References
- Zlotogora, J. Population programs for the detection of couples at risk for severe monogenic genetic diseases. Hum Genet. 2009;126:247–53.
- University of Groningen [Internet]. Groningen: Testing for serious genetic diseases now possible before pregnancy [updated 2016 January 14]. Available from: http://www.rug.nl/news-and-events/news/archief2016/nieuwsberichten/umcg-dragerschapstest?lang=en [cited 2016 March 14].
- Wilson JMG, Junger G. Principles and practice for screening of disease. Geneva: WHO; 1968.
- Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Déry V. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:317–19.
- Rogowski WH, Grosse SD, Schmidtke J, Marckmann G. Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most? Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:25–31.
- Salihu HM, Salinas A, Mogos M. The missing link in preconceptional care: the role of comparative effectiveness research. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:776–82.
- Wise PH. Transforming preconceptional, prenatal, and interconceptional care into a comprehensive commitment to women's health. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18(6 Suppl):S13–S18.
- Munthe C. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal. Bioethics. 2015;29:36–45.
- Raz AE, Vizner Y. Carrier matching and collective socialization in community genetics: Dor Yeshorim and the reinforcement of stigma. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1361–9.
- Wilfond BS, Fost N. The cystic fibrosis gene: medical and social implications for heterozygote detection. JAMA. 1990;263:2777–83.
- McQueen MJ. Some ethical and design challenges of screening programs and screening tests. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;315:41–8.
- Parens E, Asch A, editors. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
- Shakespeare T. disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge; 2006.
- Janssens S, De Paepe A, Borry, P. Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature. J Community Genet. 2014;5:13–29.
- Scully JL. Disability and genetics in the era of genomic medicine. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:797–802.
- Verweij M. Medicalization as a moral problem for preventative medicine. Bioethics. 2009;13:89–113.
- Zola IK. Medicine as an institution of social control. Soc Rev. 1972;20:487–504.
- Kukla R. Mass hysteria: medicine, culture, and mothers' bodies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 2005.
- Tremain S. Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero. Hypatia. 2006;21:35–53.
- Press N, Browner C. Risk, autonomy, and responsibility: informed consent for prenatal testing. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995;25:S9–S12.
- Lawson K. Perceptions of deservedness of social aid as a function of prenatal diagnostic testing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2003;33:76–90.
- de Jong A, Dondorp WJ, Frints SG, de Die-Smulders CE, de Wert GM. Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:657–63.
- De Wert GM, Dondorp WJ, Knoppers BM. Preconception care and genetic risk: ethical issues. J Community Genet. 2012;3:221–8.
- Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. Too many choices? Hospital and community staff reflect on the future of prenatal screening. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:743–53.
- John S. Efficiency, responsibility and disability: philosophical lessons from the savings argument for pre-natal diagnosis. Politics Philosophy & Economics. 2014;14:3–22.
- Wilkinson S. Prenatal screening, reproductive choice, and public health. Bioethics. 2015;29:26–35.
- King D. The persistence of eugenics. GenEthics News 22 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hgalert.org/topics/geneticDiscrimination/eugenics.htm [cited 2016 March 14].