Infants’ social evaluation abilities: testing their preference for prosocial agents at 6, 12 and 18 months with different social scenarios

References

• Brownell, C. A., Svetlova, M., & Nichols, S. (2009). To share or not to share: When do toddlers respond to another’s needs? Infancy, 14(1), 117–130. doi: 10.1080/15250000802569868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buon, M., Jacob, P., Margules, S., Brunet, I., Dutat, M., Cabrol, D. & Dupoux, E. (2014). Friend or foe? Early social evaluation of human interactions. PLOS ONE, 9(2), e88612. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. P., & Sommerville, J. A. (2014). “I pick you”: The impact of fairness and race on infants’ selection of social partners. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogsdill, E. J., Todorov, A. T., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2014). Inferring character from faces: A developmental study. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1132–1139. doi: 10.1177/0956797614523297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, J. M., & Decety, J. (2015). Precursors to morality in development as a complex interplay between neural, socioenvironmental, and behavioral facets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(41), 12657–12662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508832112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety, J., & Cowell, J. M. (2017). Interpersonal harm aversion as a necessary foundation for morality: A developmental neuroscience perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 1–12. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417000530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassbender, I., Teubert, M., & Lohaus, A. (2016). The development of preferences for own-race versus other-race faces in 3-, 6- and 9-month-old Caucasian infants. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(1), 152–165. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2015.1073585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2011). The developmental roots of fairness: Infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1012–1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01048.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition, 128(3), 451–474. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K. (2014). The case for social evaluation in preverbal infants: Gazing toward one’s goal drives infants’ preferences for helpers over hinderers in the hill paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1563), 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., Ullman, T., Tenenbaum, J., Goodman, N., & Baker, C. (2013). The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: Experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model. Developmental Science, 16, 209–226. doi: 10.1111/desc.12017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26(1), 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557–559. doi: 10.1038/nature06288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010). Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13, 923–929. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Mahajan, N. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19931–19936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110306108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvoet, C., Scola, C., Arciszewski, T., & Picard, D. (2016). Infants’ preference for prosocial behaviors: A literature review. Infant Behavior and Development, 45, 125–139. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvoet, C., Scola, C., Arciszewski, T., & Picard, D. (submitted). Infant’s perception of faces: Are cartoons of faces perceived differently from photographs? Infant and Child Development, Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., & Vaughn, L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 79–84. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Rieser-Danner, L. A. (1990). Infants’ differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 153–159. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.26.1.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Xiao, W. S., Xiao, N. G., Quinn, P. C., Chen, H., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (2015). Development of visual preference for own- versus other-race faces in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 500–511. doi: 10.1037/a0038835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, L. M. (2012). Advances in eye tracking in infancy research. Infancy, 17(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00101.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivola, C. Y., Funk, F., & Todorov, A. (2014). Social attributions from faces bias human choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 566–570. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for female. Perception, 31, 1109–1121. doi: 10.1068/p3331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robledo, M., Deák, G. O., & Kolling, J. W. (2010). Infants’ visual processing of faces and objects?: Age-related changes in interest, and stability of individual differences. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, Oregon, United States of America, 2482–2487.
   Google Scholar
• Salvadori, E., Blazsekova, T., Volein, A., Karap, Z., Tatone, D., Mascaro, O., … di Pellegrino, G. (2015). Probing the strength of infants’ preference for helpers over hinderers: Two replication attempts of Hamlin and Wynn (2011). PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0140570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scola, C., Holvoet, C., Arciszewski, T., & Picard, D. (2015). Further evidence for infants’ preference for prosocial over antisocial behaviors. Infancy, 20(6), 684–692. doi: 10.1111/infa.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, A., Von der Schulenburg, C., Brown, E., Badenoch, M., Butterworth, G., Parsons, S., & Samuels, C. (1998). Newborn infants prefer attractive faces. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 345–354. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steckler, C. M., Woo, B. M., & Hamlin, J. K. (2017). The limits of early social evaluation: 9-month-olds fail to generate social evaluations of individuals who behave inconsistently. Cognition, 16, 255–265. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, L. H., Ajina, S., Getov, S., Bahrami, B., Todorov, A., & Rees, G. (2012). Unconscious evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 715–727. doi: 10.1037/a0027950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813–833. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallez, C., Scola, C., Holvoet, C., & Meunier, H. (2016). L’évaluation des comportements pro versus antisociaux chez le jeune enfant : apport de l’oculométrie. Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l’Enfant, 142, 1–7.
   Google Scholar