Performance of neonatal and infant hearing screens: sensitivity and specificity

References

• Baart de la Faille L. Validity of large scale standardised behavioural screening. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1991; 482: 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya J, Bennett M, Tucker SM. Long term follow up of newborns tested with the auditory response cradle. Arch Dis Child 1984; 59:504–11.
   Google Scholar
• Davis AC, Wood S. The epidemiology of childhood hearing impairment: factors relevant to planning of services. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Davis AC, Wharrad H, Sancho J, Marshall DH. Early detection of hearing impairment – what role is there for behavioural methods in the neonatal period. Acta Oto Laryngologies 1991; (S482): 103–10.
   Google Scholar
• Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramakalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment Health Technol Assess 1997; 1:1–176.
   Google Scholar
• Fortnum H, Davis A. Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment in Trent Region, 1985–1993. Brit J Audiol 1997;31:409–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fortnum H, Davis A, Butler A, Stevens J. Health Service implications of changes in aetiology and referral patterns of hearing impaired children in Trent 1985–1993. Nottingham/Sheffield, MRC Institute of Hearing Research/Trent Health: Report to Trent Health, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Wilson MJ, Silva PD. Identifying hearing loss in the intensive care nursery: a 20-year summary. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5: 151–62.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard M. Research in the development of effective services for hearing-impaired people. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J, Lamb M, Freeman SD, Beeler J. Infant hearing screening with automated ABR in the NICU v WBN. In: Proceedings of the XXIII International Congress of Audiology, Bari, Italy, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde ML, Malizia K, Riko K, Alberti PW. Audiometrie estimation error with ABR in high-risk infants. Acta Oto Laryngologica 1991;111:212–19.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson A, Ashurst H. Screening for sensorineural deafness by health visitors. Arch Dis Child 1990;65:841–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C, Kimm L, Cafarelli-Dees D, Campbell M, Thornton R. Early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment: a controlled trial of universal neonatal screening. Lancet 1998; 352:1957–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C, Kimm L, Thornton R, Davis A. False positives in universal neonatal screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI). Lancet 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lutman ME, Davis AC, Fortnum HM, Wood S. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997; 18:265–76.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick B, Curnock D, Spavins F. Auditory screening of special care neonates using the Auditory Response Cradle. Arch Dis Child 1984;59:1168–72.
   Google Scholar
• Mason SM. Automated system for screening hearing using the auditory brainstem response. Br J Audiol 1998;22:211–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mason S, Davis A, Wood S, Farnsworth A. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening using the Nottingham ABR screener. Ear Hear 1998; 19:91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison AS. Screening in Chronic Disease. New York: OUP, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Norton S. Personal communication and see: Recommendations of the NIDCD Working Group on early identification of hearing impairment on acceptable protocols for use state-wide universal newborn hearing screening programs. 2000. (See National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders website http://www.nih.gov/nidcd).
   Google Scholar
• Plant A, Pick G. The screening and surveillance of infant hearing in North Staffordshire: a clinical audit report. Unpublished report, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard SL, Brown AM, Russell PT. Feasibility of acoustic distortion product testing in newborns. Br J Audiol 1996;30:261–74.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon PE, Bamford JM. Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveileence methods. Arch Dis Child 1990,65:479–84.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Webb HD. The Sheffield Targeted Neonatal Hearing Study. Neonatal TEOAE, ABR and 8 month testing as predictors of hearing impairment at age 5 years. European Federation of Audiological Societies. Prague, May, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Webb HD, Hutchinson J, Connell J, Smith MF, Buftin JT. Evaluation of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in the newborn. Br J Audiol 1991;25:11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Davis A, Davies CM, Dixon S. The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales Arch Dis Child 1998; 78: 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton G, Scanlon P. Health visitor screening versus vigilance: outcomes of programmes for detecting permanent childhood hearing loss in west Berkshire. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 145–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker SM, Bhattacharya J.Screening of hearing impairment in the newborn using the Auditory Response Cradle. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 911–19.
   Google Scholar
• Watkin P. The age of identification of childhood deafness: improvements since the 1970s. Public Health 1991; 105:303–112.
   Google Scholar
• Watkin PM. Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness Arch Dis Child 1996; 74: F16–25.
   Google Scholar
• White KR, Maxon AB. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: simple, beneficial, and presently justified. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995;32:201–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JMG, Junger G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Wood S, Davis AC, McCormick B. Changing performance of the Health Visitor Distraction Test when targeted neonatal screening is introduced into a health district. Br J Audiol 1997; 31:55–61.
   Google Scholar