822
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Children's understandings of characters' beliefs in persuasive arguments: links with gender and theory of mind

&
Pages 562-577 | Received 10 Jun 2014, Accepted 30 Jun 2014, Published online: 05 Aug 2014

References

  • Astington, J. W., Pelletier, J., & Homer, B. (2002). Theory of mind and epistemological development: The relation between children's second-order false-belief understanding and their ability to reason about evidence. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 131–144. doi: 10.1016/S0732-118X(02)00005-3
  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Barron, L. A. (2003). Ask and you shall receive? Gender differences in negotiators’ beliefs about requests for a higher salary. Human Relations, 56, 635–662. doi: 10.1177/00187267030566001
  • Bartsch, K., & London, K. (2000). Children's use of mental state information in selecting persuasive arguments. Developmental Psychology, 36, 352–365. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.352
  • Bartsch, K., London, K., & Campbell, M. D. (2007). Children's attention to beliefs in interactive persuasion tasks. Developmental Psychology, 43, 111–120. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.111
  • Bartsch, K., Wade, Ch. E., & Estes, D. (2011). Children's attention to others’ beliefs during persuasion: Improvised and selected arguments to puppets and people. Social Development, 20, 316–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00580.x
  • Bartsch, K., Wright, J., & Estes, D. (2010). Young children's persuasion in everyday conversation: Tactics and attunement to others’ mental states. Social Development, 19(2), 394–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00537.x
  • Białecka-Pikul, M. (2010). Teaching children to understand metaphors as a path leading to theory of mind development. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 529–544. doi: 10.1080/17405620802643692
  • Bosacki, S., & Astington, J. W. (1999). Theory of mind in preadolescence: Relations between social understanding and social competence. Social Development, 8, 237–255. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00093
  • Bosacki, S. L., & Moore, C. (2004). Preschoolers’ understanding of simple and complex emotions: Links with gender and language. Sex Roles, 50(9/10), 659–675. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000027568.26966.27
  • Brock, T. C., & Green, M. C. (Eds.). (2005). Persuasion. Psychological insights and perspectives (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Burgoon, M., & Klingle, R. S. (1998). Gender differences in being influential and/or influenced: A challenge to prior explanations. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 257–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Calero, C., Salles, A., Semelman, M., & Sigman, M. (2013). Age and gender dependent development of theory of mind in 6- to 8-years old children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(281), 1–6.
  • Clark, R. A., & Delia, J. G. (1976). The development of functional persuasive skills in childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 47, 1008–1014. doi: 10.2307/1128437
  • Delia, J. G., Kline, S. L., & Burleson, B. R. (1979). The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergarteners through twelfth-graders. Communication Monographs, 46(4), 241–256. doi: 10.1080/03637757909376010
  • DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Rucker, D. D., Wegener, D. T., & Braverman, J. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 43–56. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.43
  • Devine, R., & Hughes, C. (2013). Silent films and strange stories: Theory of mind, gender, and social experiences in middle childhood. Child Development, 84, 989–1003. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12017
  • Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2002). Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 38–51. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.38
  • Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Hughes, C. (2011). Social understanding and social lives. From toddlerhood through to the transition to school. London, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Hughes, C., Deater-Deckard, K., & Cutting, A. (1999). ‘Speak roughly to your little boy?’ Sex differences in the relations between parenting and preschoolers’ understanding of mind. Social Development, 8, 143–160. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00088
  • Hughes, C., Ensor, R., & Marks, A. (2011). Individual differences in false belief understanding are stable from 3 to 6 years and predict children's mental state talk with school friends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 96–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.012
  • Knudson, R. E. (1992). An analysis of persuasive discourse: Learning how to take a stand. Paper presented at 42nd annual meeting of the national reading conference, San Antonio, TX.
  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Maccoby, E. E. (2002). Gender and group process: A developmental perspective account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 54–59. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00167
  • McGrath, M. P., & Zook, J. M. (2011). Maternal control of girl versus boys: Relations to empathy and persuasive style with peers. Journal of Child Family Studies, 20, 57–65. doi: 10.1007/s10826-010-9377-4
  • Miceli, M., de Rosis, F., & Poggi, I. (2006). Emotional and non-emotional. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 20, 849–879. doi: 10.1080/08839510600938193
  • Miller, P. M., Danaher, D. L., & Forbes, D. (1986). Sex-related strategies for coping with interpersonal conflict in children aged five and seven. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 543–548. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.543
  • Moore, C., Bosacki, S., & Macgillivray, S. (2011). Theory of mind and social interest in zero-acquaintance play situation. Child Development, 82(4), 1163–1172. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01602.x
  • Ohbuchi, K. I., & Yamamoto, I. (1990). Power strategies of Japanese children in interpersonal conflict: Effects of age, gender and target. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151(3), 349–360. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1990.9914623
  • Selman, R. L., Schorin, M. Z., Stone, C. R., & Phelps, E. (1983). A naturalistic study of children's social understanding. Developmental Psychology, 19, 82–102. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.19.1.82
  • Sheldon, A. (1990). Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 5–31. doi: 10.1080/01638539009544745
  • Slaughter, V., & Gopnik, A. (1996). Conceptual coherence in the child's theory of mind: Training children to understand belief. Child Development, 67, 2967–2989. doi: 10.2307/1131762
  • Slaughter, V., Peterson, C. C., & Moore, C. (2013). I can talk you into it: Theory of mind and persuasion behavior in young children. Developmental Psychology, 49, 227–231. doi: 10.1037/a0028280
  • Taylor, M., & Carlson, S. (1997). The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind. Child Development, 68(3), 436–455. doi: 10.2307/1131670
  • Walker, S. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between young children's peer-related social competence and individual differences in theory of mind. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(3), 297–312. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.166.3.297-312
  • Weiss, D. M., & Sachs, J. (1991). Persuasive strategies used by preschool children. Discourse Processes, 14, 55–72. doi: 10.1080/01638539109544774
  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
  • Yeates, K. O., & Selman, R. L. (1989). Social competence in the schools: Toward an integrative developmental model for intervention. Developmental Review, 9, 64–100. doi: 10.1016/0273-2297(89)90024-5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.