Current and predicted future distributions of wallabies in mainland New Zealand

References

• Bayne P, Harden R, Davies I. 2004. Feral goats (Capra hircus L.) in the Macleay River gorge system, north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. I. Impacts on soil erosion. Wildlife Research. 31:519–525. doi: 10.1071/WR03039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benes M. 2001. The effects of dama wallaby (Macropus eugenii) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) on the native vegetation of the Okataina Scenic Reserve [Unpublished MSc thesis]. Hamilton (NZ): University of Waikato.
   Google Scholar
• Bond ARF, Jones DN. 2014. Roads and macropods: interactions and implications. Australian Mammalogy. 36:1–14. doi: 10.1071/AM13005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughley C, Shepherd N, Short J. 1987. Kangaroos: their ecology and management in the sheep rangelands of Australia. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caughley G. 1963. Dispersal rates of several ungulates introduced into New Zealand. Nature. 200:280–281. doi: 10.1038/200280b0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choquenot D, Warburton B. 2006. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of wallaby control in New Zealand. Wildlife Research. 33:77–83. doi: 10.1071/WR05008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clout M, Ericksen K. 2000. Anatomy of a disastrous success: the brushtail possum as an invasive species. In: Montague TL, editor. The brushtail possum: biology, impact and management of an introduced marsupial. Lincoln (NZ): Manaaki Whenua Press; p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Courchamp F, Chapuis J-L, Pascal M. 2003. Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biological Reviews. 78:347–383. doi: 10.1017/S1464793102006061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan PE. 2005. Brushtail possum. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; p. 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Di Stefano J. 2004. The importance of ecological research for ecosystem management: the case of browsing by swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor) in commercially harvested native forests. Ecological Management and Restoration. 5:61–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2004.00170.x
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge MDB, Coulson GM. 2015. Family Macropodidae (kangaroos and wallabies). In: Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA, editors. Handbook of the mammals of the world. Vol. 5. Monotremes and marsupials. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions; p. 630–735.
   Google Scholar
• Elith J, Graham C, Anderson R, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans R, Huettmann F, Leathwick J, Lehmann A, et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 29:129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S. 2010. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 1:330–342. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2015. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2. California: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding AH, Bell JF. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation. 24:38–49. doi: 10.1017/S0376892997000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth DM, Tustin KG. 2005. Himalayan tahr. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; p. 361–373.
   Google Scholar
• Gangoso L, Donázar JA, Scholz S, Palacios CJ, Hiraldo F. 2006. Contradiction in conservation of island ecosystems: plants, introduced herbivores and avian scavengers in the Canary Islands. Biodiversity and Conservation. 15:2231–2248. doi: 10.1007/s10531-004-7181-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood RM, Atkinson IAE. 1977. Evolution of divaricating plants in New Zealand in relation to moa browsing. Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society. 24:21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DH. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology. 61:65–71. doi: 10.2307/1937156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanth KK, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Karanth KU, Christensen NL. 2009. Patterns and determinants of mammal species occurrence in India. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46:1189–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King CM. 2005. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowlton JE, Panapa N. 1982. Dama wallaby survey, Okataina Scenic Reserve. Rotorua: New Zealand Forest Service. (Unpublished report).
   Google Scholar
• Latham ADM, Warburton B, Byrom AE, Pech RP. 2017. The ecology and management of mammal invasions in forests. Biological Invasions. 19:3121–3139. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1421-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leader-Williams N. 1988. Reindeer on South Georgia. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwick J, Wilson G, Rutledge D, Wardle P, Morgan F, Johnston K, McLeod M, Kirkpatrick R. 2003. Land environments of New Zealand. Auckland: David Bateman Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström T, Brown GP, Sisson SA, Phillips BL, Shine R. 2013. Rapid shifts in dispersal behavior on an expanding range edge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110:13452–13456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303157110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. 2005. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 28:385–393. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod S. 1986. The feeding and behavioural interactions of Bennett’s wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus) with domestic sheep (Ovis aries) in South Canterbury, New Zealand [Unpublished MSc thesis]. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray SC. 2002. Eradication of introduced Australian marsupials (brushtail possum and brushtailed rock wallaby) from Rangitoto and Motutapu Islands, New Zealand. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN, editors. Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. Gland and Cambridge (UK): International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Species Survival Commission, Invasive Species Specialist Group, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources; p. 226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Norbury G, Reddiex B. 2005. European rabbit. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; p. 131–150.
   Google Scholar
• NPCA. 2015. Pest wallabies: control and monitoring of pest dama and Bennett’s wallabies. Wellington: National Pest Control Agencies. http://www.npca.org.nz/images/stories/NPCA/PDF/a9_pest%20wallabies_2015-nov_lr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nugent G, Fraser KW. 2005. Red deer. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; p. 401–420.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes JP. 2005. Feral goat. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; p. 374–392.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. 190:231–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimental D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience. 50:53–65. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro L, Ross J, Adams P, Keyzer R, Hix S, MacMorran D, Cunningham C, Eason C. 2011. Effectiveness of cyanide pellets for control of dama wallabies (Macropus eugenii). New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 35:287–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieren SE, Bakker JP. 2008. The impact of browsing and grazing herbivores on biodiversity. In: Gordon IJ, Prins HHT, editors. The ecology of browsing and grazing. Berlin: Springer; p. 263–292.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez DP. 2002. Multiple effects of introduced mammalian herbivores in a temperate forest. Biological Invasions. 4:175–191. doi: 10.1023/A:1020522923905
   Google Scholar
• Wallace SW, Wallace G. 1995. The impact of dama wallaby (Macropus eugenii) on forest understoreys in Lake Okataina Scenic Reserve. Rotorua: Department of Conservation. (Unpublished Report).
   Google Scholar
• Warburton B. 1986. Wallabies in New Zealand: history, current status, research, and management needs. Forest Research Institute Bulletin. 114:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton B. 2005a. Dama wallaby. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; p. 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton B. 2005b. Bennett’s wallaby. In: King CM, editor. The handbook of New Zealand mammals. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; p. 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton B, Burrows L, Webb T. 1995. Effects of Bennett’s wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus) on vegetation and soil values in South Canterbury. Lincoln: Landcare Research. (Report no. LC9596/53).
   Google Scholar
• Warburton B, Latham MC, Glentworth B. 2014. Bennett’s wallabies: do they provide any lessons for eradicating invasives? Kararehe Kino. 23:10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Williams K, Parer I, Coman B, Burley J, Braysher M. 1995. Managing vertebrate pests: rabbits. Canberra: Bureau of Resource Sciences/CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Australian Government Publishing Service. p. 284.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson GM. 1986. The ecology of the dama wallaby (Macropus eugenii, Desmarest) in forests at Rotorua, with special reference to diet [Unpublished MSc thesis]. Palmerston North: Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Wright S. 2017. The impact of dama wallaby (Macropus eugenii) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) on forest understorey in the Lake Okataina Scenic Reserve—2017 update. Wellington: Department of Conservation. (Unpublished Report: DOC-3223478).
   Google Scholar
• Yost AC, Peterson SL, Gregg M, Miller R. 2008. Predictive modelling and mapping of sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nesting habitat using maximum entropy and a long-term dataset from southern Oregon. Ecological Informatics. 3:375–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar