Who benefits from putting family life into ice?

References

• Hovatta O, Silye R, Krausz T, Abir R, Margara R, Trew G, et al. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue using dimethylsulphoxide and propanediol-sucrose as cryoprotectants. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1268–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Fertility preservation in women. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:735–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgström B, Hreinsson J, Rasmussen C, Sheiki M, Fried G, Keros V, et al. Fertility preservation in girls with Turner syndrome – prognostic signs for presence of follicles in ovarian tissue. J Clin Endocr Metab. 2009;94:74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet. 1986;327:884–6.
   Google Scholar
• van Uem JF, Siebzehnrübl ER, Schuh B, Koch R, Trotnow S, Lang N. Birth after cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes. Lancet. 1987;329:752–3.
   Google Scholar
• Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli Ferraretti A, Trounson AC. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:3077–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Is vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients? Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1485–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaas AM, Melamed A, Chung K, Bendikson KA, Paulson RJ. Egg banking in the United States: current status of commercially available cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:827–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glujovsky D, Riestra B, Sueldo C, Fiszbajn G, Repping S, Nodar F, et al. Vitrification versus slow freezing for women undergoing oocyte cryopreservation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD010047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé M, Santaló J, Boada M, Clua E, Rodríguez I, Martínez F, et al. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2087–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paramanantham J, Talmor AJ, Osianlis T, Weston GC. Cryopreserved oocytes: update on clinical applications and success rates. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015;70:97–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potdar N, Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. Oocyte vitrification in the 21st century and post-warming fertility outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:159–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliano D, Garrido N, Serra-Serra V, Pellicer A. Difference in birth weight of consecutive sibling singletons is not found in oocyte donation when comparing fresh versus frozen embryo replacements. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1411–8.e1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck N, Belva F, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G, Stoop D. Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1024–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck N, Santos-Ribeiro S, Stoop D, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:377–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesen TB, Mersereau JE, Kane JB, Steiner AZ. Optimal timing for elective egg freezing. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1551–6.e1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H, Lavery S. Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:239–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood G, Johnson MH. Having it all. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch Petersen K, Hvidman HW, Sylvest R, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, Macklon KT, et al. Family intentions and personal considerations on postponing childbearing in childless cohabiting and single women aged 35–43 seeking fertility assessment and counselling. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2563–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine ME, Ravitsky V. Sleepwalking Into infertility: the need for a public health approach towards advanced maternal age. Am J Bioeth. 2015;15:37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Vassena R, Prat A, Vernaeve V. Increasing fertility knowledge and awareness by tailored education: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32:113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Keurst A, Boivin J, Gameiro S. Women’s intentions to use fertility preservation to prevent gae-related fertility decline. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32:121–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn MC, Boehm JK, Patrizio P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:403–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtala A, Vilska S, Huttunen T, Kunttu K. Childbearing, the desire to have children, and awareness about the impact of age on female fertility among Finnish university students. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:108–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlström P, Tydén T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:558–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon M, Sylvest R, Hansson H, Nyboe Andersen A, Schmidt L. Sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes towards motherhood among single women compared with cohabiting women treated with donor semen – a Danish multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:473–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar