Status one year after fertility assessment and counselling in women of reproductive age—a qualitative study

References

• Statistics Denmark. Births. 2017. Available from: https://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/SelectVarVal/saveselections.asp. (accessed 27 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E. ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:848–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leridon H, Slama R. The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproduction technology. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1312–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, Leridon H, te Velde ER. Realizing a desired family size: when should couples start?. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2215–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting L, Tsibulsky I, Boivin J. Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: findings from the international fertility decision making study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:385–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1375–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen NO, Marcussen S, Backhausen MG, Juhl M, Schmidt L, Tyden T, et al. Fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood among Danish university college students. Reprod Health 2016;13:146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassard D, Lallemant C, Nyboe Andersen A, Macklon N, Schmidt L. A population-based survey on family intentions and fertility awareness in women and men in the United Kingdom and Denmark. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;27:244–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg K, Norman RJ, Robertson S, McLachlan R, Michelmore J, Johnson L. Development of a health promotion programme to improve awareness of factors that affect fertility, and evaluation of its reach in the first 5 years. Reprod BioMed Soc Online. 2017;4:33–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniluk JC, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:353–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Vassena R, Prat A, Vernaeve V. Increasing fertility knowledge and awareness by tailored education: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;32:113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda E, Nakamura F, Kobayashi Y, Boivin J, Sugimori H, Murata K, et al. Effects of knowledge, desires and anxiety among the reproductive-aged population: findings from a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2051–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson LEA, Lawson KL, Downe PJ, Pierson RA. Informed reproductive decision-making: the impact of providing fertility information on fertility knowledge and intentions to delay childbearing. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2014;36:400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wojcieszek AM, Thompson R. Conceiving of change: a brief intervention increases young adults’ knowledge of fertility and the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:523–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conceicao C, Pedro J, Martins MV. Effectiveness of a video intervention on fertility knowledge among university students: a randomised pre-test/post-test study. Euro J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22:107–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern J, Larsson M, Kristiansson P, Tyden T. Introducing reproductive life plan-based information in contraceptive counselling: an RCT. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2450–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern J, Bodin M, Grandahl M, Segeblad B, Axen L, Larsson M, et al. Midwives’ adoption of the reproductive life plan in contraceptive counselling: a mixed methods study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1146–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrand Ragnar M, Niemeyer Hultstrand J, Tyden T, Larsson M. Development of an evidence-based website on preconception health. Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123:116–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting L, Boivin J. Development and preliminary validation of the fertility status awareness tool: FertiSTAT. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1722–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvidman HW, Petersen KB, Larsen EC, Macklon KT, Pinborg A, Nyboe Andersen A. Individual fertility assessment and pro-fertility counselling; should this be offered to women and men of reproductive age?. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch Petersen K, Hvidman HW, Sylvest R, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, Macklon KT, et al. Family intentions and personal considerations on postponing childbearing in childless cohabiting and single women aged 35-43 seeking fertility assessment and counselling. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2563–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch Petersen K, Maltesen T, Forman JL, Sylvest R, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, et al. The fertility assessment and counselling clinic - does the concept work? A prospective 2-year follow-up study of 519 women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:313–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvest R, Petersen KB, Nyboe Andersen A, Pinborg A, Hvidman HW, Schmidt L. Attitudes towards family formation in cohabiting and single childless women in their mid- to late thirties. Hum Fertil. 2016;19:48–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremellen K, Savulescu J. Ovarian reserve screening: a scientific and ethical analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2606–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JMG, Jungner G. Principles and practice for screening for disease. 1968; 14–39. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37650 (accessed November 2, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG, Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 2000. p. 163–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32 item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Mills TA, Lavender T. Advanced maternal age: delayed childbearing is rarely a conscious choice. A qualitative study of women’s views and experiences. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:30–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstock I. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Behav. 1974;2:328–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar