Observing expert opinion of medical affairs pharmaceutical physicians on the value of their clinical experience to the pharmaceutical industry using the Jandhyala method

References

• Silva H, Sonstein S, Stonier P, et al. Alignment of competencies to address inefficiencies in medicines development and clinical research: need for inter-professional education. Pharm Med. 2015;29(3):131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Silva H, Kerpel-Fronius S, Stonier PD, eds., et al. Grand challenges in pharmaceutical medicine: competencies and ethics in medicines development. Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA; 2021. DOI:10.3389/978-2-88966-986-8
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis D, Sake JK, Halling K, et al. Patient centricity and pharmaceutical companies: is it feasible? Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;51(4):460–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R. Professional qualifications of medical affairs pharmaceutical physicians and other internal stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry. F1000Res. 2022;11:813.
   Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R. Development of a definition for medical affairs using the Jandhyala method for observing consensus opinion among medical affairs pharmaceutical physicians. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:842431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonier PD, Silva H, Boyd A, et al. Evolution of the development of core competencies in pharmaceutical medicine and their potential use in education and training. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, et al. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: a systematic review of published definitions. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):631–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. Competency-based medical education (CBME); 2022 [cited 2022 20 May]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/medical-education/cbme.
   Google Scholar
• Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):648–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CANMed Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J. 2014. The draft CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework–series IV. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Outcomes for graduates; 2020 [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/standards-and-outcomes/outcomes-for-graduates/outcomes-for-graduates/about-the-outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker L, Johnson B. Privileged presence: personal stories of connections in health care. USA: Bull Publishing Company; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Olthuis G, Dekkers W. Medical education, palliative care and moral attitude: some objectives and future perspectives. Med Educ. 2003;37(10):928–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford GB, Zambrano SC. Junior doctors’ views of how their undergraduate clinical electives in palliative care influenced their current practice of medicine. Acad Med. 2015;90(3):338–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantatalo O, Lindberg O. Liminal practice and reflection in professional education: police education and medical education. Stud Contin Educ. 2018;40(3):351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoodie DA, Auret K. Psychological morbidity and burnout in palliative care doctors in Western Australia. Intern Med J. 2007;37(10):693–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharmal A, Morgan T, Kuhn I, et al. Palliative and end-of-life care and junior doctors: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022;12(e6):e862–e868.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenwohl-Mack S, Dohan D, Matthews T, et al. Understanding experiences of moral distress in end-of-life care among US and UK physician trainees: a comparative qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(7):1890–1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownsword R, Earnshaw JJ. The ethics of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(12):827–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt BA, Silver R, Rushton CH, et al. What keeps you up at night? Genetics professionals’ distressing experiences in patient care. Genet Med. 2010;12(5):289–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubik DJ, O'Callaghan C, Dwyer J. Strong emotional reactions for doctors working in palliative care: causes, management and impact. A qualitative study. Psychooncology. 2021;30(9):1582–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yedidia MJ. Transforming Doctor-Patient relationships to promote patient-centered care: lessons from palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;33(1):40–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Education England. Annual review of competency progression – England; 2020 [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://specialtytraining.hee.nhs.uk/ARCP.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi A, Schofield S, McAleer S, et al. The influence of postgraduate qualifications on educational identity formation of healthcare professionals. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(3):567–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Reay T. Responding to imposed job redesign: the evolving dynamics of work and identity in restructuring professional identity. Human Relat. 2021;74(10):1541–1571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quraishi S, Wade W, Black D. Development of a GMC-aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of ‘capabilities in practice’ as a curriculum model. Future Healthc J. 2019;6(3):196–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray KE, Lane JL, Carraccio C, Education in Pediatrics Across the Continuum (EPAC) Study Group, et al. Crossing the gap: using competency-based assessment to determine whether learners are ready for the undergraduate-to-Graduate transition. Acad Med. 2019;94(3):338–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasakis E. A meta-synthesis of how registered nurses make sense of their lived experiences of MedicationE. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(17–18):3077–3095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, et al. Coping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals’ psychological well-being. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan C, Ross S, Davey P, et al. Junior doctors’ perceptions of their self-efficacy in prescribing, their prescribing errors and the possible causes of errors. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(6):980–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruta J, Ozone S, Hamano J. Doctors’ professional identity and socialisation from medical students to staff doctors in Japan: narrative analysis in qualitative research from a family physician perspective. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva H, Stonier P, Buhler F, et al. Core competencies for pharmaceutical physicians and drug development scientists. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm O. Curriculum transformation: from didactic to competency-based programs in pharmaceutical medicine. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnetzler G, Bremgartner MF, Grossmann Straessle R, et al. Evolution to a competency-based training curriculum for pharmaceutical medicine physicians in Switzerland. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine. Pharmaceutical medicine ARCP decision aid 2021; 2020 [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: https://www.fpm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/20210714-ARCP-decision-aid_C21_final-1.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois DJ, Jurczynska A, Kerpel-Fronius S, et al. Fostering competence in medicines development: the IFAPP perspective. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R. The multiple stakeholder approach to Real-Eorld evidence (RWE) generation: observing multidisciplinary expert consensus on quality indicators of rare disease patient registries (RDRs). Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(7):1249–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R. A medicine adoption model for assessing the expected effects of additional real-world evidence (RWE) at product launch. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(9):1645–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R. Development and validation of the medical affairs pharmaceutical physician value (MAPPval) instrument. Pharm Med. 2022. DOI:10.1007/s40290-021-00413-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese J, Li LC, Nimmon L, et al. Moving beyond “untl saturation was reached”: critically examining how saturation is used and reported in qualitative research. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(9):1225–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth D. Delphi technique. In Levine J, Hogg M, editors. Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2009. p. 195–197
   Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R. A novel method for observing proportional group awareness and consensus of items arising from list-generating questioning. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(5):883–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R. Delphi, non-RAND modified Delphi, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and a novel group awareness and consensus methodology for consensus measurement: a systematic literature review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(11):1873–1887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandhyala R, 19QoL PAC. Design, validation and implementation of the post-acute (long) COVID-19 quality of life (PAC-19QoL) instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damy T, Conceição I, García-Pavía P, et al. A simple core dataset and disease severity score for hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2021;28(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S. Bridging the gap between R&D and commercialization in pharmaceutical industry: role of medical affairs and medical communications. Int J Clin Biomed Res. 2017;3(3):44–49.
   Google Scholar
• D’arcy E. Presence, alignments and shared authenticity: considering the new era of engagement between experts and the pharmaceutical industry; 2009 [cited 2022 May 20]. DOI:10.1057/jmm.2009.14
   Google Scholar
• Trenaman L, Boonen A, Guillemin F, et al. OMERACT quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) working group: do current QALY measures capture what matters to patients? J Rheumatol. 2017;44(12):1899–1903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse A, Garau M. Appraising ultra-orphan drugs: is cost-per-QALY appropriate? A review of the evidence. Office of Health Economics Consulting Report Number 468. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Tasker F, Newbery N, Burr B, et al. Survey of core medical trainees in the United Kingdom 2013 – inconsistencies in training experience and competing with service demands. Clin Med. 2014;14(2):149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar