References
- The Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information. phactMI medical information code of practice; 2002 [cited 2002 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.phactmi.org/code-of-practice.
- Shamasunder S, Holmes SM, Goronga T, et al. Covid-19 reveals weak health systems by design: why we must re-make global health in this historic moment. Glob Public Health. 2020;15(7):1083–1089.
- WHO. Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at age 60 (years); 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24] Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-ghe-hale-healthy-life-expectancy-at-age-60.
- Lievrouw LA, Farb SE. Information and equity. Ann Rev Info Sci Tech. 2005;37(1):499–540.
- WHO. Social determinants of health; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_3.
- OECD. Understanding the digital divide; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf.
- UNCTAD.org. The COVID-19 crisis: accentuating the need to bridge digital divides. Available from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlinf2020d1_en.pdf.
- Campbell D. Can the digital divide be contained? International Labour Review. 2001;140(2):119–141.
- Riggins FJ, Dewan S, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota. The digital divide: current and future research directions. JAIS. 2005;6(12):298–337.
- Newhagen J, Bucy E. Routes to media access. In: Bucy E, editor. Living in the information age. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning; 2005. p. 221–230.
- van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media Soc. 2019;21(2):354–375.
- van Deursen AJ, Helsper EJ. The third-level digital divide: who benefits most from being online? In: Robinson L, Cotton S, Schulz J, Hale T, Williams A, editors. Communication and information technologies annual. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2015. p. 29–52.
- van Dijk JAGM. The deepening divide: inequality in the information society. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2005.
- Warschauer M. Dissecting the “digital divide”: a case study in Egypt. Inf Soc. 2003;19(4):297–304.
- ITU. Measuring digital development: offline population; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://itu.foleon.com/itu/measuring-digital-development/offline-population.
- GSMA. Connected women: the mobile gender gap report 2020; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GSMA-The-Mobile-Gender-Gap-Report-2020.pdf.
- ITU. Measuring digital development: facts and figures 2020; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2020.pdf.
- FRA. What do fundamental rights mean for people in the EU?; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2020/fundamental-rights-survey-trust.
- Perrin A, Atske S. Americans with disabilities less likely than those without to own some digital devices; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/10/americans-with-disabilities-less-likely-than-those-without-to-own-some-digital-devices/.
- Holmes H, Burgess G. Coronavirus has intensified the UK’s digital divide; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/digitaldivide.
- Joosten EAG, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, et al. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219–226.
- Albano D, Follman S, Patel YD, et al. Enhancing patient care: value of pharmaceutical medical information services. J Nurse Practit. 2021;17(7):840–845.
- American Library Association. Principles for the networked world; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.ala.org/advocacy/sites/ala.org.advocacy/files/content/advleg/pp/pub/briefs/principles.pdf.
- Pitts PJ, Freeman E. Health literacy: the common denominator of healthcare progress. Patient. 2021;14(5):455–458.
- Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and user’s guide; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/patient-education/pemat1.html.
- Wang LW, Miller MJ, Schmitt MR, et al. Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013;9(5):503–516.
- Matthews T, Sewell J. State official’s guide to health literacy; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/alphtn/assets/060110literacyguide.pdf
- Indian Health Service (IHS). Readability tools; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.ihs.gov/sites/healthcommunications/themes/responsive2017/display_objects/documents/Readability_Tools.pdf.
- Wright JP, Edwards GC, Goggins K, et al. Association of health literacy with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(2):137–142.
- Bennett IM, Chen J, Soroui JS, et al. The contribution of health literacy to disparities in Self-Rated health status and preventive health behaviors in older adults. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(3):204–211.
- Azraii AB, Ramli AS, Ismail Z, et al. Knowledge, awareness and practice regarding familial hypercholesterolaemia among primary care physicians in Malaysia: the importance of professional training. Atherosclerosis. 2018;277:508–516.
- Pérez-Stable EJ, El-Toukhy S. Communicating with diverse patients: how patient and clinician factors affect disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(12):2186–2194.
- American Medical Association. Four ways medical education is working toward health equity; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/education/medical-school-diversity/4-ways-medical-education-working-toward-health-equity.