Validity of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in people with knee pain: a Rasch analysis

References

• Wang Y, Nguyen UDT, Lane NE, Lu N, Wei J, Lei G, et al. Knee osteoarthritis, potential mediators, and risk of all-cause mortality: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021;73:566–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstensson CA, Andersson M, Jönsson H, Saxne T, Petersson I. Natural course of knee osteoarthritis in middle-aged subjects with knee pain: 12-year follow-up using clinical and radiographic criteria. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1890–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creamer P, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Hochberg M. Factors associated with functional impairment in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 2000;39:490–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent E, Wilkes C, Koschwanez H, Weinman J, Norton S, Petrie KJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Psychol Health 2015;30:1361–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ. Illness representations and coping with health threats. Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg MF, Miaskowski C, Rustøen T, Rosseland LA, Paul SM, Lerdal A. Preoperative pain, symptoms, and psychological factors related to higher acute pain trajectories during hospitalization for total knee arthroplasty. PloS One 2016;11:e0161681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch B, O’connor D, Ions P, Scott A, Gregg P. Effects of psychological distress and perceptions of illness on recovery from total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2014;96:210–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frostholm L, Fink P, Christensen KS, Toft T, Oernboel E, Olesen F, et al. The patients’ illness perceptions and the use of primary health care. Psychosom Med 2005;67:997–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel RP, Taylor SD. Factors affecting medication adherence in hypertensive patients. Ann Pharmacother 2002;36:40–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemonsma PC, Stuive I, Roorda LD, Vollebregt JA, Walker MF, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Cognitive treatment of illness perceptions in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2013;93:435–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent E, Ellis CJ, Thomas J, Gamble G, Petrie KJ. Further development of an illness perception intervention for myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res 2009;67:17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-Morris R, Horne R. The Illness Perception Questionnaire: a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness. Psychol Health 1996;11:431–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie K, Horne R, Cameron L, Buick D. The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 2002;17:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley L, Smith AB, Keding A, Jones H, Velikova G, Wright P. Psychometric evaluation of the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in cancer patients: confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. J Psychosom Res 2013;75:556–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees G, Lamoureux EL, Xie J, Sturrock BA, Fenwick EK. Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the validity of the diabetes-specific version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire–Revised. J Health Psychol 2015;20:1340–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006;60:631–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper H, van Leeuwen CM, Stolwijk-Swüste JM, Post MW. Reliability and validity of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) in individuals with a recently acquired spinal cord injury. Clin Rehabil 2022;36:550–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løchting I, Garratt A, Storheim K, Werner E, Grotle M. Evaluation of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in sub-acute and chronic low back pain patients: data quality, reliability and validity. J Pain Relief 2013;2:2167.
   Google Scholar
• Boone WJ. Rasch analysis for instrument development: why, when, and how? CBE Life Sci Educ 2016;15:rm4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginnerup-Nielsen EM, Henriksen M, Christensen R, Heitmann BL, Altman R, March L, et al. Prevalence of self-reported knee symptoms and management strategies among elderly individuals from Frederiksberg municipality: protocol for a prospective and pragmatic Danish cohort study. BMJ open 2019;9:e028087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wright B, Linacre J. Differences between scores and measures. Rasch Meas Trans 1989;1:63–5.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Winsteps Rasch measurement computer program. Chicago, IL: Winsteps Com, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wæhrens EE, Kottorp A, Nielsen KT. Measuring self-reported ability to perform activities of daily living: a Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021;19:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amris K, Omerovic E, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H, Waehrens E. The validity of self-rating depression scales in patients with chronic widespread pain: a Rasch analysis of the Major Depression Inventory. Scand J Rheumatol 2016;45:236–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifbjerg-Madsen S, Wæhrens EE, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Amris K. Psychometric properties of the painDETECT questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: rasch analysis and test-retest reliability. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017;15:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. A user’s guide to Winsteps®Ministep Rasch-model computer programs: Winsteps. 2023 [ cited 2023 Aug 14]. 5.6.0:Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/copyright.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre J. A user’s guide to Winsteps-Ministep: Rasch-model computer programs. Program Manual 2009;3(68).
   Google Scholar
• Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, Velikova G, Sharpe M. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draba R. The identification and interpretation of item bias (Research Memorandum No. 25). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel N. Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. J Am Stat Assoc 1963;58:690–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottorp A, Malinowsky C, Larsson-Lund M, Nygård L. Gender and diagnostic impact on everyday technology use: a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ). Disabil Rehabil 2019;41:2688–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher W. Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Meas Trans 1992;6:238.
   Google Scholar
• Wright B. Reliability and separation. Rasch Meas Trans 1996;9:472.
   Google Scholar
• Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982;47:149–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978;43:561–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre J. Category disordering vs. step (threshold) disordering. Rasch Meas Trans 1999;13:675.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Investigating rating scale category utility. J Outcome Meas 1999;3:103–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM, Wright BD. Construction of measures from many-facet data. J Appl Meas 2002;3:486–512.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badia X, Prieto L, Linacre JM. Differential item and test functioning (DIF & DTF). Rasch Meas Trans 2002;16:889.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EV Jr. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 2002;3:205–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. Principal components/contrast plots of item loadings. 2012 [ cited 2022 Aug 08]. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/table23_1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Huergo V, Viladrich C, Pujol-Ribera E, Cabezas-Peña C, Núñez M, Roura-Olmeda P, et al. Perception in chronic illnesses: linguistic validation of the revised illness perception questionnaire and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire for a Spanish population. Aten Primaria 2012;44:280–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhn P, Amris K, Bliddal H, Wæhrens E. The validity of the Danish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire – Revised applied in a clinical setting: a Rasch analysis. Scand J Rheumatol 2023;52:385–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;41:1073–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Liu X, Herr K. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults. Pain Med 2007;8:223–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DD, Patel R, Robinson ME, Staud R. Characteristics of electronic visual analogue and numerical scales for ratings of experimental pain in healthy subjects and fibromyalgia patients. Pain 2008;140:158–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Fielding R, Soong I, Chan KK, Lee C, Ng A, et al. Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in breast cancer survivors. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Mes Trans 1994;7:328.
   Google Scholar