Analysis of footprints provides additional insights during monitoring of Duvaucel’s geckos (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii)

References

• Angeli T, de Oliveira ML, Duarte JMB. 2014. Differentiation of deer species of the genus Mazama by track morphometry. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 49:199–203. doi: 10.1080/01650521.2014.958898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baling M, van Winkel D, Rixon M, Ruffell J, Ji W, Ussher G. 2013. A review of reptile research and conservation management on Tiritiri Matangi Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 37:272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell TP, Herbert SM. 2017. Establishment of a self-sustaining population of a long-lived, slow-breeding gecko species (Diplodactylidae: Hoplodactylus duvaucelii) evident 15 years after translocation. Journal of Herpetology. 51:37–46. doi: 10.1670/15-106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell GL, Potter MA, McLennan JA. 2002. Rodent density indices from tracking tunnels, snap-traps and Fenn traps: do they tell the same story? New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 26:43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein FL. 1982. Foundations of morphometrics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 13:451–470. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002315
   Google Scholar
• Brown KP, Moller H, Innes J, Alterio N. 1996. Calibration of tunnel tracking rates to estimate relative abundance of ships rats (Rattus rattus) and mice (Mus musculus) in a New Zealand forest. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 20:271–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter JK, Monks JM, O’Donnell CFJ. 2016. Developing indices of relative abundance for monitoring cave and ground wētā (Orthoptera) in southern beech forest, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 43:149–162. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2015.1117500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison SA, Swanson BJ. 2016. Individual identification of raccoons (Procyon lotor) using track plate foot printing. The American Midland Naturalist. 176:306–312. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031-176.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill B, Whitaker T. 1996. New Zealand frogs and reptiles. Auckland: Bateman Fieldguides.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington LA, Harrington AL, Macdonald DW. 2008. Distinguishing tracks of mink Mustela vision and polecat M. putorius. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 54:367–371. doi: 10.1007/s10344-007-0145-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog CJ, Kays RW, Ray JC, Gompper ME, Zielinski WJ, Higgins R, Tymeson M. 2007. Using patterns in track-plate footprints to identify individual fishers. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71:955–963. doi: 10.2193/2006-408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchmough R, Anderson P, Barr B, Monks J, Lettink M, Reardon J, Tocher M, Whitaker T. 2013. Conservation status of New Zealand reptiles, 2012. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvie S, Monks JM. 2014. Step on it: can footprints from tracking tunnels be used to identify lizard species? New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 41:210–217. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2014.911753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell T. 2008. A photographic guide to reptiles and amphibians of New Zealand. Auckland: New Holland Publishers (NZ) Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jones C, Moller H, Hamilton W. 2004. A review of potential techniques for identifying individual stoats (Mustela erminea) visiting control or monitoring stations. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 31:193–203. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2004.9518372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CM, Edgar RL. 1977. Techniques for trapping and tracking stoats (Mustela erminea); a review, and a new system. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 4:193–212. doi: 10.1080/03014223.1977.9517953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettink M, Monks JM. 2016. Survey and monitoring methods for New Zealand lizards. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 46:16–28. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2015.1108343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KA, Bell TP, Germano JM. 2014. Understanding publication bias in reintroduction biology by assessing translocations of New Zealand’s herpetofauna. Conservation Biology. 28:1045–1056. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills CA, Godley BJ, Hodgson DJ, Cameron EZ. 2016. Take only photographs, leave only footprints: novel applications of non-invasive survey methods for rapid detection of small, arboreal animals. PLoS ONE. 11:e0146142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molles CM Jr. 2010. Ecology: concepts and applications, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DKJ, Waas JR, Innes J. 2009. An inventory of mammalian pests in a New Zealand city. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 36:23–33. doi: 10.1080/03014220909510136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Richards M, Hinlo AR, Smuts-Kennedy C, Innes J, Ji W, Barry M, Brunton D, Hitchmough RA. 2016. Identification of a rare Gecko from North Island New Zealand, and genetic assessment of its probable origin: a novel mainland conservation priority? Journal of Herpetology. 50:77–86. doi: 10.1670/13-128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma ART, Gurgel-Goncalvais R. 2007. Morphometric identification of small mammal footprints from ink tracking tunnels in the Brazilian Cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 24:333–343. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81752007000200011
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Romijn RL, Hartley S. 2016. Trends in lizard translocations in New Zealand between 1988 and 2013. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 43:191–210. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2016.1146311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel JC, Hasler N, Klette R, Rosenhahn B. 2009. Automatic track recognition of footprints for identifying cryptic species. Ecology. 90:2007–2013. doi: 10.1890/08-1069.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods. 9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Jhala Y, Sawarkar VB. 2005. Identification of individual tigers (Panthera tigris) from their pugmarks. Journal of Zoology. 267:9–18. doi: 10.1017/S0952836905007119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyam SM. 2006. Reptile monitoring: development of an effective, passive monitoring technique [M.Sc. thesis], Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Stolen ED, Oddy DM, Breininger DR, Gann SL, Legare SA, Weiss SK, Holloway-Adkins KG, Schaub R, Legare ML. 2014. Preventing tracking-tube false detections in occupancy modeling of southeastern beach mouse. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 5:270–281. doi: 10.3996/032014-JFWM-025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towns DR, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CPH, Lyver POB. 2012. A research strategy for biodiversity conservation on New Zealand’s offshore islands. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 36:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Winkel D. 2008. Efficiency of techniques for post-translocation monitoring of the Duvaucel’s gecko (Hoplodactylus duvaucelii) and evidence of avian predation on lizards [M.Sc. thesis], Auckland, New Zealand: Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Western D, Moss C, Georgiadis N. 1983. Age estimation and population age structure of elephants from footprint dimensions. Journal of Wildlife Management. 47:1192–1197. doi: 10.2307/3808191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarnell RW, Pacheco M, Williams B, Neumann JL, Rymer DJ, Baker PJ. 2014. Using occupancy analysis to validate the use of footprint tunnels as a method for monitoring the hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus. Mammal Review. 44:234–238. doi: 10.1111/mam.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar