References
- Office for Human Research Protections. International Compilation of Human Research Standards | HHS.gov [Internet]. Office for Human Research Protections; 2020 [cited 2019 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/compilation-human-research-standards/index.html
- Mikulic M. Total number registered clinical studies worldwide 2000–2019 | Statista [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 04]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/732997/number-of-registered-clinical-studies-worldwide/
- CIOMS. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans Prepared by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). Geneva (Switzerland): WHO Press; 2016.
- WMA. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects – WMA – The World Medical Association. World Medical Association; 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 03]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
- Seife C. Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):567–577.
- Bernabe R, Van Thiel G, Breekveldt N, et al. Drug regulators and ethics: which GCP issues are also ethical issues? Drug Discov. 2016;21(2):217–224.
- Bernabe R, van Thiel G, Breekveldt N, et al. Ethics in clinical trial regulation: ethically relevant issues from EMA inspection reports. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(4):637–645.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
- Vieira KAL, De Queiroz GM. Hermeneutic content analysis: a method of textual analysis [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 30]. Available from: www.ijbmm.com
- Paterson M, Higgs J, Paterson M, et al. Using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available from: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol10/iss2/9
- Tranoy K. Science and ethics – some of the main principles and problems. In: The moral import of science. Copenhagen: Sigma Forlag Distribution; 1987. p. 111.
- Merriam. Normative | Definition of Normative by Merriam-Webster [Internet] [cited 2020 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/normative
- Normative definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary [Internet] [cited 2020 Mar 10]. Available from:https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/normative
- Eurostat. Concepts | CROS [Internet]. ESS Standardisation [cited 2020 Mar 10]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/content/concepts_en
- US Department of Health and Human Services. International Compilation of Human Research Standards 2017 Edition [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/international-compilation-of-human-research-standards-2017.pdf
- Protection of Human subjects, PART 56 – Institutional Review Subpart A – General Provisions. Washington (DC): Government Printing office; 2005. pp. 301–310.
- FDA. IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation. MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2012.
- ICH. E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1) Guidance for Industry E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 04]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htmand/orhttp://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm
- Official Journal of the European Union. Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC; 2003. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/reg_2014_536/reg_2014_536_en.pdf
- Nordic Trial Alliance Working Group on Ethics. Nordforsk–Nordic Trial Alliance Report on the Ethical Review Process for Clinical Trials in the Nordic Countries The Challenges and Opportunities of the New Clinical Trials Regulation. Nordic Trial Alliance Working Group on Ethics; 2016. Available from: https://nta.nordforsk.org/files/NordForsk_NTAREPORT_Ethics.pdf
- Bain LE. Ethics approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28:1937–8688.
- de la Bernabe RC, van Thiel GJMW, Breekveldt NS, et al. Regulatory sanctions for ethically relevant GCP violations. Drug Discov Today. 2019; 24(11):2116–2119.
- Bernabe R, van Thiel G, Gispen C, et al. The ambivalent place of ethics in European regulatory documents. Drug Discov Today. 2017;23(2):205–207.
- Klitzman RL. Local IRBs vs. federal agencies: shifting dynamics, systems, and relationships. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012;7(3):50–62.
- Southerington T. EU Clinical Trials Regulations 536/2014 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Sep 04]. Available from: https://tukija.fi/documents/1481661/1537380/Southerington_Art9+IRB+EC.pdf/d537e4f0-eb14-43ec-930f-90bcbd0bfa77/Southerington_Art9+IRB+EC.pdf
- WHO. Guidelines for good clinical practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products. Annex 3 of The Use of Essential Drugs Sixth report of the WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995. p. 97–137. Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/en/
- EMA. Reflection paper on ethical and GCP aspects of clinical trials of medicinal products for human use conducted outside of the EU/EEA and submitted in marketing authorisation applications to the EU Regulatory Authorities. Euro Med Agency. 2012;44:437. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2012/04/WC500125437.pdf.