210
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

A multicenter retrospective study on evaluation of predicative factors for positive biopsy of prostate cancer in real-world setting

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1617-1625 | Received 11 Jan 2021, Accepted 25 Jun 2021, Published online: 19 Jul 2021

References

  • Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer 2018 (English version). Chin J Cancer Res. 2019;31:67–83.
  • Yu W, Zhou L. Early diagnosis of prostate cancer from the perspective of Chinese physicians. J Cancer. 2020;11(11):3264–3273.
  • Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63–89.
  • Ye D, Zhu Y. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in China: an overview and clinical implication. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015;53(4):249–252.
  • Prostate Cancer Working Group of Genitourinary Cancer Committee in Chinese Anti-Cancer Association. Consensus of prostate cancer screening. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017;55:340–342.
  • Feng R-M, Zong Y-N, Cao S-M, et al. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics? Cancer Commun. 2019;39(1):22.
  • Zhang L, Wu S, Guo L-R, et al. Diagnostic strategies and the incidence of prostate cancer: reasons for the low reported incidence of prostate cancer in China. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(1):9–13.
  • Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132.
  • Xu L, Wang J, Guo B, et al. Comparison of clinical and survival characteristics between prostate cancer patients of PSA-based screening and clinical diagnosis in China. Oncotarget. 2018;9(1):428–441.
  • van den Bergh R, Loeb S, Roobol MJ. Impact of early diagnosis of prostate cancer on survival outcomes. Eur Urol Focus. 2015;1(2):137–146.
  • Hamdy FC. Prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2001;27(3):143–151.
  • Jang JY, Kim YS. Is prostate biopsy essential to diagnose prostate cancer in the older patient with extremely high prostate-specific antigen? Korean J Urol. 2012;53(2):82–86.
  • Fang D, Ren D, Zhao C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of prostate cancer in chinese men with PSA 4-10 ng/mL who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy: the utilization of PAMD score. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:596797.
  • Descotes J-L. Diagnosis of prostate cancer. Asian J Urol. 2019;6(2):129–136.
  • Tao T, Shen D, Yuan L, et al. Establishing a novel prediction model for improving the positive rate of prostate biopsy. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(2):574–582.
  • Liu J, Dong B, Qu W, et al. Using clinical parameters to predict prostate cancer and reduce the unnecessary biopsy among patients with PSA in the gray zone. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5157.
  • Demirel HC, Davis JW. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Overview of the technique, clinical applications in prostate biopsy and future directions. Turk J Urol. 2018;44(2):93–102.
  • Wade J, Rosario DJ, Howson J, et al. Role of information in preparing men for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a qualitative study embedded in the ProtecT trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:80.
  • Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(6):876–892.
  • Groarke A, Curtis R, Walsh DMJ, et al. What predicts emotional response in men awaiting prostate biopsy? BMC Urol. 2018;18(1):27.
  • Niu X, Li J, Das SK, et al. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone. BMC Med Imaging. 2017;17(1):11.
  • Moore CM, Giganti F, Albertsen P, et al. Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations-a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):648–655.
  • Tan N, Margolis DJ, Lu DY, et al. Characteristics of detected and missed prostate cancer foci on 3-T multiparametric MRI using an endorectal coil correlated with whole-mount thin-section histopathology. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(1):W87–W92.
  • Mj R, Ew S, R K, et al. A risk-based strategy improves prostate-specific antigen-driven detection of prostate cancer [Internet]. European urology. 2010. [cited 2020 Sep 10]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19733959/.
  • Roobol MJ, van Vugt HA, Loeb S, et al. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):577–583.
  • Ankerst DP, Hoefler J, Bock S, et al. Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer. Urology. 2014;83(6):1362–1367.
  • Rk N, A T, Lh K, et al. Assessing individual risk for prostate cancer [Internet]. J Clin Oncol. 2007. [cited 2020 Sep 10]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17704405/.
  • Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, et al. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017;20(1):99–104.
  • Jia Y, Zhu L-Y, Xian Y-X, et al. Detection rate of prostate cancer following biopsy among the northern Han Chinese population: a single-center retrospective study of 1022 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):165.
  • Lo KL, Chui KL, Leung CH, et al. Outcomes of transperineal and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Hong Kong Med J. 2019;25(3):209–215.
  • Huang G-L, Kang C-H, Lee W-C, et al. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches – a single center preliminary study. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):101.
  • Elwenspoek MMC, Sheppard AL, McInnes MDF, et al. Comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy alone for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e198427.
  • Huang S, Reeves F, Preece J, et al. Significant impact of transperineal template biopsy of the prostate at a single tertiary institution. Urol Ann. 2015;7(4):428–432.
  • Ong WL, Weerakoon M, Huang S, et al. Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperineal Biopsy Collaboration experience. BJU Int. 2015;116(4):568–576.
  • Tobiume M, Yamada Y, Nakamura K, et al. Retrospective study comparing six- and twelve-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer . Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34(1):9–14.
  • Shariat SF, Roehrborn CG. Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 2008;10(4):262–280.
  • Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 1997;157(1):199–202. discussion 202–203.
  • Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager DE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol. 2000;164(2):388–392.
  • Zhang K, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Prostate cancer screening in Europe and Asia. Asian J Urol. 2017;4(2):86–95.
  • Egawa S, Matsumoto K, Yoshida K, et al. Results of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies and clinical significance of Japanese prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28(11):666–672.
  • Shim HB, Lee SE, Park HK, et al. Accuracy of a high prostate-specific antigen level for prostate cancer diagnosis upon initial biopsy in Korean men. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48(4):678–683.
  • Lam S, A K, M A, et al. The PICTURE study: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men requiring a repeat prostate biopsy. Br J Cancer. 2017;116:1159–1165.
  • Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):815–822.
  • Taitt HE. Global trends and prostate cancer: a review of incidence, detection, and mortality as influenced by race, ethnicity, and geographic location. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(6):1807–1823.
  • Ujike T, Uemura M, Kawashima A, et al. A novel model to predict positive prostate biopsy based on serum androgen level. Endocrine-Related Cancer. 2018(1);25:59–67.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.