References
- Hofstedt O, Di Giuseppe D, Alenius GM, Stattin N, Forsblad-D’Elia H, Ljung L. Comparison of agreement between internet-based registration of patient-reported outcomes and clinic-based paper forms within the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register. Scand J Rheumatol 2019;48:326–30.
- Madsen OR. Comparison of agreement between internet-based registration of patient-reported outcomes and clinical-based paper forms within the Swedish rheumatology quality register: comment on the article by Hofstedt et al. Scand J Rheumatol.
- Fleiss JL, ed. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
- Marcano Belisario JS, Jamsek J, Huckvale K, O’Donoghue J, Morrison CP, Car J. Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:MR000042.
- Studenic P, Stamm T, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Reliability of patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients: an observational prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;55:41–8.
- Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, Dammann KL, Dale Ø, Aanerud GJ, et al. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1480–4.
- Rohekar G, Pope J. Test-retest reliability of patient global assessment and physician global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2178–82.