References
- Adair, J. K., Phillips, L., Ritchie, J., & Sachdeva, S. (2017). Civic action and play: Examples from Maori, Aboriginal Australian and Latino communities. Early Child Development and Care, 187(5-6), 798–811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1237049
- Anderson, K. T., & Holloway, J. (2020). Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 35(2), 188–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1552992
- Australian Department of Education. (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia_0.pdf
- Australian Productivity Commission. (2015). Childcare and early childhood learning. Retrieved from https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/childcare/report
- Brown, C. P. (2015). Conforming to reform: Teaching pre-kindergarten in a neoliberal early education system. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(3), 236–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X14538602
- Bull, R., & Bautista, A. (2018). A careful balancing act: Evolving and harmonizing a hybrid system of ECEC in Singapore. In S. L. Kagan (Ed.), The early advantage: Early childhood systems that lead by example (pp. 155–181). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Chinese Ministry of Education. (2001). Guidelines for kindergarten education (trial version). Beijing: Authors.
- Chinese Ministry of Education. (2012). Early learning and development guidelines for children aged 3 to 6 years. Beijing: Authors.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California, CA: Sage.
- Deng, Z., Gopinathan, S., & Lee, C. K.-E. (Eds.). (2013). Globalization and the Singapore curriculum. From policy to classroom. Singapore: Springer.
- Duhn, I. (2010). ‘The centre is my business’: Neo-liberal politics, privatisation and discourses of professionalism in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 49–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.49
- Duhn, I. (2012). Globalising childhood: Assembling the bicultural child in the New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whariki. International Critical Childhood Policy Studies Journal, 1(1), 82–105.
- Early Childhood Development Sub-group of the Productivity Agenda Working Group. (2008). A national quality framework for early childhood education and care: A discussion paper. Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/node/4539
- Edwards, S. E., Fleer, M., & Nuttall, J. G. (2008). A research paper to inform the development of an early years learning framework for Australia. Melbourne, Vic: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
- Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
- Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 357–378). London: Sage Publications.
- Feng, X. (2013). Explaining the domain of social development. In J. Li & X. Feng (Eds.), Explaining ‘early learning and development guidelines for children aged 3 to 6 years’ (pp. 88–108). Beijing: People’s Education Press.
- Feng, X. (2017). An overview of early childhood education in the People’s Republic of China. In N. Rao, J. Zhou, & J. Sun (Eds.), Early childhood education in Chinese societies (pp. 55–70). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Goodlad, J. I., & Associates. (1979). Curriculum inquiry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Guo, K., Kuramochi, K., & Huang, W. (2017). Learning and learners in early childhood curricula: Australia, Japan and China. Curriculum Perspectives, 37(1), 39–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0007-9
- Gupta, A. (2018). How neoliberal globalization is shaping early childhood education policies in India, China, Singapore, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Policy Futures in Education, 16(1), 11–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317715796
- Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2008). Studying children: A cultural-historical approach. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Hedges, H., & Cooper, M. (2014). Engaging with holistic curriculum outcomes: Deconstructing ‘working theories’. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(4), 395–408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2014.968531
- Huang, R., Yang, W., & Li, H. (2019). On the road to participatory pedagogy: A mixed-methods study of pedagogical interaction in Chinese kindergartens. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 81–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.009
- Janks, H. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3), 329–342.
- Kagan, S. L. (2018). The early advantage 1—early childhood systems that lead by example: A comparative focus on international early childhood education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Kaščák, O., & Pupala, B. (2013). Buttoning up the gold collar—The child in neoliberal visions of early education and care. Human Affairs, 23(2), 319–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0130-8
- Kaye, N. (2017). Updating Te Whariki: From the Minister of education. Early Education, 62, 6–7.
- Kennelly, J., & Llewellyn, K. R. (2011). Educating for active compliance: Discursive constructions in citizenship education. Citizenship Studies, 15(6-7), 897–914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2011.600103
- Khoo, K. C. (2010). The shaping of childcare and preschool education in Singapore: From separatism to collaboration. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 4(1), 23–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/2288-6729-4-1-23
- Kiersey, R. (2011). The discursive construction of Irish early childhood education and care policy: A critical discourse analysis. Doctoral Thesis. Technological University Dublin.
- Lee, I.-F. (2012). Unpacking neoliberal policies: Interrupting the global and local production of the norms. Journal of Pedagogy / Pedagogický Casopis, 3(1), 30–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10159-012-0002-z
- Li, J. (2013). The general introduction of ‘early learning and development guidelines for children aged 3 to 6 years’. In J. Li & X. Feng (Eds.), Explaining ‘early learning and development guidelines for children aged 3 to 6 years’ (pp. 10–53). Beijing: People’s Education Press.
- Li, H., & Chen, J. J. (2017). Evolution of the early childhood curriculum in China: The impact of social and cultural factors on revolution and innovation. Early Child Development and Care, 187(10), 1471–1483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1220373
- Li, H., Park, E., & Chen, J. J. (Eds.). (2016). Early childhood education policies in Asia Pacific: Advances in theory and practice. Singapore: Springer.
- Li, H., Rao, N., & Tse, S. K. (2012). Adapting Western pedagogies for Chinese literacy instruction: Case studies of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Singapore preschools. Early Education & Development, 23(4), 603–621. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.536441
- Li, M., Zhang, Y., Yuan, L., & Birkeland, Å. (2019). A critical analysis of education for sustainability in early childhood curriculum documents in China and Norway. ECNU Review of Education, 2(4), 441–457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119893483
- Lim, S. M. (2016). “I have … do you have?”: Facilitating children’s play and talk in a consumer society. In M. Ebbeck & M. Waniganayake (Eds.), Play in early childhood education: Learning in diverse contexts (2nd ed., pp. 134–146). South Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press.
- Lipponen, L., Ang, L., Lim, S., Hilppö, J., Lin, H., & Rajala, A. (2019). Vital voices for vital years: Perspectives on early childhood development in Singapore. Singapore: Lien Foundation.
- Malins, P. M. (2017). Making meaning of gender and sexual identities in early childhood: A critical discourse analysis of Canadian early childhood curricula. Doctoral Thesis. The University of Western Ontario.
- Maroy, C. (2009). Convergences and hybridization of educational policies around ‘post-bureaucratic’ models of regulation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(1), 71–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920801903472
- May, H. (2005). A ‘right as citizen to a free: [Early Childhood] Education’ 1930s–2000s. Children’s Issues: Journal of the Children’s Issues Centre, 9(2), 20–24, 49.
- McLachlan, C. J. (2017). ‘Not business as usual’: Reflections on the 2017 update of Te Whariki. Early Education, 62, 8.
- Millei, Z. (2011). Governing through early childhood curriculum, “the child,” and “community” ideologies of socialist Hungary and neoliberal Australia. European Education, 43(1), 33–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934430103
- Moss, P. (2016). Why can’t we get beyond quality? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(1), 8–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949115627895
- Moss, P., Dahlberg, G., Grieshaber, S., Mantovani, S., May, H., Pence, A., … Vandenbroeck, M. (2016). The organisation for economic co-operation and development’s international early learning study: Opening for debate and contestation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 343–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116661126
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2004). An introduction to Kei Tua o te Pae. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Early-Childhood/Kei-Tua-o-te-Pae/ECEBooklet1Full.pdf
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2009). Te whatu pōkeka. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2015). Report of the advisory group on early learning. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/consultations/Report-of-the-Advisory-Group-on-Early-Learning.pdf
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2016). Ambitious for New Zealand: The Ministry of Education four year plan 2016–2020. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/4-Year-Plan-2016-WEB.pdf
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2017). Te Whāriki He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2020). Different kinds of early learning services. Retrieved from https://parents.education.govt.nz/early-learning/early-childhood-education/different-kinds-of-early-childhood-education/
- Nuttall, J. (2013). Curriculum concepts as cultural tools: Implementing Te Whariki. In J. Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 177–191). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
- Phillips, L. G., Ritchie, J., & Adair, J. K. (2018). Young children’s citizenship membership and participation: Comparing discourses in early childhood curricula of Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. Advanced online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1543578
- Raban, B., & Kilderry, A. (2019). The development of early childhood education and care in Australia. Education Journal, 47(2), 23–40.
- Ritchie, J., Skerrett, M., & Rau, C. (2014). Kei tua i te awe māpara: Countercolonial unveiling of neoliberal discourses in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Review of Qualitative Research, 7(1), 111–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2014.7.1.111
- Rogers, R., Schaenen, I., Schott, C., O’Brien, K., Trigos-Carrillo, L., Starkey, K., & Chasteen, C. C. (2016). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature, 2004 to 2012. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1192–1226. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628993
- Savage, G. C. (2017). Neoliberalism, education and curriculum. In B. Gobby & R. Walker (Eds.), Powers of curriculum: Sociological perspectives on education (pp. 143–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Simpson, D., Lumsden, E., & McDowall Clark, R. (2015). Neoliberalism, global poverty policy and early childhood education and care: A critique of local uptake in England. Early Years, 35(1), 96–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2014.969199
- Sims, M., & Hui, S. K. F. (2017). Neoliberalism and early childhood. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1365411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1365411
- Sims, M., Tiko, L. T., & Liu, K. (2016). We’re going on a bear hunt: Reconciling neoliberalism and postcolonialism in Pacific early childhood. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1152673. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1152673
- Sims, M., & Waniganayake, M. (2015). The performance of compliance in early childhood: Neoliberalism and nice ladies. Global Studies of Childhood, 5(3), 333–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610615597154
- Singapore Early Childhood Development Agency. (2013). A good start for every child: About us. Retrieved from https://www.ecda.gov.sg/pages/aboutus.aspx
- Singapore Ministry of Education. (2012). Nurturing early learners: A curriculum framework for kindergartens in Singapore. Singapore: Authors.
- Sumsion, J., Barnes, S., Cheeseman, S., Harrison, L., Kennedy, A., & Stonehouse, A. (2009). Insider perspectives on developing belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 4–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910903400402
- Tan, C. T. (2007). Policy developments in pre-school education in Singapore: A focus on the key reforms of kindergarten education. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 1(1), 35–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/2288-6729-1-1-35
- Tan, C. T. (2017). Enhancing the quality of kindergarten education in Singapore: Policies and strategies in the 21st century. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 11(1), 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-017-0033-y
- Turunen, T., Uusiautti, S., & Määttä, K. (2014). Changing voices in early years curricula. An example from Finnish pre-school education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(2), 293–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.785540
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Weldemariam, K., Boyd, D., Hirst, N., Sageidet, B. M., Browder, J. K., Grogan, L., & Hughes, F. (2017). A critical analysis of concepts associated with sustainability in early childhood curriculum frameworks across five national contexts. International Journal of Early Childhood, 49(3), 333–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0202-8
- Wood, E. (2004). A new paradigm war? The impact of national curriculum policies on early childhood teachers’ thinking and classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(4), 361–374. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.014
- Wood, E. (2019). Unbalanced and unbalancing acts in the Early Years Foundation Stage: A critical discourse analysis of policy-led evidence on teaching and play from the office for standards in education in England (Ofsted). Education 3-13, 47(7), 784–795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1622494
- Wood, E., & Hedges, H. (2016). Curriculum in early childhood education: Critical questions about content, coherence, and control. The Curriculum Journal, 27(3), 387–405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1129981
- Yang, W. (2018). Early childhood curriculum as cultural practice: A comparative study of school-based curriculum development in Hong Kong and Shenzhen. Doctoral Thesis. The University of Hong Kong.
- Yang, W., & Li, H. (2018a). A school-based fusion of East and West: A case study of modern curriculum innovations in a Chinese kindergarten. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 17–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1294710
- Yang, W., & Li, H. (2018b). Cultural ideology matters in early childhood curriculum innovations: A comparative case study of Chinese kindergartens between Hong Kong and Shenzhen. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(4), 560–585. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1428367
- Yang, W., & Li, H. (2019a). Early childhood curriculum in Chinese societies: Policies, practices, and prospects. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Yang, W., & Li, H. (2019b). Changing culture, changing curriculum: A case study of early childhood curriculum innovations in two Chinese kindergartens. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 279–297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1568269
- Yang, W., & Li, H. (2020). The role of culture in early childhood curriculum development: A case study of curriculum innovations in Hong Kong kindergartens. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. Advanced online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119900359
- Yu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2019). The development of China’s kindergarten curriculum over the 70 years since 1949: From borrowing and learning to standardization and innovation. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 6, 34–48.