Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review

References

• The periodic health examination. Canadian task force on the periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1193–1254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95:2s–4s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenwold RH, Van Deursen AM, Hoes AW, et al. Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:746–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elm EV, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C, et al. Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before–after analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB. The STARD initiative. Lancet. 2003;361:71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidalgo BM, Crabb DP, Lawrenson JG. Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35:315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, et al. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, et al. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med. 2014;19:47–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology. 2015;274:781–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao A, Brück K, Methven S, et al. Quality of reporting and study design of CKD cohort studies assessing mortality in the elderly before and after STROBE: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0155078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, et al. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, et al. REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Br J Cancer. 2005;93:387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore HM, Kelly A, Jewell SD, et al. Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ). J Proteome Res. 2011;10:3429–3438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Seehra J, et al. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:754–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzela L, Golder S, Liu Y, et al. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348:f7668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersema GS, Grotenhuis N, Bayon Y, et al. The effect of biomaterials used for tissue regeneration purposes on polarization of macrophages. Biores Open Access. 2016;5:6–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heumen CC, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Fiber-reinforced dental composites in beam testing. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1435–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijder RA, Konings MK, Lucas P, et al. Flow variability and its physical causes in infusion technology: a systematic review of in vitro measurement and modeling studies. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015;60:277–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louropoulou A, Slot DE, Van der Weijden F. Influence of mechanical instruments on the biocompatibility of titanium dental implants surfaces: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;26:841–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montano M, Bakker EJ, Murk AJ. Meta-analysis of supramaximal effects in in vitro estrogenicity assays. Toxicol Sci. 2010;115:462–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbenga S, Fratila-Apachitei LE, Zadpoor AA. Nanopattern-induced osteogenic differentiation of stem cells – a systematic review. Acta Biomater. 2016;46:3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behring J, Junker R, Walboomers XF, et al. Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen barrier membranes. A systematic review. Odontology. 2008;96:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbach LA, Portelli LA, Savelkoul HF, et al. Calcium homeostasis and low-frequency magnetic and electric field exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Environ Int. 2016;92-93:695–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gizzo S, Noventa M, Di Gangi S, et al. Could in-vitro studies on Ishikawa cell lines explain the endometrial safety of raloxifene? Systematic literature review and starting points for future oncological research. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015;24:497–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotelli MT, Bocale D, De Fazio M, et al. In-vitro evidence for the protective properties of the main components of the Mediterranean diet against colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Surg Oncol. 2015;24:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamanna F, Contartese D, Maglio M, et al. A systematic review on in vitro 3D bone metastases models: a new horizon to recapitulate the native clinical scenario? Oncotarget. 2016;7:44803–44820.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coray R, Zeltner M, Ozcan M. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;62:333–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnema KJ, Ozcan M, Post WJ, et al. In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:615–622 e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira AH, Rodrigues NF, Pinho AC, et al. Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:e751–e764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papia E, Larsson C, Du Toit M, et al. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res.. 2014;102:395–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleuel J, Zaucke F, Bruggemann GP, et al. Effects of cyclic tensile strain on chondrocyte metabolism: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista Napotnik T, Rebersek M, Vernier PT, et al. Effects of high voltage nanosecond electric pulses on eukaryotic cells (in vitro): a systematic review. Bioelectrochemistry. 2016;110:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister D, Ciufolini S, Mondelli V. Effects of psychotropic drugs on inflammation: consequence or mediator of therapeutic effects in psychiatric treatment? Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016;233:1575–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen BW, Ortengren U, Simon-Santamaria J, et al. Methods and terminology used in cell-culture studies of low-dose effects of matrix constituents of polymer resin-based dental materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124:511–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Schwap M, Graf A, Preinerstorfer A, et al. Microleakage after thermocycling of cemented crowns – a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2011;27:855–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonczkowski P, De Scheerder MA, De Spiegelaere W, et al. Minimal requirements for primary HIV latency models based on a systematic review. AIDS Rev. 2016;18:171–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, et al. Wear of ceramic and antagonist – a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24:433–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahravan A, Haghdoost AA, Adl A, et al. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2007;33:96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalesi M, Jafari SA, Kiani M, et al. In vitro gluten challenge test for celiac disease diagnosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62:276–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samiei M, Farjami A, Dizaj SM, et al. Nanoparticles for antimicrobial purposes in endodontics: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;58:1269–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motamedian SR, Hosseinpour S, Ahsaie MG, et al. Smart scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: a systematic review of literature. WJSC. 2015;7:657–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Larijani B, Abdollahi M. A systematic review of in vitro studies conducted on effect of herbal products on secretion of insulin from Langerhans islets. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;15:447–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni W, Shao X, Di X, et al. In vitro synergy of polymyxins with other antibiotics for Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45:8–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Li C, Shan J, et al. Mechanisms of renal cell apoptosis induced by cyclosporine A: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Am J Nephrol. 2011;33:558–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilango KB, Kavimani S. A systematic review of mathematical models of pharmaceutical dosage forms. Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res. 2015;6:59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman NA, Rasil AN, Meyding-Lamade U, et al. Immortalized endothelial cell lines for in vitro blood–brain barrier models: a systematic review. Brain Res. 2016;1642:532–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlShwaimi E, Bogari D, Ajaj R, et al. In vitro antimicrobial effectiveness of root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review. J Endod. 2016;42:1588–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Kinematic effects of nickel–titanium instruments with reciprocating or continuous rotation motion: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod. 2016;42:1009–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I, et al. Longevity of self-etch dentin bonding adhesives compared to etch-and-rinse dentin bonding adhesives: a systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2016;16:96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayanegara A, Wina E, Takahashi J. Meta-analysis on methane mitigating properties of saponin-rich sources in the rumen: influence of addition levels and plant sources. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2014;27:1426–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zusman O, Avni T, Leibovici L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro synergy of polymyxins and carbapenems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:5104–5111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethem Yaylali I, Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B. Ultrasonically activated irrigation to remove calcium hydroxide from apical third of human root canal system: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod. 2015;41:1589–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzi TL, Gimenez T, Tedesco TK, et al. Adhesive systems for restoring primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:364–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann AS, Collares FM, Leitune VC, et al. The effect of antimicrobial agents on bond strength of orthodontic adhesives: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2016;19:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira GK, Venturini AB, Silvestri T, et al. Low-temperature degradation of Y-TZP ceramics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;55:151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:765–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes AP, Sarkis-Onofre R, Moraes RR, et al. Can silanization increase the retention of glass-fiber posts? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Operative Dentistry. 2015;40:567–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves CA, Machado AL, Vergani CE, et al. Cytotoxicity of denture base and hard chairside reline materials: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:114–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaizer MR, de Oliveira-Ogliari A, Cenci MS, et al. Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2014;30:e41–e78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aurélio IL, Marchionatti AM, Montagner AF, et al. Does air particle abrasion affect the flexural strength and phase transformation of Y-TZP? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2016;32:827–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavan LM, Rego DF, Elias ST, et al. In vitro anti-tumor effects of statins on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernades Kde O, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP, et al. The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding. A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145:1120–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Dc D, Coutinho M, de Sousa AS, et al. A meta-analysis of the most indicated preparation design for porcelain laminate veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:215–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, et al. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2014;39:E31–E44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skupien JA, Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, et al. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, et al. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates NA, Myer GD, Shearn JT, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament biomechanics during robotic and mechanical simulations of physiologic and clinical motion tasks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasipanodya JG, Nuermberger E, Romero K, et al. Systematic analysis of hollow fiber model of tuberculosis experiments. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:S10–S17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arilla FV, Yeung M, Bell K, et al. Experimental execution of the simulated pivot-shift test: a systematic review of techniques. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2445–2454 e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting M, Whitaker EJ, Albandar JM. Systematic review of the in vitro effects of statins on oral and perioral microorganisms. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124:4–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar U, Aziz T, Flores-Mir C. Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials as a function of pouring time: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsani S, Mandich MA, El-Bialy TH, et al. Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:592–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passos SP, Torrealba Y, Major P, et al. In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:593–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archambault A, Lacoursiere R, Badawi H, et al. Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras-Ochoa CO, Lagunas-Martinez A, Belkind-Gerson J, et al. Toxoplasma gondii invasion and replication in astrocyte primary cultures and astrocytoma cell lines: systematic review of the literature. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:2089–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong M, Viall CA, Chamley LW. Antiphospholipid antibodies and the placenta: a systematic review of their in vitro effects and modulation by treatment. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:97–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peplow PV, Chatterjee MP. A review of the influence of growth factors and cytokines in in vitro human keratinocyte migration. Cytokine. 2013;62:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawafleh N, Hatamleh M, Elshiyab S, et al. Lithium disilicate restorations fatigue testing parameters: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:116–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsouh Fokou PV, Nyarko AK, Appiah-Opong R, et al. Ethnopharmacological reports on anti-Buruli ulcer medicinal plants in three West African countries. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;172:297–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Xu J, Guzzo TJ. Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literature. Peer J. 2017;5:e3129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnier JJ, Kellam PJ. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e771–e777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhang R, Huang J, et al. Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis BH, Quigley M. The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullis PS, Gudlaugsdottir K, Andrews J. A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, et al. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:158–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters JP, Hooft L, Grolman W, et al. Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of otorhinolaryngologic articles based on the PRISMA statement. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasiak J, Tyack Z, Ware R, et al. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management. Int Wound J. 2016;14:754–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan WK, Wigley J, Shantikumar S. The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1262–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian J, Zhang J, Ge L, et al. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;85:50–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming PS, Koletsi D, Pandis N. Blinded by PRISMA: are systematic reviewers focusing on PRISMA and ignoring other guidelines? PLoS One. 2014;9:e96407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar