References
- Toroser D, Carlson J, Robinson M, et al. Factors impacting time to acceptance and publication for peer-reviewed publications. Curr Med Res Opin 2016: published online 31 December 2016, doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271778
- Ware M, Mabe M. The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, Paper 9. 2015. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/9 [Last Accessed 26 December 2016]
- van Teijlingen E, Hundley V. Getting your paper to the right journal: a case study of an academic paper. J Adv Nurs 2002;37:506-11
- Mulhall A, Kelly D. Response to: Getting your paper to the right journal: a case study of an academic paper by E. Van Teijlingen and V. Hundley. J Adv Nurs 2002;37:506-11
- Palese A, Coletti S, Dante A. Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: a retrospective analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:543-51
- Nguyen VN, Haddaway NR, Gutowsky KFG, et al. How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132557
- Hallberg IR. Moving nursing research towards a stronger impact on health care practice? Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46:407-12
- Pautasso M, Schafer H. Peer review delay and selectivity on ecology journal. Scientometrics 2009;84:307-15
- Green R, Del Mar C. Research papers submitted to Australian Family Physician – types and timelines. Aust Fam Physician 2006;35:362-4
- Kalcioglu MT, Ileri Y, Karaca S, et al. Research on the submission, acceptance and publication times of articles submitted to international otorhinolaryngology journals. Acta Inform Med 2015;23:379-84
- Björk BC. Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges. Intern Emerg Med 2017: published online 18 January 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2
- Chew FS. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:627-32
- Liesegang TJ, Shaikh M, Crook JE. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:551-60
- Silberzweig JE, Khorsandi AS. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:1620-3
- Kovanis M, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Trinquart L. The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: strong imbalance in the collective enterprise. PLoS One 2016;11:e0166387
- Stahel PF, Moore EE. Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system. BMC Med 2014;26:179
- Kumar P, Rafiq I, Imam E. Negotiation on the assessment of peer-reviewed research articles with academic reviewers: application of peer-observation approach of teaching. Higher Education 2011;62:315-32
- Ali P, Watson R. Peer review and the publication process. Nurs Open 2016;3:193-202
- Tite L, Schroter S. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:9-12
- Kljaković-Gaspić M, Hren D, Marusić A, Marusić M. Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal? Arch Med Res 2003;34:439-43
- Paget SP, Caldwell PH, Murphy J, et al. Moving beyond “not enough time”: factors influencing paediatric clinicians’ participation in research. Intern Med J 2016: published online 7 December 2016, doi: 10.1111/imj.13351