1,698
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Medical Publishing

Recommendations to medical journals on ways to encourage statistical experts to review submissions

ORCID Icon
Pages 1553-1554 | Received 10 Apr 2022, Accepted 20 Jun 2022, Published online: 10 Jul 2022

References

  • Diong J, Butler AA, Gandevia SC, et al. Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202121.
  • Zapf A, Huebner M, Rauch G, et al. What makes a biostatistician? Stat Med. 2019;38(4):695–701.
  • Ordak M. COVID-19 research: quality of biostatistics. Arch Med Sci. 2022;18(1):257–259.
  • Goodman SN, Altman DG, George SL. Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(11):753–756.
  • Hardwicke TE, Goodman SN. How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239598.
  • Ordak M. Critical image of statistical analyses in medicine between 2006 and 2018. Proceeding of the 62nd ISI World Statistics Congress 2019, Contributed Paper Session 1, Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM), 23–30, CPS694.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.