Development and validation of claims-based algorithms to identify pregnancy based on data from a university hospital in Japan

References

• Ben-Aharon I, Shalgi R. What lies behind chemotherapy-induced ovarian toxicity? Reproduction. 2012;144(2):153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Liu J, Chen K, et al. What lies behind chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea for breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145(1):113–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavos A, Valachis A. Risk of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncol. 2016;55(6):664–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1994–2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki N. Clinical practice guidelines for fertility preservation in pediatric, adolescent, and young adults with cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24(1):20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun DS, Lund JL, Stürmer T. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety’s special issue on validation studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(2):123–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koram N, Delgado M, Stark JH, et al. Validation studies of claims data in the Asia-Pacific region: a comprehensive review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(2):156–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa T, Obara T, Nishigori H, et al. Development of algorithms to determine the onset of pregnancy and delivery date using health care administrative data in a university hospital in Japan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(7):751–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis AV, Palmsten K, Andrade SE, et al. Beginning and duration of pregnancy in automated health care databases: review of estimation methods and validation results. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(4):335–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schink T, Wentzell N, Dathe K, et al. Estimating the beginning of pregnancy in German claims data: development of an algorithm with a focus on the expected delivery date. Front Public Health. 2020;8:350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade SE, Shinde M, Moore Simas TA, et al. Validation of an ICD-10-based algorithm to identify stillbirth in the sentinel system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(9):1175–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornbrook MC, Whitlock EP, Berg CJ, et al. Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes in an integrated health care delivery system. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):908–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse SR, Farkas DK, Lohse N, et al. Validation of spontaneous abortion diagnoses in the danish national registry of patients. Clin Epidemiol. 2010;2:247–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Likis FE, Sathe NA, Carnahan R, et al. A systematic review of validated methods to capture stillbirth and spontaneous abortion using administrative or claims data. Vaccine. 2013;31 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):K74–K82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wentzell N, Schink T, Haug U, et al. Optimizing an algorithm for the identification and classification of pregnancy outcomes in German claims data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(9):1005–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naleway AL, Gold R, Kurosky S, et al. Identifying pregnancy episodes, outcomes, and mother-infant pairs in the vaccine safety datalink. Vaccine. 2013;31(27):2898–2903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matcho A, Ryan P, Fife D, et al. Inferring pregnancy episodes and outcomes within a network of observational databases. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik DS, Gould JB, Profit J. Perinatal risk factors and outcome coding in clinical and administrative databases. Pediatrics. 2019;143(2):e20181487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll K, Wong HL, Fingar K, et al. Validating claims-based algorithms determining pregnancy outcomes and gestational age using a linked claims-electronic medical record database. Drug Saf. 2021;44(11):1151–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima K, Ishikawa T, Matsuzaki F, et al. Validity of administrative data for identifying birth-related outcomes with the end date of pregnancy in a Japanese university hospital. IJERPH. 2022;19(8):4864.
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu C, Bando H, Kato T, et al. Physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding fertility issues for young breast cancer patients: a national survey for breast care specialists. Breast Cancer. 2013;20(3):230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furui T, Takai Y, Kimura F, et al. Fertility preservation in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: from a part of a national survey on oncofertility in Japan. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18(1):97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, et al. Prospective study of fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(11):1151–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini M, Fontana V, Massarotti C, et al. Prospective study to optimize care and improve knowledge on ovarian function and/or fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients: results of the pilot phase of the PREgnancy and FERtility (PREFER) study. Breast. 2018;41:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri M, Pagan E, Bagnardi V, et al. Fertility concerns, preservation strategies and quality of life in young women with breast cancer: baseline results from an ongoing prospective cohort study in selected European centers. Breast. 2019;47:85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Tang L, Li P, et al. An investigation into the reproductive concerns of young women with breast cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022;9(6):100055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima K, Tsuchiya M, Ishikawa T, et al. Real-world anticancer medications for reproductive-age women with breast cancer by using a claims database in Japan. Future Oncol. 2021;17(15):1907–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Support for Infertility Treatment (in Japanese). Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare; 2022 April [cited 2022 July 2]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kodomo/kodomo_kosodate/boshi-hoken/funin-01.html
   Google Scholar
• Chubak J, Pocobelli G, Weiss NS. Tradeoffs between accuracy measures for electronic health care data algorithms. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(3):343.e2–349.e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar