Improving learners’ comprehension skills in the early years through group discussion

References

• Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickenstaff, J., Hallquist, E., & Kopel, K. (2013). The effects of reading strategies in comprehension for elementary age learners. Retrieved from https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/2.
   Google Scholar
• Bowyer-Crane, C., Fricke, S., Schaefer, B., Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2017). Early literacy and comprehension skills in children learning English as an additional language and monolingual children with language weaknesses. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 771–790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9699-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiseth, L. (2010). Reading comprehension strategies for English language learners. ASCD Express, 5(11), Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ascd-express/vol5/511-toc.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Cahyani, H., de Courcy, M., & Barnett, J. (2018). Teachers’ code-switching in bilingual classrooms: Exploring pedagogical and sociocultural functions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(4), 465–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1189509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charamba, E. (2020). Translanguaging in a multilingual class: A study of the relation between students’ languages and epistemological access in science. International Journal of Science Education, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1783019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croninger, R. M. V., Li, M., Cameron, C., & Murphy, P. K. (2017). Classroom discussions: Building the foundation for productive talk. In P. K. Murphy (Ed.), Classroom discussions in education: Promoting productive talk about text and content (pp. 1–29). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, R., & Reynolds, Y. (2000). The use of dynamic assessment by educational psychologists in the UK. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16(3), 311–331.
   Google Scholar
• Djamarah, S. B. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C., & Davidson, C. (2020). Noticing the multidimensionality of active listening in a dialogic classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 43(1), 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2017). Language education policy and multilingual assessment. Language and Education, 31(3), 231–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1261892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambacher, E., Ginn, K., & Slater, K. (2018). From Serial Monologue to Deep dialogue: Designing online discussions to facilitate student learning in teacher education courses. Action in Teacher Education, 40(3), 239–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1486753
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, J., & Ahmad, A. (2015). Effect of extensive rote learning experience on subsequent academic achievement. Pak Armed Forces Med, 65(4), 510–514.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. M. (2014). Discussion group effectiveness is related to critical thinking through interest and engagement. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 12–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2014.13.1.12
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, T., Evans, S., & Crowley, K. (2016). An introduction to child development (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Khamees, K. S. (2016). An evaluative study of memorization as a strategy for learning English. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(4), 248–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J., Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second language Acquisition (pp. 207–226). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J., Capotosto, L., Branum-Mar, L., White, C., & Snow, C. (2012). Language proficiency, home-language status, and English vocabulary development: A longitudinal follow-up of the Word Generation program. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 437–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. (2017). Examining the effects of text genre, prior knowledge, and perceived interestingness on students’ acquisition of high-level comprehension. Master’s dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mbirimi-Hungwe, V. (2016). Translanguaging as a strategy for group work: Summary writing as a measure for reading comprehension among university students. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 34(3), 241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. (2012). Reading comprehension: What every teacher needs to know. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 432–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, S. (2018). Understanding child development: Psychological perspectives and applications. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mohangi, K., Krog, S., Stephens, O., & Nel, M. (2016). Contextual challenges in early literacy teaching And learning in Grade R Rural schools In South Africa. A Journal For Language Learning, 32(1), 71–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.5785/32-1-646
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Firetto, C. M., Hendrick, B. D., Li, M., Montalbano, C., & Wei, L. (2018). Quality talk: Developing students’ discourse to promote high-level comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1113–1160. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218771303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Greene, J., Firetto, C., Li, M., Lobczowski, N., & Duke, R. (2017). Exploring the influence of homogeneous versus heterogeneous grouping on students’ text-based discussions and comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 336–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35, 135–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probyn, M. (2015). Pedagogical translanguaging: Bridging discourses in South African science classrooms. Language and Education, 29(3), 218–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.994525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydland, V., & Grover, V. (2019). Argumentative peer discussions following individual reading increase comprehension. Language and Education, 33(4), 379–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1545786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagala, S. (2008). Concept and meaning of learning. Bandung: Alfabeta.
   Google Scholar
• Schuitema, J., Radstake, H., van de Pol, J., & Veugelers, W. (2018). Guiding classroom discussions for democratic citizenship education. Educational Studies, 44(4), 377–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1373629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayer, M. (2003). Not just Piaget, not just Vygotsky, and certainly not Vygotsky as an alternative to Piaget. Learning and Instruction, 13, 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silalahi, R. M. (2019). Understanding Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development for learning. Jurnal Ilmiah, 5(2), 169–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v15i2.1544
   Google Scholar
• Siswanti, F. H., & Ngadiso, E. S. (2014). The use of small-group discussion to improve students’ reading comprehension. English in Education, 2(2), 61153.
   Google Scholar
• Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–391. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Tugman, H. (2010). Literature discussion group and reading comprehension. Michigan: Northern Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020). Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(15), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyas, N. K. (2019). Students’ attitude towards small group discussion in reading comprehension. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Scholastic, 3(3), 8–13. Retrieved from http://e-journal.sastra-unes.com/index.php/JIPS/article/view/377.
   Google Scholar
• Van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2013). Sociocultural theory and second language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 277–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Wanzek, J., Roberts, G., Swanson, E., & Fall, A.-M. (2017). Improving content knowledge and comprehension for English language learners: Findings from a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 22–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L., & Murphy, P. K. (2017). Teacher and student roles: Walking the gradually changing line of responsibility. In P. K. Murphy (Ed.), Classroom discussions in education (pp. 30–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., Reznitskaya, A., Bourdage, K., Oyler, J., Glina, M., Drewry, R., … Nelson, K. (2017). Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: Changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 65–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P. (2008). Explicit instruction can help primary students learn to comprehend expository text. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd ed.) (pp. 171–182). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. (2008). Effective activities for teaching English idioms to EFL learners. The Internet TESL Journal, 14(3), Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/WuTeachingIdioms.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Zohrabi, M., Tadayyon, P., & Dobahkti, L. (2018). Investigating the effects of rote and contextualized memorization on Iranian elementary EFL learners’ vocabulary development. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 16–31.
   Google Scholar