Development and validation of a RASS-related nomogram to predict the in-hospital mortality of neurocritical patients: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC-IV clinical database

References

• Raj R, Bendel S, Reinikainen M, et al. Costs, outcome and cost-effectiveness of neurocritical care: a multi-center observational study. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pelosi P, Ferguson ND, Frutos-Vivar F, et al. Management and outcome of mechanically ventilated neurologic patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(6):1482–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali KM, Salih MH, AbuGabal HH, et al. Outcome of neurocritical disorders, a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. Brain Behav. 2022;12(3):e2540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatasubba Rao CP, Suarez JI, Martin RH, et al. Global survey of outcomes of neurocritical care patients: analysis of the PRINCE study part 2. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(1):88–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broessner G, Helbok R, Lackner P, et al. Survival and long-term functional outcome in 1,155 consecutive neurocritical care patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9):2025–2030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiphuth IC, Schellinger PD, Kohrmann M, et al. Predictors for good functional outcome after neurocritical care. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busl KM, Bleck TP, Varelas PN. Neurocritical care outcomes, research, and technology: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(5):612–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957–2963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Wang M, Liu Y, et al. Module modified acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II: predicting the mortality of neuro-critical disease. Neurol Res. 2014;36(12):1099–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta R, trainee GP, Chinthapalli K, et al. Glasgow coma scale explained. BMJ. 2019;365:l1296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reith FCM, Brennan PM, Maas AIR, et al. Lack of standardization in the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale: results of international surveys. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(1):89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi V, Iyer VN. Utility of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in evaluation of acute neurologic dysfunction in the intensive care unit. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(5):E292–E294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green SM. Cheerio, laddie! Bidding farewell to the Glasgow Coma Scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(5):427–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SB, Kress JP. Sedation and analgesia in the mechanically ventilated patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(5):486–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, et al. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale (RASS). JAMA. 2003;289(22):2983–2991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirski MA, LeDroux SN, Lewin JJ, 3rd, et al. Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(8):1674–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan X, Xiao L, Liao M, et al. The validity, reliability and feasibility of four instruments for assessing the consciousness of stroke patients in a neurological intensive care unit compared. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the neurocritical care society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(9):1189–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson A, Bulgarelli L, Pollard T, et al. MIMIC-IV (version 0.4). PhysioNet. 2020. Available from: https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv/0.4/
   Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W-T, Li Y-J, Feng A-Z, et al. Data mining in clinical big data: the frequently used databases, steps, and methodological models. Mil Med Res. 2021;8(1):44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350:g7594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825–e873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS, et al. The use of continuous I.V. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1998;114(2):541–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, et al. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1471–1477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reade MC, Finfer S. Sedation and delirium in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(5):444–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, et al. Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):724–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehabi Y, Chan L, Kadiman S, et al. Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(5):910–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzer F, Weiß B, Kumpf O, et al. Early deep sedation is associated with decreased in-hospital and two-year follow-up survival. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasilevskis EE, Morandi A, Boehm L, et al. Delirium and sedation recognition using validated instruments: reliability of bedside intensive care unit nursing assessments from 2007 to 2010. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(Suppl 2):S249–S55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasilevskis EE, Pandharipande PP, Graves AJ, et al. Validity of a modified sequential organ failure assessment score using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):138–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakhit S, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, et al. Multicenter international cohort validation of a modified sequential organ failure assessment score using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale. Ann Surg. 2022;276(2):e114–e119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent J-L, Takala J, Moreno RP, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale should not be used to evaluate neurologic function. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):e450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNett M, Amato S, Gianakis A, et al. The FOUR score and GCS as predictors of outcome after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(1):52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(4):585–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester JG, Harrington BM, Rudolph JL. Serial administration of a modified richmond agitation and sedation scale for delirium screening. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(5):450–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JH, Vasilevskis EE, Schnelle JF, et al. The diagnostic performance of the richmond agitation sedation scale for detecting delirium in older emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(7):878–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar