References
- Rohwer A, Young T, Wager E, et al. Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/Middle-income country health researchers. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018467.
- Stretton S, Bramich NJ, Keys JR, et al. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(10):1575–1583.
- Hvistendahl M. China’s publication bazaar. Science. 2013;342(6162):1035–1039.
- Ghajarzadeh M. Guest authors in an Iranian journal. Dev World Bioeth. 2014;14(1):15–19.
- Misra DP, Ravindran V, Agarwal V. Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: challenges and opportunities for improvement. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(46):e287.
- Qi X, Deng H, Guo X. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1102):499–503.
- Gaudino M, Robinson NB, Audisio K, et al. Trends and characteristics of retracted articles in the biomedical literature, 1971 to 2020. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(8):1118–1121.
- Kretser A, Murphy D, Bertuzzi S, et al. Scientific integrity principles and best practices: recommendations from a scientific integrity consortium. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25(2):327–355.
- Tai MCT, Lin CS. Developing a culturally relevant bioethics for asian people. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(1):51–54.
- Hesp BR, Arai K, Chu MYS, et al. A guide to applying the good publication practice 3 guidelines in the Asia-Pacific region. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:21.
- Schroter S, Montagni I, Loder E, et al. Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e036899.
- Armond ACV, Gordijn B, Lewis J, et al. A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(1):50.
- Jull A, Walker N. Trial registration and time to publication in a retrospective cohort of publicly funded randomised controlled trials in New Zealand 1999–2017. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e065050.
- Singhal S, Kalra BS. Publication ethics: role and responsibility of authors. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2021;40(1):65–71.
- Zhang J, Ge Y, Wang J, et al. Challenges and growth opportunities: the landscape of chinese medical publication professionals in the global context: a questionnaire-based survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(2):261–267.
- Yi N, Nemery B, Dierickx K. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents. Dev World Bioeth. 2019;19(2):64–75.
- Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research Network. 2023. https://www.equator-network.org/
- Alshogran OY, Al-Delaimy WK. Understanding of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors authorship criteria among faculty members of pharmacy and other health sciences in Jordan. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018;13(3):276–284.
- Aldughmi M, Qutaishat D, Karasneh R. Knowledge and perceptions of honorary authorship among health care researchers: online cross-sectional survey data from the Middle East. Sci Eng Ethics. 2021;27(3):39.
- Lee J, Carruthers A, Chung H, et al. Familiarity and implementation of global publication guidelines in Asia-Pacific (APAC): a cross-sectional survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023;39(S1):S21.
- DeTora LM, Toroser D, Sykes A, et al. Good publication practice (GPP) guidelines for company-sponsored biomedical research: 2022 update. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(9):1298–1304.
- Battisti WP, Wager L, Baltzer L, et al. Good publication practice for communicating company-sponsored medical research: GPP3. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(6):461–464.
- Foster C, Wager E, Marchington J, et al. Good practice for conference abstracts and presentations: GPCAP. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:11.
- Aleksovska K, Bassetti CLA, Berger T, Guideline Production Group of the European Academy of Neurology, et al. T. Guidelines should be guidelines: time to leave the terms “consensus” and “position” for other purposes. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(8):2461–2466.
- Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders [Internet]. Canberra, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2023. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/resources/ethical-conduct-research-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples-and-communities
- National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants [Internet]. New Dehli, India: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2023. https://ethics.ncdirindia.org/asset/pdf/ICMR_National_Ethical_Guidelines.pdf
- Akabayashi A. Research regulations, ethics committees, and confronting global standards. In: Bioethics across the globe: rebirthing bioethics. Springer: Singapore; 2020. p. 75–87.
- Guidelines for researchers on health research involving Māori [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: Health Research Council. 2023. https://gateway.hrc.govt.nz/funding/downloads/Guidelines_for_researchers_on_health_research_involving_Māori.pdf
- Pacific health research guidelines [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: Health Research Council. 2023. https://gateway.hrc.govt.nz/funding/downloads/Pacific_health_research_guidelines.pdf
- Ethics guidelines for human biomedical research (2021 revised) [Internet]. Singapore: Bioethics Advisory Committee Singapore. 2023. https://file.go.gov.sg/bacethicsguidelines2021-a4.pdf
- Joint position on the publication of clinical trial results in the scientific literature [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations; International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations; Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association [Internet]; and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. 2023. https://ifpma.org/publications/clinical-trials-position-papers/
- Joint statement on public disclosure of results from clinical trials. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2023. https://www.who.int/news/item/18-05-2017-joint-statement-on-registration
- Gehanno J-F, Grosjean J, Darmoni SJ, et al. Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0264661.
