Cardiac arrhythmia detection outcomes among patients monitored with the Zio patch system: a systematic literature review

References

• Olshansky B. Chapter 28 – Arrhythmias. In: Rakel D, editor. Integrative medicine. 4th ed. Atlanta (GA): Elsevier Inc.; 2018. p. 276–286.e3.
   Google Scholar
• Fung E, Jarvelin MR, Doshi RN, et al. Electrocardiographic patch devices and contemporary wireless cardiac monitoring. Front Physiol. 2015;6:149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman F, Kwan GF, Benjamin EJ. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumaran S, Krahn AD, Klein GJ, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope. Am J Med. 2003;115:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go AS, Reynolds K, Yang J, et al. Association of burden of atrial fibrillation with risk of ischemic stroke in adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The KP-RHYTHM study. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:601–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• iRhythm Technologies Inc. Zio XT indications, safety & warnings [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Jan 29]. Available from: https://www.irhythmtech.com/zio_xt_precautions
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. August 2018 510(k) Clearances [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 29]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/510kClearances/ucm619760.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lobodzinski SS, Laks MM. New devices for very long-term ECG monitoring. Cardiol J. 2012;19:210–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussault C, Toeg H, Nathan M, et al. Electrocardiographic monitoring for detecting atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korompoki E, Del Giudice A, Hillman S, et al. Cardiac monitoring for detection of atrial fibrillation after TIA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:33–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger ML, Martin BC, Husereau D, et al. A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health. 2014;17:143–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motheral B, Brooks J, Clark MA, et al. A checklist for retrospective database studies – report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases. Value Health. 2003;6:90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaura AK, Lenane JL, Sztriha LS, et al. Early prolonged ambulatory cardiac monitoring in stroke (EPACS) – an open-label randomised controlled trial. Europace. 2017;19:i6.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett PM, Komatireddy R, Haaser S, et al. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. Am J Med. 2014;127:95.e11–e17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J, Snyder C. Ambulatory arrhythmia detection with Zio XT Patch in pediatric patients. Cardiol Young. 2017;27:S1–S653.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg MA, Samuel M, Thosani A, et al. Use of a noninvasive continuous monitoring device in the management of atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:328–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rho R, Vossler M, Blancher S, et al. Comparison of 2 ambulatory patch ECG monitors: the benefit of the P-wave and signal clarity. Am Heart J. 2018;203:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandratheva A, Pleming J, Dados A, et al. New versus conventional non invasive cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation detection in TIA clinic. Eur Stroke J. 2017;2:117.
   Google Scholar
• Bolourchi M, Batra AS. Diagnostic yield of patch ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in children (from a national registry). Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:630–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckbert SR, Austin TR, Jensen PN, et al. Yield and consistency of arrhythmia detection with patch electrocardiographic monitoring: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51:997–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loring Z, Hanna P, Pellegrini CN. Longer ambulatory ECG monitoring increases identification of clinically significant ectopy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:592–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MJ, Grubb NR, Lang CC, et al. Diagnostic yield of an ambulatory patch monitor in patients with unexplained syncope after initial evaluation in the emergency department: the PATCH-ED study. Emerg Med J. 2018;35:477–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber D, Sattar A, Drigalla D, et al. Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for discharged emergency department patients with possible cardiac arrhythmias. WestJEM. 2014;15:194–198.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhubl SR, Waalen J, Edwards AM, et al. Effect of a home-based wearable continuous ECG monitoring patch on detection of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: the mSToPS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:146–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turakhia MP, Ullal AJ, Hoang DD, et al. Feasibility of extended ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring to identify silent atrial fibrillation in high-risk patients: the Screening Study for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation (STUDY-AF). Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:285–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineinger NE, Barrett PM, Zhang Y, et al. Identification of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation subtypes in over 13,000 individuals. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turakhia MP, Hoang DD, Zimetbaum P, et al. Diagnostic utility of a novel leadless arrhythmia monitoring device. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:520–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung CE, Su D, Turakhia MP, et al. Diagnostic yield of extended cardiac patch monitoring in patients with stroke or TIA. Front Neurol. 2015;5:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon MD, Yang J, Sung SH, et al. Incidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz KE, Lui GK, McElhinney DB, et al. Extended cardiac ambulatory rhythm monitoring in adults with congenital heart disease: arrhythmia detection and impact of extended monitoring. Congenit Heart Dis. 2019. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney MR, Norby FL, Koene RJ, et al. Excessive supraventricular ectopic activity and cognitive function: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2018;136:A16492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norby FL, Rooney MR, Gutierrez A, et al. Higher atrial fibrillation burden is independently associated with lower cognitive function: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:S261.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan MA, Norby FL, Rooney M, et al. Prevalence of subclinical atrial fibrillation in the elderly population: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:S455.
   Google Scholar
• May JW, Carter EL, Hitt JR, et al. Clinical impact of a novel ambulatory rhythm monitor in children. Cardiol Young. 2018;28:1134–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg EE, Carlson SK, Doshi RN, et al. Chronic ambulatory monitoring: results of a large single-center experience. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2014;5:1818–1823.
   Google Scholar
• Hannun AY, Rajpurkar P, Haghpanahi M, et al. Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat Med. 2019;25:65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Quality Ontario. Long-term continuous ambulatory ECG monitors and external cardiac loop recorders for cardiac arrhythmia: a health technology assessment [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Jan 25]. Available from: http://www.hqontario.ca/evidence-to-improve-care/journal-ontario-health-technology-assessment-series
   Google Scholar
• Ramkumar S, Nerlekar N, D’Souza D, et al. Atrial fibrillation detection using single lead portable electrocardiographic monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e024178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishore A, Vail A, Majid A, et al. Detection of atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2014;45:520–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seet RC, Friedman PA, Rabinstein AA. Prolonged rhythm monitoring for the detection of occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke of unknown cause. Circulation. 2011;124:477–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold RJG, Layton A. Cost analysis and clinical outcomes of ambulatory care monitoring in Medicare patients: describing the diagnostic odyssey. JHEOR. 2015;5:161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Chen LY, Agarwal SK, Norby FL, et al. Persistent but not paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Is independently associated with lower cognitive function: ARIC study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1379–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar