Advanced search
Publication Cover
Current Medical Research and Opinion Volume 36, 2020 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
126
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Diabetes

Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system which wirelessly transmits results to compatible insulin pumps

Evaluation of the CONTOUR PLUS LINK 2.4 blood glucose monitoring system, assessed according to ISO 15197:2013 criteria

Michael CaswellConsumer Product Testing Company, Inc, Fairfield, NJ, USA;
,
Daniel BrownAscensia Diabetes Care, Valhalla, NY, USA
,
Joy FrankConsumer Product Testing Company, Inc, Fairfield, NJ, USA;
,
Jane F. WallaceAscensia Diabetes Care, Valhalla, NY, USA
&
Scott PardoAscensia Diabetes Care, Valhalla, NY, USACorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 757-764 | Received 09 Oct 2019, Accepted 22 Feb 2020, Published online: 17 Mar 2020

References

  • Schnell O, Barnard K, Bergenstal R, et al. Clinical utility of SMBG: recommendations on the use and reporting of SMBG in clinical research. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(9):1627–1633.
  • American Diabetes Association. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes – 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S61–S70.
  • Erbach M, Freckmann G, Hinzmann R, et al. Interferences and limitations in blood glucose self-testing: an overview of the current knowledge. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(5):1161–1168.
  • Freckmann G, Jendrike N, Baumstark A, et al. User performance evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems applying ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria and calculation of insulin dosing errors. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(2):683–697.
  • Ginsberg BH. Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(4):903–913.
  • Liberman A, Barnard K. Diabetes technology and the human factor. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(S1):S128–S138.
  • Campos-Náñez E, Breton MD. Effect of BGM accuracy on the clinical performance of CGM: an in-silico study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1196–1206.
  • Walsh J, Roberts R, Weber D, et al. Insulin pump and CGM usage in the United States and Germany: results of a real-world survey with 985 subjects. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(5):1103–1110.
  • International Organization for Standardization. Technical committee ISO/TC 212. Standards catalogue. ISO 15197:2013(en): in vitro diagnostic test systems – requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. (Last reviewed and confirmed 2018). Edition 2. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO. 2013-05: 46pp.
  • International Organization for Standardization. Technical committee ISO/TC 21233. ISO 15197:2003(en): in vitro diagnostic test systems – requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus (withdrawn). Edition 1. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO. 2003-05: 33pp.
  • Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, et al. Analytical performance requirements for systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose with focus on system accuracy: relevant differences among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and current FDA recommendations. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(4):885–894.
  • Pardo S, Dunne N, Simmons DA. Using radar plots to demonstrate the accuracy and precision of 6 blood glucose monitoring systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):966–969.
  • Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, et al. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(8):1143–1148.
  • Draper NR, Smith H. Applied regression analysis. 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1998.
  • King P, Peacock I, Donnelly R. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;48(5):643–648.
  • Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(4):971–980.
  • Strain W, Bluher M, Paldanius P. Clinical inertia in individualising care for diabetes: is there time to do more in type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Ther. 2014;5(2):347–354.
  • Jones J, Caird J. The usability of blood glucose meters: task performance differences between younger and older age groups. Proc Hum Factors Ergonomics Soc Annual Meet. 2017;61(1):604–608.
  • Heinemann L, Stuhr A, Brown A, et al. Self-measurement of blood glucose and continuous glucose monitoring – is there only one future?. Eur Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):24–29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.