References
- AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP. AMWA-EMWA-ISMPP joint position statement on the role of professional medical writers. Medical Writing. 2017;26:7–8. [cited 2019 Jan 5]. Available from: https://journal.emwa.org/writing-better/amwa-emwa-ismpp-joint-position-statement-on-the-role-of-professional-medical-writers/.
- Gristwood T, Farrow F, Hill C, et al. When should medical writers be listed as authors? Curr Med Res Op. 2014;30(suppl 1):S22.
Reference
References
- Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Patton TJ, et al. Prevalence and impact of health-related internet and smartphone use among dermatology patients. Cutis. 2015;95:323–328.
- Patel RR, Hill MK, Smith MK, et al. An updated assessment of social media usage by dermatology journals and organizations. Dermatol Online J. 2018;24(2). Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jr646v0
References
- Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, et al. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017:89:218–235.
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. 2018. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/updated_recommendations_dec2018.html
References
- World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (9 July 2018). [cited 2018 Nov]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
- Miller JE, Korn D, Ross JS. Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012. BMJ Open 2015;5:e009758.
References
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) [cited 2017 Nov 27]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/self-mgmt/pemat/index.html.
- Patient Focused Medicines Development. The Patient Engagement Quality Guidance [cited 2018 Sep 22]. Available from: https://patientfocusedmedicine.org/the-patient-engagement-quality-guidance/.
References
- Hartley J. Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014;102:146–148.
- Pferschy-Wenzig EM, Pferschy U, Wang D, et al. Does a graphical abstract bring more visibility to your paper? Molecules. 2016;21:1247.
Reference
- Taichman DB, Sahni P, Pinborg A, et al. Data sharing statements for clinical trials: a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA. 2017;317:2491–2492.
References
- Scopus [internet]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019 [cited 2018 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/search.
- PubMed. [cited 2018 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
- Embase [internet]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019 [cited 2018 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.embase.com/#search.
- PubsHub, Journals & CongressesSM [internet]. Dublin, Ireland: ICON plc; 2019 [cited 2018 Jan 3]. Available from: https://journalsandcongresses.pubshub.com/journals/IpDashboard.
Reference
- Mitra B, Nalisnick E, Craswell N, et al. A dual embedding space model for document ranking. pharXiv:1602.01137, 2016. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01137
References
- US FDA. US FDA patient-focused drug development (PFDD) initiative [cited 2018, Dec 13]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/ucm347317.ht.
- Richards T, Schroter S, Price A, et al. Better together: patient partnership in medical journals. BMJ. 2018;362:k3798.
- Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A, et al. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94:291–309.
- Burton D, Blundell N, Jones M, et al. Shared decision-making in cardiology: do patients want it and do doctors provide it? Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80:173–179.
- Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Urowitz S, et al. Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expect. 2007;10:248–258
References
- Schroter S, Price A, Snow R, et al. Introduction of patient review alongside traditional peer review at a general medical journal (The BMJ): a mixed methods study. Peer Review Congress. 2017. Available from: https://peerreviewcongress.org/prc17-0103
- Richards T. Better together: patient partnership in medical journals. BMJ 2018;362:k3798. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/362/bmj.k3798.full.pdf.
- Schroter S, Price A, Flemyng E, et al. Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patients and public reviewers at two journals. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e023357. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/8/9/e023357.full.pdf.
References
- Lang H, Koder T, Winchester C. Is pharmaceutical industry research posted as preprints? Presented at ISMPP; 2018 April 30–May 2; National Harbor, MD, USA. doi: 10.21305/ISMPPUS2018.002
- Altmetric. Putting the Altmetric Attention Score in context; 2017 [cited 2019, January 7]. Available from: https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060970-putting-the-altmetric-attention-score-in-context.
References
- Bull World Health Organ 2017;95:482–48. Available from: https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/95/7/17-196733.pdf
- http://www.icmje.org/
- http://annals.org/aim
- http://www.thebmj.com/
- https://www.who.int/bulletin/en/
- https://www.aerzteblatt.de/
- https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejhs/index
- http://ijms.sums.ac.ir/index.php/IJMS
- https://jamanetwork.com/
- https://jkms.org/
- http://www.thelancet.com/
- https://www.nejm.org/
- http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal
- https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/
- https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid = 0034-9887&lng=es&nrm=iso
- http://ugeskriftet.dk/
References
- Absolom K, Holch P, Woroncow B, et al. Beyond lip service and box ticking: how effective patient engagement is integral to the development and delivery of patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1077–1085. DOI:10.1007/s11136-014-0909-z.
- Barnfield S, Pitts AC, Kalaria R, et al. “Is all the stuff about neurons necessary?” The development of lay summaries to disseminate findings from the Newcastle Cognitive Function after Stroke (COGFAST) study. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:18.
- Blackburn S, McLachlan S, Jowett S, et al. The extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in primary care research: a mixed methods study. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:16.
- Forsythe L, Heckert A, Margolis MK, et al. Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(1):17–31. DOI:10.1007/s11136-017-1581-x.
- Howe A, Mathie E, Munday D, et al. Learning to work together – lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement. Res Involv Engagem. 2017;3:1.
- Hyde C, Dunn KM, Higginbottom A, et al. Process and impact of patient involvement in a systematic review of shared decision making in primary care consultations. Health Expect. 2017;20(2):298–308. DOI:10.1111/hex.12458.
- Mann C, Chilcott S, Plumb K, et al. Reporting and appraising the context, process and impact of PPI on contributors, researchers and the trial during a randomised controlled trial – the 3D study. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:15.
- Pérez Jolles M, Martinez M, Garcia SJ, et al. Involving Latina/o parents in patient-centered outcomes research: contributions to research study design, implementation and outcomes. Health Expect. 2017;20(5):992–1000.
- Pollard K, Donskoy AL, Moule P, et al. Developing and evaluating guidelines for patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(2):141–155.
Reference
- Saxton GD, Niyirora JN, Guo C, et al. #AdvocatingForChange: the strategic use of hashtags in social media advocacy. Adv Social Work. 2015;16:154–169.
References
- Curtis JR, Jain A, Askling J, et al. A comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes in selected European and U.S. Rheumatoid Arthritis Registries. Semin Arthrit Rheum. 2010;40:2–14.e1.
- Spisla CM, Lundberg CB. Standardization of patient registries for improved data collection and outcome measurement. NI 2012: 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23–27, 2012. Montreal, Canada: International Congress in Nursing Informatics; 2012. p. 391.
References
- FDA. FDA Social Media Guidance: presenting risks and benefits with social media’s character space limitations; 2014. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm401087.pdf.
- Twitter Inc. [cited 2019 Jan 11]. Available from: https://twitter.com/.
References
- Sullivan SD, Watkins J, Sweet B, et al. Health technology assessment in health-care decisions in the United States. Value Health. 2009;12:S39–S44. DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00557.x
- Angelis A, Lange A, Kanavos P. Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2018;19(1):123–152. DOI:10.1007/s10198-017-0871-0
- Tenopir C, Levine K, Allard S, et al. Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: results of an international questionnaire. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(10):2344–2361. DOI:10.1002/asi.23598