Effects of challenging games on manipulative motor skills of 4–6 years old children: an application of challenge point framework

References

• Apache, R. G. (2005). Activity-based intervention in motor skill development 1. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100(3c), 1011–1020. doi: 10.2466/PMS.100.3.1011-1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, L. M., Morgan, P. J., van Beurden, E., & Beard, J. R. (2008). Perceived sports competence mediates the relationship between childhood motor skill proficiency and adolescent physical activity and fitness: A longitudinal assessment. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(40), 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantin, N., Ryan, J., & Polatajko, H. J. (2014). Impact of task difficulty and motor ability on visual-motor task performance of children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Human Movement Science, 34, 217–232. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienstmann, R. (2008). Games for motor learning. Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Donath, L., Faude, O., Hagmann, S., Roth, R., & Zahner, L. (2015). Fundamental movement skills in preschoolers: A randomized controlled trial targeting object control proficiency. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(6), 1179–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J. C., & Goodway, J. (2006). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults. Boston: Mcgraw-hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli, M. A., Morin, M. P., & Dubrowski, A. (2012). The application of the challenge point framework in medical education. Medical Education, 46(5), 447–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04210.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood, K., & Getchell, N. (2009). Life span motor development. Human Kinetics, 334.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, E. R., & Mcallister Byun, T. (2015). Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: A case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(1), 59–75. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.956232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkez, F. I., & Robinson, L. (2013). The efficacy of motor skill interventions among Turkish preschoolers: A review of the Turkish literature and recommendations. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 16(6), 769–774.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, S., Robinson, L., Wilson, A., & Lucas, W. (2012). Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(3), 305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesce, C., Crova, C., Marchetti, R., Struzzolino, I., Masci, I., Vannozzi, G., & Forte, R. (2013). Searching for cognitively optimal challenge point in physical activity for children with typical and atypical motor development. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 6(3), 172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riethmuller, A. M., Jones, R. A., & Okely, A. D. (2009). Efficacy of interventions to improve motor development in young children: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 124(4), e782–e792. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigoli, D., Piek, J. P., Kane, R., & Oosterlaan, J. (2012). Motor coordination, working memory, and academic achievement in a normative adolescent sample: Testing a mediation model. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(7), 766–780. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanli, E. A., & Lee, T. D. (2014). What roles do errors serve in motor skill learning? An examination of two theoretical predictions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(5), 329–337. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2014.913544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanli, E. A., & Lee, T. D. (2015). Nominal and functional task difficulty in skill acquisition: Effects on performance in two tests of transfer. Human Movement Science, 41, 218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2009). Enrollment of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children in preprimary programs, by level of program, control of program, and attendance status: Selected years, 1965 through 2008. Retrieved November 1, 2010, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_043.asp
   Google Scholar
• van Beurden, E., Zask, A., Barnett, L., & Dietrich, U. (2002). Fundamental movement skills – how do primary school children perform? The ‘move it Groove it’ program in rural Australia. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 5(3), 244–252. doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(02)80010-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarezadeh, M., Farrokhi, A., & Kazemnazhad, A. (2009). Determining validity and reliability of test of gross motor development in 3 to 11 years old children of Tehran. Olympic, 4, 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Zask, A., Barnett, L. M., Rose, L., Brooks, L. O., Molyneux, M., Hughes, D., & Salmon, J. (2012). Three year follow-up of an early childhood intervention: Is movement skill sustained. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar