Warwick (pp. 105–112). Retrieved from www.bsrlm.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaãic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactivewhiteboards pedagogy and pupil performanceevaluation: An evaluation of the schools whiteboardexpansion (SWE) project (Vol. DfES Research Report RR 816). London: School of Educational Foundations and Policy Studies Institute of Education University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Pasnik, S., Bates, L., Townsend, E., Gallagher, L. P., Llorente, C., … Hupert, N. (2009). Preschool teachers can use a media-rich curriculum to prepare low-income children for school success: Results of a randomized controlled trial. New York: Education development.
   Google Scholar
• Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Sheridan, S. (2007). Lärandets grogrund – Perspektiv och förhållningssätt i förskolans läroplan. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C., & Mowbray, L. (2008). Use of SMART boards for teaching learning and assessment in kindergarten science. Teaching Science, 54(2), 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. Stockholm: Prisma.
   Google Scholar
• Sarama, J. (2004). Technology in early childhood mathematics: Building BlocksTM as an innovative technology-based curriculum. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama & A.-M. DiBiase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 361–375). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education] (2011). The Swedish curriculum for early childhood education: Läroplan för förskolan – Lgr. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers and Education, 44, 343–355. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Gentry, A. R., & Blake, S. (2012). Mathematics learning through the use of technology. In S. Blake, D. Winsor, & L. Allen (Eds.), Technology and young children: Bridging the Communication-Generation Gap (pp. 199–221). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, A. (2009). The mathematical association of America. Paper presented at the MathFest. Retrieved from http://www.maa.org/abstracts/mf2009-abstracts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, B., Spante, M., & Stenlund, J. (2012). Disparity in practice: Diverse strategies among teachers implementing interactive whiteboards into teaching practice in two Swedish primary schools. Learning Media and Technology, 37(3), 253–270. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2011.586352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., & Schmid, E. C. (2010). Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory research and practice. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54, 379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigmo, S. (2010). New spaces for language learning; A study of student interaction in media production in English. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1996). Thought and language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. c. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & De Geest, E. (2005). Principled teaching for deep progress: Improving mathematicallearning beyond methods and materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(2), 209–234.
   Google Scholar