The impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D on the improvement of shoulder image quality in head and neck CTA

References

• Li Q, Lv F, Wei Y, et al. Automated subtraction CT angiography for visualization of the whole brain vasculature: a feasibility study. Acad Radiol 2013;20:1009-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong MX, Hu L, Huang YJ, et al. Cerebrovascular risk factors for patients with cerebral watershed infarction: a case-control study based on computed tomography angiography in a population from Southwest China. Medicine 2017;96:e7505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socol Y, Welsh JS. Regarding the credibility of data showing an alleged association of cancer with radiation from CT scans. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2016;15:159-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baysson H, Journy N, Roue T, et al. [Exposure to CT scans in childhood and long-term cancer risk: a review of epidemiological studies]. Bulletin du cancer 2016;103:190-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae IH, Kim Y, Lee SW, et al. Standard chest CT using combined automated tube potential selection and iterative reconstruction: image quality and radiation dose reduction. Clin Imag 2014;38:641-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik A, Kerl J, Razek A, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of dual-energy CT of the head and neck compared with a standard 120-kVp acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1994-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik A, Razek A, Elhawary G, et al. Effect of increasing the sampling interval to 2 seconds on the radiation dose and accuracy of CT perfusion of the head and neck. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014;38:469-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Yoo SY, Jeon TY, et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction in ultra-low-dose pediatric chest CT: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Clin Imag 2016;40:1018-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klink T, Obmann V, Heverhagen J, et al. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1645-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WL, Li M, Zhang B, et al. CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality. PloS One 2013;8:e81486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332
   Google Scholar
• Pan X, Sidky EY, Vannier M. Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Prob 2009;25:1230009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euler A, Stieltjes B, Szucs-Farkas Z, et al. Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on low-contrast lesion detection and image quality in abdominal CT: a 12-reader-based comparative phantom study with filtered back projection at different tube voltages. Eur Radiol 2017;27(12):5252-5259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha MJ, Seo JS, Yoo DS, et al. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection. Acta Radiol 2017;59(3):280-286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyama Y, Nakaura T, Oda S, et al. Iterative reconstruction designed for brain CT: a correlative study with filtered back projection for the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017;41(6):884-890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laqmani A, Avanesov M, Butscheidt S, et al. Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose4. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1971-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobrial F, Eldin M, Razek A, et al. Computed tomography assessment of hepatic metastases of breast cancer with revised response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria (Version 1.1): inter-observer agreement. Pol J Radiol 2017;82:593-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Zhang L, Zheng J, et al. A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography. Clin Radiol 2017;72:96.e91-96.e96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen H, Dai G, Luo M, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of CT coronary angiography with automatic tube current modulation and strong adaptive iterative dose reduction three-dimensional (AIDR3D). PloS One 2015;10:e0142185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomizawa N, Nojo T, Akahane M, et al. Adaptive iterative dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT: assessment of radiation dose reduction and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:318-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Yoshizumi T, et al. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. Acad Radiol 2009;16:997-1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, He W, Chen J, et al. Feasibility study of radiation dose reduction in adult female pelvic CT scan with low tube-voltage and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Kor J Radiol 2015;16:1047-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant N, Scalea T, Stein D. Can CT angiography replace conventional bi-planar angiography in the management of severe scapulothoracic dissociation injuries? Am Surgeon 2012;78:875-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razek A, Gaballa G, Megahed A, et al. Time resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) MR angiography of arteriovenous malformations of head and neck. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1885-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Razek AA, Denewer AT, Hegazy MA, et al. Role of computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of vascular stenosis in head and neck microvascular free flap reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:811-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar