Pedagogy with babies: perspectives of eight nursery managers

References

• Ahnert, L., & Lamb, M. E. (2003). Shared care: Establishing a balance between home and childcare setting. Child Development, 74(4), 1044–1049. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, A., & Barnett, L. (1986). The design of a day care system in a nursery setting for children under five: An abridged version of a report of an action research project. (Document No. 2T347). Institute of Human Relations for the Department of Health and Social Security (1975–1979). London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Vandell, D., Clarke-Stewart, K., & Owen, M. T. (2007). Are there long term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78(2), 681–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01021.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brebner, C., Hammon, L., Schaumloffel, N., & Lind, C. (2015, May). Using relationships as a tool: Early educators’ perspectives of the child-caregiver relationship in a childcare setting. Early Childhood Development and Care, 185(5), 709–726. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2014.951928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehony, K. J., & Nawrotzki, K. D. (2010). Neither social democratic nor neo-liberal: Child care and early years’ education policies in England since 1945. In K. Hagemann, K. H. Jarausch, & C. Allemann-Ghionda (Eds.), Time policies: Child care and primary education in post-war Europe (pp. 585–604). New York: Oxford Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. (2014). Perezhivanie: What have we missed about infant care? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15(3), 284–292. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2014.15.3.284
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, L. (2010). Constructing the triangle of care: Power and professionalism in practitioner/parent relationships. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(2), 181–196. doi: 10.1080/00071001003752203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, J., Berthelsen, D., & Segaran, N. (2009). Childcare workers’ and centre directors’ beliefs about infant childcare quality and professional training. Early Childhood Development and Care, 179(4), 453–475. doi: 10.1080/03004430701217688
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, P., & Hoggett, P. (Eds.). (2009). Researching beneath the surface: Psycho-social research methods in practice. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Colley, H. (2006). Learning to labour with feeling: Class, gender and emotion in childcare education and training. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1), 15–29. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2006.7.1.15
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care. Postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalli, C., White, E. J., Rochel, J., Duhn, I., Buchanan, E., Davidson, S. … Wang, B. (2011). Quality early childhood education for under-two-year-olds: What should it look like? A literature review. Wellington: Ministry of Education. ( LARGE FILE).
   Google Scholar
• Datler, W., Datler, M., & Funder, A. (2010). Struggling against a feeling of becoming lost: A young boy's painful transition to day care. International Journal of Infant Observation, 13(1), 65–87. doi: 10.1080/13698031003606659
   Google Scholar
• Degotardi, S., & Pearson, E. (2009). Relationship theory in the nursery: Attachment and beyond. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(2), 144–155. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2009.10.2.144
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L. (1989). Growing up in the post-modern age: On the child's situation in the modern family in the modern welfare state. ActaSociologica, 32(2), 155–180.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014). The revised early years foundation stage. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Drugli, M. B., & Undheim, A. M. (2012). Relationships between young children in full time day care and their caregivers: A qualitative study of parental and caregiver perceptions. Early Childhood Development and Care, 182(9), 1155–1165. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2011.602190
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. (2006). Exploring children's expressions of attachment in nursery. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 14(2), 81–95. doi: 10.1080/13502930285209931
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. (2007). Babies and young children in nurseries: Using psychoanalytic ideas to explore tasks and interactions. Children and Society, 21, 111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. (2009). 5000 hours: Facilitating intimacy in the care of children under three attending full time nursery (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of East London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. (2012, July). Emotion in nursery work: Work discussion as a model of critical professional reflection. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(2), 129–141. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2012.697877
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. (2013). Emotional aspects of nursery policy and practice: Progress and prospect. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2013.798464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. (2014a). Facilitating intimate and thoughtful attention to infants in nursery. In L. J. Harrison & J. Sumsion (Eds.), Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care: Exploring diverse perspectives on theory, research and practice (pp. 103–117). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. (2014b). Social defences in nurseries. In M. Rustin & D. Armstrong (Eds.), Social defences against anxiety: Explorations in the paradigm (pp. 284–299). Tavistock Clinic Series. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P., & Dearnley, D. (2007). Nurseries and emotional well being: Evaluating an emotionally containing model of professional development. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 27(3), 267–279. doi: 10.1080/09575140701594418
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, H., Ryan, J., & Hollway, W. (2012). Research encounters, reflexivity and supervision. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(5), 433–444. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2011.610157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., Fahey, J., & Kenway, J. (2013, April). Multi-sited global ethnography and travel: Gendered journeys in three registers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(4), 470–488. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.765613
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2013). Doing qualitative research differently. A psycho-social approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, J. (1988). Facilitating the development of intimacy between nurses and infants in day nurseries. Early Child Development and Care, 33, 99–111. doi: 10.1080/0300443880330108
   Google Scholar
• House, R. (Ed.). (2011). Too much too soon: Early learning and the erosion of childhood. Gloucestershire: Hawthorne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalliala, M. (2011). Look at me! Does the adult truly see and respond to the child in Finnish day-care centres? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(2), 237–253. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2011.574411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalliala, M. (2014). Toddlers as both more and less competent social actors in Finnish day care centres. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 34(1), 4–17. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2013.854320
   Google Scholar
• Kampman, J. 2004. Societalization of childhood: New opportunities? New demands? In H. Brembeck, B. Johansson, & J. Kampman (Eds.), Beyond the competent child: Exploring contemporary childhoods in the Nordic welfare societies (pp. 127–152). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karen, R. (1994). Becoming attached. New York, NY: Warner.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, P. (2009). Child care today: What we know and what we need to Know. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, P., Barnes, J., Nichols, M., Goldin, J., Stein, A., Sylva, K., … the FCCC team. (2006). Child care before 6 months of age: A qualitative study of mothers’ decisions and feelings about employment and non-maternal care. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research, 15(5), 471–502. doi: 10.1002/icd.473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, M. (2005). More than just coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a discourse analysis of news texts. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art.25.
   Google Scholar
• Manning-Morton, J. (2006). The personal is professional: Professionalism and the birth to threes practitioner. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7, 42–52. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2006.7.1.42
   Google Scholar
• Mathers, S., Eisenstadt, N., Sylva, K., Soukakou, E., & Erkey-Stevens, K. (2014, January). Sound foundations: A review of the research evidence on quality of early childhood education and care for children under three. London: The Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall Clark, R., & Bayliss, S. (2012). ‘Wasted down there’: Policy and practice with the under-threes. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(2), 229–242. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2011.652939
   Google Scholar
• McGurk, H., Caplan, M., Hennessy, E., & Moss, P. (1993). Controversy, theory and social context in contemporary day care research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb00965.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Music, G. (2011). Nurturing natures: Attachment and children's emotional, sociocultural and brain development. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012) Starting strong III. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. (2004). Time to get down to business? The response of early years practitioners to entrepreneurial approaches to professionalism. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), 5–24. doi: 10.1177/1476718X0421001
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. (2006). Professionalism and performativity: The feminist challenge facing early years practitioners. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 26(2), 187–200. doi: 10.1080/09575140600759997
   Google Scholar
• Page, J. (2011). Do mothers want professional carers to love their babies? Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(3), 310–323. doi: 10.1177/1476718X11407980
   Google Scholar
• Page, J. (2013). Will the ‘good’ [working] mother please stand up?: Professional and maternal concerns about education, care and love. Gender & Education Journal, 25(5), 548–563. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.797069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, J. (2014). Developing “professional love” in early childhood settings. In L. Harrison & J. Sumsion (Eds.), Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care-exploring diverse perspectives on theory, research, practice and policy (pp. 119–130). International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development Series. Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Page, J., & Elfer, P. (2013). The emotional complexity of attachment interactions in nursery. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(4), 553–567. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2013.766032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper, H., & Smith, H. (2003, December). ‘Touch’ in Educational and Child Care Settings: Dilemmas and responses. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 879–894. doi: 10.1080/0141192032000137358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S., & Goouch, K. (2012). Whose hand rocks the cradle? Parallel discourses in the baby room. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(2), 113–127. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2012.687865
   Google Scholar
• Rayna, S. (2004). Professional practices with under-ones in French and Japanese day care centres. Early Years: Journal of International Research and Development, 24(1), 35–47. doi: 10.1080/0957514032000179043
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, M. (2002). Nature, nurture and development: From evangelism, through science towards policy and practice. Child Development, 73(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, A. (2014). Bowlby's environment of evoluationary adaptedness. In D. Narvaez, J. Panksepp, A. Schore, & T. Gleason (Eds.), Evolution, early experience and human development (pp. 52–72). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2014, August). Building the ambition: National practice guidance on early learning and childcare: Children and young people (Scotland) Act 2014. Retrieved from http://scotgov.publishingthefuture.info/publication/building-the-ambition-national-practice-guidance-on-early-learning-and-childcare
   Google Scholar
• Sikes, P., & Piper, H. (2010). Researching sex and lies in the classroom: Allegations of sexual misconduct in schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, G. (2011). Don't we care?: The ethics and emotional labour of early years professionalism. Early Years, 31(1), 85–95. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2010.536948
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (2005). Action and emotion in development of cultural intelligence: Why infants have feelings like ours. In J. Nadel, & D. Muir (Eds.), Emotional development (pp. 61–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Malloch, S. (2002). Musicality and music before three: Human vitality and invention shared with pride. Zero to Three.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, M., Vandenbroeck, M., Van Laere, K., Lazzari, A., & Peeters, J. (2012). Towards competent systems in early childhood education and care. Implications for Policy and Practice. European Journal of Education, 47(4), 508–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 585–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar