References
- James ED. The behaviour of the bladder during physical activity. Br J Urol 1978; 50: 387–94.
- Thin-off JVV, Jonas U, Frohneberg D, Petri E, Hohen-fellner R. Telemetric urodynamic investigations in normal males. Urol Int 1980; 35: 427–34.
- Wanner K, Haeussermann G, Eisenberger F, Faust U. Urol Res 1981; 9: 187–91.
- Bhatia NN, Bradley WE, Haldeman S, Johnson BK. Continuous ambulatory urodynamic monitoring. Br J Urol 1982; 54: 357–9.
- Bhatia NN, Bradley WE, Haldeman S. Urodynamics: continuous monitoring. J Urol 1982; 128: 963–8.
- Van Waalwijk, van Doom ESC, Remmers A, Janknegt RA. Conventional and extramural ambulatory uro-dynamic testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers. J Urol 1992; 147: 1319–26.
- Heslington K, Hilton P. Ambulatory monitoring and conventional cystometry in asymptomatic female volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 103: 434–41.
- Porru D, Usai E. Standard and extramural ambulatory urodynamic investigation for the diagnosis of detrusor instability-correlated incontinence and micturition disorders. Neurourol Urodyn 1994; 13: 237–42.
- Robertson AS, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD, Neal DE. Bladder function in healthy volunteers: ambulatory monitoring and conventional urodynamic studies. 1994; 73: 242–9.
- Yeung CK, Godley ML, Duffy PG, Ransley PG. Natural filling cystometry in infants and children. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 531–7.
- Vereecken RL, van Nuland T. Detrusor pressure in ambu-latory versus standard urodynamics. 1998; 17: 129–33.
- Perachino M, Puppo P. Evaluation of cervico-urethral obstruction with ambulatory pressure/flow studies: an alternative to conventional pressure/flow studies? Arch Ital Urol 1995; 57: 125–33.
- Ghoniem GM, Sakr MA, Shabaan AM, Shoukry MS, Aertker MW. Conventional, continuous, and telemetric monitoring of urodynamic parameters in non-human primates: a comparative study. Neurourol Urodyn 1996; 15: 203–14.
- Rosario DJ, Macdiarmid SA, Radley SC, Chapple CR. A comparison of ambulatory and conventional urodynamic studies in men with borderline outlet obstruction. BJU Int 1999; 83: 400–9.
- Rosario DJ, Christopher RC, Tophill PR, Woo IIH. Urodynamic assessment of the bashful bladder. J Urol 2000; 163: 215–20.
- Swithinbank LV, James M, Shepherd A, Abrams P. Role of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring in clinical uro-logical practice. Neurourol Urodyn 1999; 18: 215–22.
- Abrams P. Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Anderson JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function recommended by the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 1988; 7: 403–26.
- Groen J, van Mastrigt R, Bosch R. Factors causing differences in voiding parameters between conventional and ambulatory urodynamics. Urol Res 2000; 28: 128–31.
- Thyberg M, Spingberg A, Lassvik C. Detrusor pressure in cystometry compared to physiological filling in patients with a reflex urinary bladder after spinal cord injury. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990; 22: 145–50.
- Brading AF, Greenland JE, Mills IW, McMurray G, Symes S. Blood supply to the bladder during filling. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1999; 33 (Suppl 201): 25–31.
- Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Sassone AM. Detrusor pressure uroflowmetry studies in women: effect of a 7Fr trans-urethral catheter. J Urol 2000; 164: 109–14.
- Zinner NR. Clinical aspects of detrusor instability and the value of urodynamics. Eur Urol 1998; 34 (Suppl 1): 16–19.