Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology Volume 31, 2002 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
57
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Patients' views of priority setting for new medicines

Åsa Kettis Lindblad Dept of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2Dept of Pharmacy Health Care Administration, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, USA, 3Dept of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Abraham G. Hartzema Dept of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2Dept of Pharmacy Health Care Administration, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, USA, 3Dept of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Lisa Jansson Dept of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2Dept of Pharmacy Health Care Administration, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, USA, 3Dept of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
&
Nils Feltelius Dept of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2Dept of Pharmacy Health Care Administration, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, USA, 3Dept of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Pages 324-329 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Skapenko A, Kalden JR. Schulze-Koops. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the third millennium. Scand J Rheumatol 2001;30:249–54.
  • Emery P. Vision of the future in arthritis care. Scand J Rheumatol 1999;28 Suppl 109:3–11.
  • Maini RN, Taylor PC. Anti-cytokine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rev Med 2000;51:207–29.
  • McKee M, Figueras J. Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden? BMJ 1996;312:69 1–4.
  • Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission. Priorities in health care: Ethics, economy, implementation. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 1995. Report No.: 5.
  • Calltorp J. Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway. Health Policy 1999;50:1–22.
  • Holm S. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ 1998;317:1000–2.
  • Sabin JE. The second phase of priority setting. Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician's perspective on priority setting. BMJ 1998;317:100 2–4.
  • Blalock SJ, DeVellis BM. Stereotyping: the link between theory and practice. Patient Educ Couns 1986;8:17–25.
  • New B. The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group. BMJ 1996;312:1593–601.
  • Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24.
  • Marton F. Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the surrounding world. Instruct Sci 1981;10:177–200.
  • Fraser D. QSR NUD*ISTVivo Reference Guide. Melbourne: Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty. Ltd.; 1999.
  • Richards L. Using NVivo in qualitative research. Melbourne: Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty. Ltd.; 1999.
  • Twinn S. An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity and reliability of qualitative data in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 1997;26:418–23.
  • Moynihan R, Bero L, Ross-Degnan D, Henry D, Lee K, Watkins J, et al. Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. N Engl J Med 2000;342: 1645–50.
  • Furst DE, Keystone E, Maini RN, Smolen JS. Recapitulation of the round-table discussion-assessing the role of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;3 8 Suppl 2:50–3.
  • Läkemedelsinformation AB. Pharmaceutical Agents in Sweden 200 0 (FASS 2000). Kungsbacka: Läkemedelsinformation AB; 2000.
  • Bowling A. Health care rationing: the public's debate. BMJ 1996;312:67 0–4.
  • Dicker A, Armstrong D. Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice. BMJ 1995;311:1137–9.
  • Mossialos E, King D. Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey. Health Policy 1999;49:7 5–135.
  • Maynard A. Rationing health care: an exploration. Health Policy 1999;49:5–11.
  • McIver S. Information for public choice. Br Med Bull 1995;51:90 0–13.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.