528
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Developing indices of relative abundance for monitoring cave and ground wētā (Orthoptera) in southern beech forest, New Zealand

, &
Pages 149-162 | Received 30 Jul 2015, Accepted 29 Oct 2015, Published online: 08 Jun 2016

References

  • Bellingham PJ, Lee WG. 2006. Distinguishing natural processes from impacts of invasive mammalian herbivores. In: Allen RB, Lee WG, editors. Biological invasions in New Zealand. Ecological Studies 186. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Heidelberg; p. 323–338.
  • Bleakley C, Stringer I, Robertson A, Hedderley D. 2006. Design and use of artificial refuges for monitoring adult tree weta, Hemideina crassidens and H. thoracica. DOC Research & Development Series No. 233. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
  • Brown KP, Moller H, Innes J, Alterio N. 1996. Calibration of tunnel tracking rates to estimate relative abundance of ship rats (Rattus rattus) and mice (Mus musculus) in a New Zealand forest. New Zeal J Ecol. 20:271–275.
  • Caro TM, O'Doherty G. 1999. On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv Biol. 13:805–814. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98338.x.
  • Caughley GC. 1977. Analysis of vertebrate populations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Chappell EM, Webb DS, Tonkin JD. 2014. Notes on sexual size dimorphism, sex ratio and movements of adult ground weta Hemiandrus maculifrons (Walker)(Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). New Zeal Entomol. 37:83–92. doi: 10.1080/00779962.2013.856377
  • Cook LD, Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M, Johns PM. 2010. Status of the New Zealand cave weta (Rhaphidophoridae) genera Pachyrhamma, Gymnoplectron and Turbottoplectron. Invertebr Syst. 24:131–138. doi: 10.1071/IS09047
  • Daniel ML. 1973. Seasonal diet of the ship rat (Rattus rattus rattus) in lowland forest in New Zealand. Proc New Zeal Ecol Soc. 20:21–30.
  • Fitness JL, Morgan-Richards M, Ball OP, Godfrey AJR, Trewick SA. 2015. Improved resolution of cave weta diversity (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae): ecological implications for Te Paki, Far North, New Zealand. New Zeal J Zool. 42:1–16. doi:10.1080/03014223.2014.983939.
  • Fowler J, Cohen L, Jarvis P. 1998. Practical field statistics for field biology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gibbs GW. 1998. Why are some weta (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae) vulnerable yet others are common? J Insect Conserv. 2:161–166. doi:10.1023/A:1009660200402.
  • Gillies C, Williams D. 2002. Using tracking tunnels to monitor rodents and other small mammals. Department of Conservation unpublished report HAMRO-60778. Hamilton: DOC Northern Regional Office.
  • Green CJ. 2002. Recovery of invertebrate populations on Tiritiri Matangi Island, New Zealand following eradication of Pacific rats (Rattus exculans) [abstract]. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN, editors. Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. Gland, Switzerland; Cambridge, UK: IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group; p. 407.
  • Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, Bryant D, Woodward R. 1995. Environmental indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
  • Huggins RM. 1991. Some practical aspects of conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics. 47:725–732. doi:10.2307/2532158.
  • Hoare JM, Adams LK, Bull LS, Towns DR. 2007. Attempting to manage complex predator-prey interactions fails to avert imminent extinction of a threatened New Zealand skink population. J Wildlife Manage. 71:1576–1584. doi:10.2193/2006-488.
  • Hoare JM, O'Donnell CFJ, Westbrooke I, Hodapp D, Lettink M. 2009. Optimising the sampling of skinks using artificial retreats based on weather conditions and time of day. Appl Herpetol. 6:379–390. doi:10.1163/157075309X12531848432985.
  • Hoare JM, O'Donnell CFJ, Wright EF. 2010. Selection of indicator species for state of the environment reporting: a case study from New Zealand. Pac Conservat Biol. 16:76–82. doi: 10.1071/PC100076
  • Innes J, Kelly D, Overton JM, Gillies C. 2010. Predation and other factors currently limiting New Zealand forest birds. New Zeal J Ecol. 34:86–114.
  • Jamieson IG, Forbes MR, McKnight EB. 2000. Mark-recapture study of mountain stone weta Hemideina maori (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) on rock tor ‘islands’. New Zeal J Ecol. 24:209–214.
  • Johns P. 1997. The Gondwanaland weta: family Anostostomatidae (formerly in Stenopalmatidae, Henicidae or Mimnermidae): nomenclatural problems, world checklist, new genera and species. J Orthoptera Res. 6:125–138. doi:10.2307/3503546.
  • Lee W, McGlone M, Wright E. 2005. Biodiversity inventory and monitoring: a review of national and international systems and a proposed framework for future biodiversity monitoring by the Department of Conservation. Wellington: Landcare Research.
  • Luff ML. 1975. Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps. Oecologia. 19:345–357. doi:10.1007/BF00348110.
  • McIntyre ME. 2001. The ecology of some large weta species in New Zealand. In: Field LH, editor. The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; p. 231–242.
  • Monks JM, O'Donnell CFJ, Wright EF. 2013. Selection of potential indicator species for measuring and reporting on trends in widespread native taxa in New Zealand. DOC Research and Development Series 338. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
  • Monteith GB, Field LH. 2001. Australian king crickets: distribution, habitats and biology (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). In: Field LH, editor. The biology of wetas, king crickets and their allies. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; p. 79–94.
  • O'Donnell CFJ. 2000. Influence of season, habitat, temperature, and invertebrate availability on nocturnal activity by the New Zealand long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus). New Zeal J Zool. 27:207–221. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2000.9518228
  • O'Donnell CFJ, Hoare JM. 2012. Quantifying the benefits of long-term integrated pest control for forest bird populations in a New Zealand temperate rainforest. New Zeal J Ecol. 36:131–140.
  • O'Donnell CFJ, Phillipson SM. 1996. Predicting the occurrence of mohua predation from the seedfall, mouse and predator fluctuations in beech forests. New Zeal J Zool. 23:287–293. doi:10.1080/03014223.1996.9518087.
  • Pledger S. 2000. Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed population capture-recapture models for mixtures. Biometrics. 54:888–898. doi:10.2307/2533843.
  • Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Simons TR, Farnsworth GL, Bailey LL, Sauer JR. 2002. Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Envirometrics. 13:105–119. doi:10.1002/env.514.
  • Pryde MA, O'Donnell CFJ, Barker RJ. 2005. Factors influencing survival and long-term population viability of New Zealand long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus): implications for conservation. Biol Conserv. 126:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.006
  • Ramsay GW. 1978. A review of the effect of rodents on the New Zealand invertebrate fauna. In: Dingwall PR, Atkinson IA, Hay C, editors. The ecology and control of rodents in New Zealand nature reserves. Department of Lands and Survey Information Series No. 4. Wellington: Department of Lands and Survey; p. 89–97.
  • R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In: vol 2013. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rufaut CG, Gibbs GW. 2003. Response of a tree weta population (Hemideina crassidens) after eradication of the Polynesian rat from a New Zealand island. Restor Ecol. 11:13–19. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00058.x
  • Ruscoe WA, Sweetapple PJ, Perry M, Duncan RP. 2013. Effects of spatially extensive control of invasive rats on abundance of native invertebrates in mainland New Zealand forests. Conserv Biol. 27:74–82. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01932.x.
  • Sinclair L, McCartney J, Godfrey J, Pledger S, Wakelin M, Sherley G. 2005. How did invertebrates respond to eradication of rats from Kapiti Island, New Zealand?. New Zeal J Zool. 32:293–315. doi:10.1080/03014223.2005.9518421.
  • Smith DH, Jamieson IG, Peach RM. 2005. Importance of ground weta (Hemiandras spp.) in stoat (Mustela erminea) diet in small montane valleys and alpine grasslands. New Zeal J Ecol. 29:207–214.
  • Tocher MD. 2006. Survival of grand and Otago skinks following predator control. J Wildlife Manage. 70:31–42. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[31:SOGAOS]2.0.CO;2.
  • Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M. 2000. Artificial weta roosts: a technique for ecological study and population monitoring of tree weta (Hemideina) and other invertebrates. New Zeal J Ecol. 24:201–208.
  • UNEP-WCMC. 2009. International expert workshop on the 2010 biodiversity indicators and post-2010 indicator development. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
  • Wardle DA, Barker GM, Yeates GW et al. 2001. Introduced browsing mammals in natural New Zealand forests: aboveground and belowground consequences. Ecol Monogr. 71:587–614. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0587:IBMINZ]2.0.CO;2.
  • Watts CH, Armstrong DP, Innes J, Thornburrow D. 2011. Dramatic increase in weta (Orthoptera) following mammal eradication on Maungatautari—evidence from pitfalls and tracking tunnels. New Zeal J Ecol. 35:261–272.
  • Watts CH, Stringer I, Thornburrow D, MacKenzie D. 2010. Are footprint tracking tunnels suitable for monitoring giant weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)? Abundance, distribution and movement in relation to tracking rates. J Insect Conserv. 15:433–443. doi:10.1007/s10841-010-9321-3.
  • Watts CH, Thornburrow D, Cave V, Innes J. 2014. Beetle community changes following pest mammal control at two biodiversity sanctuaries in Wellington, New Zealand. J Roy Soc New Zeal. 44:61–87. doi:10.1080/03036758.2013.875478.
  • Watts CH, Thornburrow D, Green CJ, Agnew WR. 2008. Tracking tunnels: a novel method of detecting a threatened New Zealand giant weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). New Zeal J Ecol. 32:92–97.
  • White GC, Burnham KP. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study. 46:S120–S139. doi:10.1080/00063659909477239.
  • Worthy TH, Holdaway RN. 2002. The lost world of the moa: prehistoric life of New Zealand. Bloomington/Christchurch: Indiana University Press/Canterbury University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.