Gender differences in pulmonology and critical care authorship and editorial boards

References

• Huang J, Gates AJ, Sinatra R, et al. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(9):4609–4616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics UIf. Women in science. UNESCO. [accessed 2022 September]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375033?6=null&queryId=2e0065e7-18f6-4e94-a10b-5fb9fb8e3229.
   Google Scholar
• Santhosh L, Babik JM. Diversity in the pulmonary and critical care medicine pipeline. Trends in gender, race, and ethnicity among applicants and fellows. ATS Sch. 2020;1(2):152–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, et al. The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature — a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinho-Gomes AC, Vassallo A, Thompson K, et al. Representation of women among editors in chief of leading medical journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(9):e2123026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee P, Werner RM. Gender disparity in citations in high-impact journal articles. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(7):e2114509-e2114509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner G, Rupp A, Exadaktylos AK, et al. Gender distribution in board memberships of emergency medicine societies. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;47:176–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JS, Weber KL, Samora JB. How does representation of women on editorial boards compare among orthopaedic, general surgery, and internal medicine journals? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(9):1939–1946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puri K, First LR, Kemper AR. Trends in gender distribution among authors of research studies in pediatrics: 2015-2019. Pediatrics. 2021;147(4):e2020040873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenja R, Nathalie M, Basil R, et al. Gender distribution in boards of intensive care medicine societies. J Crit Care. 2021;68:157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert TW, Smith F, Goldacre MJ. Career specialty choices of UK medical graduates of 2015 compared with earlier cohorts: questionnaire surveys. Postgrad Med J. 2018;94(1110):191–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramian O, Mills N, Stephen MJ. FIRST: female inequality represented in subspecialty training-the gender divide in pulmonary critical care medicine. A23 emerging strategies to train medical professionals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:A1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodhi MU, Sabzwari AA, Khan MA, et al. 1045: women in leadership positions in academic pulmonary and critical care medicine in the United states. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(1):502.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson CC, Riekert KA, Bates CK, et al. Addressing gender inequality in our disciplines: report from the association of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep division chiefs. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(12):1382–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta S, Burns KEA, Machado FR, et al. Gender parity in critical care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(4):425–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ApS D. Determine the gender of name. [accessed 2022 Sep 23]. https://genderize.io/.
   Google Scholar
• Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, et al. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. Jama. Sep. 2015;314(11):1149–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley JT, Adamson R. Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: a literature review. Special report. 2003. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED478916
   Google Scholar
• Mylavarapu P, Gupta NE, Gudi V, et al. Diversity within the most competitive internal medicine fellowships: examining trends from 2008 to 2018. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(9):2537–2544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casad BJ, Franks JE, Garasky CE, et al. Gender inequality in academia: problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. J Neurosci Res. 2021;99(1):13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson EM, Kennedy CC, Kelm DJ. Assessment of gender parity: leadership representation in pulmonary and critical care medicine. J Womens Health. 2022;31(3):439–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh B, Mehta S, Angus DC, et al. Women in intensive care study: a preliminary assessment of international data on female representation in the ICU physician workforce, leadership and academic positions. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson EM, Kennedy CC, Kelm DJ. Gender parity among pulmonary critical care medicine leadership. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:A440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynaud M, Goutaudier V, Louis K, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publication dynamics and non-COVID-19 research production. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muric G, Lerman K, Ferrara E. Gender disparity in the authorship of biomedical research publications during the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(4):e25379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chary S, Amrein K, Soeteman DI, et al. Gender disparity in critical care publications: a novel female first author index. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Thomas SM, Antony J, et al. Strategies to prevent or reduce gender bias in peer review of research grants: a rapid scoping review. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature. Editorial criteria and processes. Nature. [accessed 2022 Sep 23]. https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/editorial-criteria-and-processes.
   Google Scholar
• Camacci ML, Lu A, Lehman EB, et al. Association between sex composition and publication productivity of journal editorial and professional society board members in ophthalmology. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(5):451–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick AJ, Baruah R. Gender disparity and implicit gender bias amongst doctors in intensive care medicine: a ‘disease’ we need to recognise and treat. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020;21(1):12–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar