9
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Bisensory augmentation of complex spoken passages

&
Pages 53-58 | Published online: 22 Jun 2016

References

  • Arnold P. Bisensory augmentation: children’s speechreading and listening. Br J Dcv Psychol 2001.
  • Arnold P, Mill F. Bisensory augmentation: a speechreading advantage when speech is clear and intact. Br J Psychol 2001; 91.
  • Calvert EA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams S CR, McGuire PK et al. Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 1997; 276:593–6.
  • Campbell R, Dodd B, Burnham D. Hearing by Eye II: Advances in the Psychology of Speechreading and Auditory-visual Speech. Hove: Psychology Press, 1998.
  • Cotton JC. Normal ‘visual hearing’. Science 1935; 82:592–3.
  • Erber NP. Auditory-visual perception of speech: a survey. In: H Birk Nielsen, E Kampp, eds. Visual and Audio-visual Perception of Speech. Copenhagen: Gl.Avernaes, 1974; 12–30.
  • Flesch RF. A new readability yardstick. J App Psychol 1948;32:221–33.
  • Jordon NC. Language processing and reading ability in children: a study based on speech-shadowing techniques. J Psycholinguistic Res 1988;17:357–77.
  • Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1787/1965.
  • Lerner S. A study of shadowing ability. Dissertations Abstracts International 1975; 35 10-B: 512.
  • McGurk H, MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976; 265:746–8.
  • Neale MD. Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (revised British edition (manual)). Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1988.
  • Probasco PD. Social feedback factors in vocal shadowing. Dissertations Abstracts International 1970; 31 A: 828–9.
  • Reisberg D. Looking where you listen: visual cues and auditory attention. Acta Psychologica 1978;42:331–41.
  • Reisberg D, McLean J, Goldfield A. Easy to hear but hard to understand: a speecheading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. In: B Dodd, R Campbell, eds. Hearing by Eye: The Psychology of Specclueading. London: LEA, 1987; 97–113.
  • Sanders DA, Goodrich SJ. The relative contribution of visual components of speech to speech intelligibility as a function of 3 conditions of frequency distortion. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 154–9.
  • Schwartz J-L, Robert-Ribes J, Escudier P. Ten years after Summerfield: a taxonomy of models for audio-visual fusion in speech perception. In: R Campbell, B Dodd, D Burnham, eds. Hearing by Eye II: Advances in the Psychology of Speechreading and Auditory-visual Speech. Hove: Psychology Press, 1998; 85–108.
  • Sumby WH, Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acousl Soc Am 1954;26:212–15.
  • Summerfield Q. Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In: B Dodd, R Campbell, eds. Hearing by Eye: The Psychology of Lip-reading. London: LEA, 1987; 85–108.
  • Summerfield Q, McLeod A, McGrath M, Brooke M. Lips, teeth, and the benefits of lipreading. In: AW Young, HD Ellis, eds. Handbook of Research on Face Processing. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1989; 223–33.
  • Wagenaar WA, Shreuder R, Wijlhuizen GJ. Readability of instructional text, written for the general public. App Cognitive Psych 1987; 1:155–67.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.