Big game hunting in New Zealand: per capita effort, harvest and expenditure in 2011–2012

References

• Alessi MG, Miller CA 2012. Comparing a convenience sample against a random sample of duck hunters. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17: 155–158. 10.1080/10871209.2012.618941
   Google Scholar
• Connelly NA, Brown TL 1995. Use of angler diaries to examine biases associated with 12-month recall on mail questionnaires. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124: 413–422. 10.1577/1548-8659(1995)124%3C0413:UOADTE%3E2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly NA, Brown TL, Kniuth, BA 2000. Assessing the relative importance of recall bias and nonresponse bias and adjusting for those biases in statewide angler surveys. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5: 19–29. 10.1080/10871200009359192
   Google Scholar
• Cornicelli L, Grund MD 2011. Assessing deer hunter attitudes toward regulatory change using self-selected respondents. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16: 174–182. 10.1080/10871209.2011.559529
   Google Scholar
• Davys TR, Forsyth DM, Hickling GJ 1999. Recreational Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) hunters in Canterbury, New Zealand: a profile and management implications. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 26: 1–9. 10.1080/03014223.1999.9518171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda MD, Nobile JL 2010. The fallacy of online surveys: no data are better than bad data. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15: 55–64. 10.1080/10871200903244250
   Google Scholar
• Figgins G, Holland P 2012. Red deer in New Zealand: game animal, economic resource or environmental pest? New Zealand Geographer 68: 36–48. 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2012.01219.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher WL, Grambsch AE, Eisenhower DL, Morganstein DR 1991. Length of recall period and accuracy of estimates from the national survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12: 367–374.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth DM 1997. Ecology and management of Himalayan tahr and sympatric chamois in the Southern Alps, New Zealand. PhD thesis. Lincoln, New Zealand, Lincoln University. 140 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser KW 2000. Status and conservation role of recreational hunting on conservation land. Science for Conservation Report 140. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand, 46 p.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe A, Mowen A, Covelli E, Trauntvein N 2011. Recreation participation and conservation attitudes: differences between mail and online respondents in a mixed-mode survey. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16: 183–199. 10.1080/10871209.2011.571750
   Google Scholar
• Hartill BW, Cryer M, Lyle JM et al. 2012. Scale- and context-dependent selection of recreational harvest estimation methods: the Australasian experience. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32: 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr GN,Woods A 2010. New Zealand game hunting values: a benefit transfer study. Land, Environment and People Report No. 23. Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. 39 p.
   Google Scholar
• King NJ, Lake, RJ, Kerr GN 2013. Wild foods. In: Dymond JR ed. Ecosystem services in New Zealand–conditions and trends. Lincoln, New Zealand, Manaaki Whenua Press. Pp. 287–289.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent G 1992a. The conservation role of commercial deer hunting. Contract Report FEW 92/3. Christchurch, New Zealand, Forest Research Institute. 49 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent G 1992b. Big-game, small-game, and gamebird hunting in New Zealand: hunting effort, harvest, and expenditure in 1988. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 19: 75–90. 10.1080/03014223.1992.10422312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn MF, Matlock GC 2010. Recall bias in a sportfishing mail survey. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30: 665–670. 10.1577/M09-196.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton NR, Miller HM, Dietsch AM 2011. Appropriate uses and considerations for online surveying in human dimensions research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16: 154–163. 10.1080/10871209.2011.572142
   Google Scholar
• Southwick Associates 2012. Hunting in America: an economic force for conservation. Produced for the National Shooting Sports Foundation in partnership with the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Fernandina Beach, Florida, Southwick Associates. 16 p.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics NZ 2012. Household economic survey (income): year ended June 2012. http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/Households/HouseholdEconomicSurvey_HOTPYeJun12.aspx (accessed 26 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sudman S, Bradburn NM 1973. Effects of time and memory factors on response in surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68: 805–815. 10.1080/01621459.1973.10481428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant MA, Manfredo MJ, Bayley PB, Hess R 1993. Effects of recall bias and nonresponse bias on self-report estimates of angling participation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13: 217–222. 10.1577/1548-8675(1993)013%3C0217:EORBAN%3E2.3.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Thomson CJ 1991. Effects of the avidity bias on survey estimates of fishing effort and economic value. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12: 356–366.
   Google Scholar
• USFWS 2012. 2011 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation: national overview. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 24 p. http://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/HuntingFishingNatSurvey_2012-508(2).pdf (accessed 6 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Vaske JJ, Jacobs MH, Sijtsma MTJ, Beaman J 2011. Can weighting compensate for sampling issues in internet surveys? Human Dimensions of Wildlife 16: 200–215. 10.1080/10871209.2011.571230
   Google Scholar
• Westat Inc 1989. Investigation of possible recall/reference period bias in national surveys of fishing, hunting and wildlife-associated recreation. Rockville, MD, US Fish and Wildlife Service. 154 p.
   Google Scholar
• Woods A, Kerr GN 2010. Recreational game hunting: motivations, satisfactions and participation. Land, Environment and People Report No. 18. Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. 48 p.
   Google Scholar