References
- Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–3104.
- Geddes JS. Calcium antagonists and beta blockade–a useful combination. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59 (Suppl 2):62–69.
- Schrader J, Salvetti A, Calvo C, et al. The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(2):217–225.
- Drummond W, Munger MA, Rafique Essop M, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren as add-on therapy in patients not responding to amlodipine monotherapy. J Clin Hypertens Greenwich Conn. 2007;9(10):742–750.
- EudraCT Number: 2019-000751-13. EU Clinical Trials Register; [cited 2021 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-000751-13/PL.
- Neldam S, Lang M, Jones R. Telmisartan and amlodipine single-pill combinations vs amlodipine monotherapy for superior blood pressure lowering and improved tolerability in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: results of the TEAMSTA-5 study. J Clin Hypertens Greenwich Conn. 2011;13(7):459–466.
- Phillippo DM, Ades AE, Dias S, et al. Methods for population-adjusted indirect comparisons in health technology appraisal. Med Decis Making. 2018;38(2):200–211.
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
- Boehringer Ingelheim. An Eight-week Randomized, 4-arm, Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Combinations of Telmisartan 40mg + Amlodipine 5mg Versus Telmisartan 80mg + Amlodipine 5mg Versus Amlodipine 5mg Versus Amlodipine 10mg Monotherapy in Patients With Hypertension Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Treatment With Amlodipine 5mg Monotherapy. Clinical Trial Registration NCT00558428, clinicaltrials.gov; [cited 2014 Oct 17]. Available from:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00558428.
- Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898.
- Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, et al. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(6):683–691.
- Lumley T. Network Meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2313–2324.
- Caro JJ, Ishak KJ. No head-to-head trial? Simulate the missing arms. PharmacoEconomics. 2010;28(10):957–967.
- Ishak KJ, Proskorovsky I, Benedict A. Simulation and matching-based approaches for indirect comparison of treatments. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33(6):537–549.
- Phillippo DM, Dias S, Ades AE, et al. Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: a simulation study. Stat Med. 2020;39(30):4885–4911.
- Phillippo D, Ades AE, Dias S, et al. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 18: Methods for population-adjusted indirect comparisons in submission to NICE. 2016. Available from: http://nicedsu.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Population-adjustment-TSD-FINAL.pdf
- Campo C, Segura J, Ruilope LM. Factors influencing the systolic blood pressure response to drug therapy. J Clin Hypertens. 2002;4(1):35–40.
- Kario K, Robbins J, Jeffers BW. Titration of amlodipine to higher doses: a comparison of Asian and Western experience. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013; 9:695–701.
- Lindhorst J, Alexander N, Blignaut J, et al. Differences in hypertension between blacks and whites: an overview. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2007;18(4):241–247.