- Dinis-Oliveira RJ. COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science. Forensic Sci Res. 2020;5(2):174–187.
- Kirkham JJ, Penfold NC, Murphy F, et al. Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e041849.
- Official guidance on authorship of peer-review publications in which coronavirus disease has impacted author responsiveness [Internet]. Tarrytown NY, USA: International Society for Medical Publication Professionals; 2023. https://www.ismpp.org/assets/images/ISMPP%20Official%20Guidance%20on%20Authorship%20and%20Coronavirus.pdf
- Peebles E, Scandlyn M, Hesp BR. A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237804.
- Hesp BR, Scandlyn M. Ethical challenges in acknowledging professional medical writing support. Medical Writ. 2020;29:60–62.
- American Medical Writers Association, European Medical Writers Assocation, International Society for Medical Publication Professionals AMWA–EMWA–ISMPP joint position statement on the role of professional medical writers. Med Writ. 2017;26:267–268.
- Defining the role of authors and contributors [Internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2023. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
- Carpenter CR, Cone DC, Sarli CC. Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(10):1160–1172.
- Journals [Internet]. Think, Check, Submit; 2023. https://thinkchecksubmit.org/journals/
- Directory of Open Access Journals [Internet]. 2023. https://doaj.org/
- Enhanced publications options navigator. Medical Publishing Insights & Practices; 2023. www.mpip-initiative.org/transparencymatters/epon.html
- Books & chapters [Internet]. Think, Check, Submit; 2023. https://thinkchecksubmit.org/books-and-chapters/
- Gattrell WT, Hopewell S, Young K, et al. Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e010329.
- Evuarherhe O, Gattrell W, White R, et al. Professional medical writing support and the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting: a systematic review. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:14.
- Randomised trials in The Lancet: formatting guidelines [Internet]. London, UK: the Lancet; 2023. https://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet/authors/RCTguidelines-1651580391720.pdf
- Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals [Internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; 2022. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
- Maritsch F, Cil I, McKinnon C, et al. Data privacy protection in scientific publications: process implementation at a pharmaceutical company. BMC Med Ethics. 2022;23(1):65.
- Tucker K, Branson J, Dilleen M, et al. Protecting patient privacy when sharing patient-level data from clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(S1):77.
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1:42–58.
- Disclosure of financial and non-financial relationships and activities, and conflicts of interest [Internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; 2023. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities--conflicts-of-interest.html
- Gainey KM, Smith J, McCaffery KJ, et al. What author instructions do health journals provide for writing plain language summaries? A scoping review. Patient. 2022;16(1):31–42.
- Carruthers A, Chung H, Crawford R, et al. Author language and communication preferences for providing feedback on English-language publications in APAC: a cross-sectional survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023;39(S1):S10.
- Cobey KD, Monfaredi Z, Poole E, et al. Editors-in-chief perceptions of patients as (co) authors on publications and the acceptability of ICMJE authorship criteria: a cross-sectional survey. Res Involv Engagem. 2021;7(1):39.
- Good Publication Practice Guidelines. Summary for patient authors [Internet]. Envision the Patient; 2023. https://figshare.com/articles/poster/Plain_Language_Summary_of_Good_Publication_Practice_Guideline/11292047/1
- Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development; 2023. https://www.amed.go.jp/en/ppi/index.html
- Carfagno ML, Schweers SA, Whann EA, et al. Building consensus on author selection practices for industry-sponsored research: recommendations from an expert task force of medical publication professionals. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38(6):863–870.
- ISMPP authorship alogirthm tool [Internet]. Tarrytown, NY, USA: International Society for Medical Publication Professionals; 2023. https://www.ismpp.org/ismpp-authorship-algorithm-tool
- Brand A, Allen L, Altman M, et al. Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learn Pub. 2015;28(2):151–155.
- Jones S, Cairns A. Author agreements–what to include and why. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(Suppl 1):S1–S16.
- Olesen A, Amin L, Mahadi Z. Unethical authorship practices: a qualitative study in malaysian higher education institutions. Dev World Bioeth. 2018;18(3):271–278.
- Olesen AP, Amin L, Mahadi Z, et al. Exploring the organisational context of research misconduct in higher learning institutions in Malaysia. Dev World Bioeth. 2022;22(2):76–85.
- Olesen AP, Amin L, Mahadi Z. Research ethics: researchers consider how best to prevent misconduct in research in Malaysian higher learning institutions through ethics education. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25(4):1111–1124.
- Kwong JS, Chen H, Sun X. Development of evidence-based recommendations: implications for preparing expert consensus statements. Chin Med J. 2016;129(24):2998–3000.