Leisure-time centres: social pedagogical tradition in educational practice

References

• Alasuutari, M., Markström, A.-M., & Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2014). Assessment and documentation in early childhood education. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, B. (2013). Nya fritidspedagoger – i spänningsfältet mellan tradition och nya styrformer [New leisure-time pedagogues – in tension between tradition and new forms of governance]. (Dissertation) Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Åsén, G., & Vallberg Roth, A-C. (2012). Utvärdering i förskolan – en forskningsöversikt [Evaluation in preschool: A research review]. (Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 6:2012). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse,12(2), 10–17. doi: 10.1080/0159630930130203
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacherś soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy,18(2), 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (1995). Making sense of the problem of change: An ethnographic study of a teacher education reform. (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 100). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2010). Neoliberal restructuring in education and health professions in Europe: Questions of global class and gender. Current Sociology, 58(4), 551–569. doi: 10.1177/0011392110367998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, A. (2011). Why quality in education – and what quality? A linguistic analysis of the concept of quality in Swedish government texts. Education Inquiry, 2(4), 709–723. doi: 10.3402/edui.v2i4.22008
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes and control: Volume III. Towards a theory of educational transmission. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calander, F. (2000). From ‘the pedagogue of recreation’ to teacheŕs assistant. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,44(2), 207–224. doi: 10.1080/713696671
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2005). En teori om organisering [A theory of organization]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2009). Från kvalitet till meningsskapande. Postmoderna perspektiv – exemplet förskolan [Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives]. Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, D., Kampmann, J., & Rasmussen, K. (2010). At opbygge evaluering i peadagogisk praksis: En flerstemmig beretning om oplevelser og erfaringer med at etablerer social baeredygtig evalueringspraktiks i borneinstitutioner og SFO [Evaluation in pedagogical practice]. (Center i Barndoms- Ungdoms- og Familielivsforkning). Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet. Retrieved from http://rudar.ruc.dk/bitstream/1800/5841/1/Evaluering_paed_praksis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eidevald, C. (2013). Hallå, hur gör man? Systematiska analyser för utvärdering och utveckling i förskolan. [Hello, how to do it? Systematic analysis for evaluation and development in preschool]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Elfström, I. (2013). Uppföljning och utvärdering för förändring: Pedagogisk dokumentation som grund för kontinuerlig verksamhetsutveckling och systematiskt kvalitetsarbete i förskolan [Follow-up and evaluation for change: Educational documentation as a basis for continuous development and systematic quality work in preschool]. (Doktorsavhandling, Stockholms Universitet). Retrieved from http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:661443/FULLTEXT02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Emilsson, A. (2008). Det önskvärda barnet. Fostran uttryckt i vardagliga kommunikationshandlingar mellan lärare och barn i förskolan [The desirable child. Education expressed in everyday communication acts between teachers and children in preschool]. (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 268). Göteborg: ACTA Unversitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S., Lawn, M., Lingard, B., & Varjo, J. (2009). North by northwest: Quality assurance and evaluation processes in European education. Journal of Education Policy,24(2), 121–133. doi: 10.1080/02680930902733022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. (2003). Integration som text, diskursiv och social praktik. En policyetnografisk fallstudie av mötet mellan skolan och förskoleklassen [Integration as text, discursive and social practice. A policy ethnographic case-study of the encounter between the school and the preschool class]. (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 199). Göteborg: ACTA Unversitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. (2009). Fritidspedagogik – ämne, kunskapsfält eller vad? [Leisure education: Topic, field of knowledge, or what?]. Presentation in leisure-time centres conference When interest becomes knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund, B. (2004). Traditioner i möte. En kvalitativ studie av fritidspedagogers arbete med samlingar i skolan [Traditions in meeting] (Avhandling). Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 224. ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson, J. (2016). Organising and leading systematic quality work in the preschool – preschool managers perspectives. School, Leadership and Management, 36(3), 292–310. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2016.1247043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. (1999). Yrkeskulturer i möte: Läraren, fritidspedagogen och samverkan [Professional cultures in the meeting: The teacher, the leisure-time pedagogue and collaboration]. (Doktorsavhandling, Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 131). Göteborg: ACTA Unversitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, M. (2013). Governance and voluntariness for children in Swedish leisure-time centre: Leisure-time teachers interpreting their tasks and everyday practice. IRJEE, 1(1), 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Insulander, E., & Svärdemo Åberg, E. (2014). Vilken kunskap erkänns i det systematiska kvalitetsarbetet?: Om oförenliga tankestilar i dagens förskola [What knowledge is recognized in systematic quality work? Concerning incompatible mindset in today's preschool]. Nordisk Barnehageforskning,7(12), 1–18. doi:10.7577/ nbf.779
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, A. (1992). Fritidshemsvardag. En studie av pedagogiskt vardagsarbete i fritidshem [Leisure-time living. A study of pedagogical everyday work in a leisure-time centre]. (FoU-report 1992:7). Stockholm: Tryckgruppen AB.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, I., & Ljusberg, A.-L. (2004). Barn i fritidshem [Children in leisure-time centres]. Research nr. 21. Teacher education in Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Karila, K. (2012). A Nordic perspective on early childhood education and care policy. European Journal of Education,47(4), 584–595. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrby, G. (1997). Bedömning av pedagogisk kvalitet: Förskolan i fokus [Assessment of educational quality: Preschool in focus]. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 2(1), 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The qualitative research interview]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lager, K. (2010). Att organisera för kvalitet: En studie om kvalitetsarbete i kommunen och förskolan [organizing quality: Assessment practices in municipalities and pre-schools]. (Licentiatuppsats. Institutionen för pedagogik, kommunikation och lärande). Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Lager, K. (2016). ‘Learning to play with new friends’: Systematic quality development work in a leisure-time centre. Early Child Development and Care, 186(2), 307–323. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1030634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lager, K., Sheridan, S. & Gustafsson, J. (2016). Systematic quality development work in a Swedish leisure-time centre. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,60(6) 694–708. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2015.1066434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfdahl, A., & Perez Prieto, H. (2010). Den osynliggjorda förskolan [The forgotten pre-school]. In C. Lundahl & M. Folke-Fichtelius (Eds.), Bedömning i och av skolan – praktik, principer, politik [Assessment in and of school – practice, principles, policies] (pp. 71–86). Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Ball, S. J., & Braun, A. (2010). Behaviour, classroom management and student ‘control’: Enacting policy in the English secondary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(2), 153–170. doi: 10.1080/09620214.2010.503066
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Municio, I. (1995). Genomförande: Vem tolkar beslut och vem ser till att reformer blir mer än ord [implementation: Who interprets decisions and who makes reforms more than words]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Munton, A. G., Mooney, A., & Rowland, L. (1995). Deconstructing quality: A conceptual framework for the new paradigm in day care provision for the under eights. Early Child Development and Care,114(1) 11–23. doi: 10.1080/0300443951140102
   Google Scholar
• The National Agency for Education. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011, (LGR11). Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• The National Agency for Education. (2016). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011, (LGR11). Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• The National Agency for Education. (2017). Antal inskrivna barn [number of children enrolled]. Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering/statistik-i-tabeller/fritidshem
   Google Scholar
• Øksnes, M., Knutas, A., Ludvigsson, A., Falkner, C., & Kjaer, B. (2014). Lekens rolle i skandinaviske skolefritidsordninger og fritidshjem [The role of play in Scandinavian after school programs]. Barn, 3, 107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P., Segerholm, C., & Simola H. (Eds.). (2011). Fabricating quality in education: Data and governance in Europe. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: Or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the economic development administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlin, M. (2012). Fritidshemmets historiska dilemman. En nutidshistoria om konstruktionen av fritidshemmet i samordning med skolan [The leisure-time centres’ historical dilemmas. A recent history of the construction of the leisure-time centre in coordination with the school]. Västerås: Stockholms universitets förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (2008). Managementsamhället. Trender och idéer på 2000-talet [The management society. Trends and ideas in the 2000s]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Saar, T. (2014). Towards a new pedagogy in the after-school setting. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(2), 254–270. doi: 10.1080/1350293x.2014.883722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saar, T., Löfdahl, A., & Hjalmarsson, M. (2012). Kunskapsmöjligheter i svenska fritidshem [Knowledge possibilities in Swedish leisure-time centres]. Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 5(3), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• SFS 2010:800. Skollag [Education Act]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet. Retrieved from http://rkrattsdb.gov.se/SFSdoc/10/100800.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. (2001). Pedagogical quality in preschool: An issue of perspectives. (Doktorsavhandling, Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 160). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. (2007). Dimensions of pedagogical quality in preschool. The International Journal of Early Years Education,15(2), 197–217. doi: 10.1080/09669760701289151
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. (2009). Discerning pedagogical quality in preschool. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,53(3), 245–261. doi:10.1080/003138309 02917295 doi: 10.1080/00313830902917295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2009). Barns lärande: Fokus i kvalitetsarbetet [Children’s learning: Focus on quality work]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S., Williams, P., & Sandberg, A. (2013). Systematic quality work in preschool. International Journal of Early Childhood,45(1), 123–150. doi: 10.1007/s13158-012-0076-8
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1974:42. Barns fritid. Fritidsverksamhet för 7-12-åringar [Children’s leisure-time. Recreation activities for 7–12 year olds]. (Delbetänkade i Barnstugeutredningen). Stockholm: Beckmans Tryckerier.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1997:21. Växa i lärande - Förslag till läroplan för barn och unga 6-16 år [Growing in Learning – Proposed curriculum for children and young people 6–16 years], National report (SOU) SOU 1997:21.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Research Council. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk- samhällsvetenskaplig forskning [Ethical research principles within research in the humanities and social sciences]. Retrieved from http://wwww.codex.vr.se/texts/HFSFR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swedish School Inspectorate. (2010). Kvalitet i fritidshem. Skolinspektionens rapport 2010 [Quality in leisure-time centres]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Sylva, K., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sammons, P., Melhuish, E., Elliot, K., & Totsika, V. (2006). Capturing quality in early childhood through environmental rating scales. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,21(1), 76–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg Broman, I. (Ed.). (2011). Skola och barndom. Normering, demokratisering och individualisering [School and childhood. Standardisation, democratisation and individualisation]. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A-C. (2001). Läroplaner för de yngre barnen: Utvecklingen från 1800-talets mitt till idag [curriculums for younger children: The development from the mid-1800s to today]. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 6(4), 241–269.
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A-C. (2012). Different forms of assessment and documentation in Swedish preschools. Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 5(23), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A-C. (2015). Spår av transformativ bedömning i multidokumentation [traces of transformational assessment in multidocumentation]. In I. G. Åsén (Ed.), Utvärdering och pedagogisk bedömning i förskolan (pp. 51–71). Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M. (2008). A potential method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research: Issues in the development of ‘meta interpretation’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(1), 13–28. doi: 10.1080/13645570701401222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar