Using a novel smartphone application for capturing of patient-reported outcome measures among patients with inflammatory arthritis:A randomized, crossover, agreement study

References

• Callahan LF. The history of patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 2016;42:205–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibfelt EH, Jensen DV, Hetland ML. The Danish nationwide clinical register for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: DANBIO. Clin Epidemiol 2016;8:737–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons SJ, Eremenco S, Lundy JJ, O’Donohoe P, O’Gorman H, Malizia W. Capturing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data electronically: the past, present, and promise of ePRO measurement in clinical trials. Patient 2015;8:301–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schefte DB, Hetland ML. An open-source, self-explanatory touch screen in routine care. Validity of filling in the Bath measures on ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index, function index, the Health Assessment Questionnaire and visual analogue scales in comparison with paper versions. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:99–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæhrens EE, Amris K, Bartels EM, Christensen R, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H, et al. Agreement between touch-screen and paper-based patient-reported outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized cross-over reproducibility study. Scand J Rheumatol 2015;44:503–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secher AE, Glintborg B, Gudbergsen H, Krogh NS, Sørensen IJ, Jensen DV, et al. Comparing patient-reported outcomes entered at home versus at hospital, and testing touch screens for initial recruitment to scientific trials in arthritis patients. Scand J Rheumatol 2019;48:178–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon WG, Michaud K. Using technology to support clinical care and research in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018;30:276–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maska L, Anderson J, Michaud K. Measures of functional status and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire II (HAQ-II), Improved Health Assessment Questionnaire (Improved HAQ), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL). Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:S4–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palominos PE, Gaujoux-Viala C, Fautrel B, Dougados M, Gossec L. Clinical outcomes in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:397–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zochling J. Measures of symptoms and disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Dougados Functional Index (DFI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondylarthropathies (HAQ-S). Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:S47–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan JR, Hewlett SE, Heiberg T, Hughes RA, Carr M, Hehir M, et al. Incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis – progress at OMERACT 7. J Rheumatol 2005;32:2250–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand V, Boers M, Idzerda L, Kirwan JR, Kvien TK, Tugwell PS, et al. It’s good to feel better but it’s better to feel good and even better to feel good as soon as possible for as long as possible. Response criteria and the importance of change at OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1720–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells G, Tugwell P, Kraaq G, Baker PRA, Groh J, Redelmeier DA. Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient’s perspective. J Rheumatol 1993;20:557–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavy S, Brophy S, Calin A. Establishment of the minimum clinically important difference for the bath ankylosing spondylitis indices: a prospective study. J Rheumatol 2005;32:80–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen R, Bliddal H, Henriksen M. Enhancing the reporting and transparency of rheumatology research: a guide to reporting guidelines. Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15:109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJW, Altman DG. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2012;308:2594–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value Heal 2009;12:419–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstedt O, Di Giuseppe D, Alenius GM, Stattin N, Forsblad-D’Elia H, Ljung L. Comparison of agreement between internet-based registration of patient-reported outcomes and clinic-based paper forms within the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register. Scand J Rheumatol 2019;48:326–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epis OM, Casu C, Belloli L, Schito E, Filippini D, Muscarà M, et al. Pixel or paper? Validation of a mobile technology for collecting patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. JMIR Res Protoc 2016;5:e219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus T, Castrejon I, Riad M, Obreja E, Lewis C, Krogh NS. Reliability, feasibility, and patient acceptance of an electronic version of a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire for routine rheumatology care: validation and patient preference study. JMIR Form Res 2020;4:e15815.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richter JG, Becker A, Koch T, Nixdorf M, Willers R, Monser R, et al. Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1739–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar