Assessing EDR and a novel deer repellent for reducing by-kill of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), during aerial 1080 operations

References

• Becciolini V, Lanini F, Ponzetta MP. 2019. Impact of capture and chemical immobilization on the spatial behaviour of red deer Cervus elaphus hinds. Wildlife Biology. 1:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Berger-Tal O, Saltz D. 2014. Using the movement patterns of reintroduced animals to improve reintroduction success. Current Zoology. 60(4):515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Forrester TD, Brazeal JL, Sacks BN, Casady DS, Wittmer HU. 2017. Implications of fidelity and philopatry for the population structure of female black-tailed deer. Behavioral Ecology. 28(4):983–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen LH, Morgan DR, Eason CT. 1995. Persistence of sodium monofluoroacetate (1080) in baits under simulated rainfall. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 38(4):529–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DelGiudice GD, Fieberg JR, Sampson BA, Hayward Matt. 2013. A long-term assessment of the variability in winter use of dense conifer cover by female white-tailed deer. Plos One. 8(6):e65368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilks P, Sjoberg T, Murphy EC. 2020. Effectiveness of aerial 1080 for control of mammal pests in the Blue Mountains, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 44(2):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donne TE. 1924. The game animals of New Zealand: an account of their introduction, acclimatization and development. London: J. Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth DM, Thomson C, Hartley LJ, MacKenzie DI, Price R, Wright EF, Mortimer JAJ, Nugent G, Wilson L, Livingstone P. 2011. Long-term changes in the relative abundances of introduced deer in New Zealand estimated from faecal pellet frequencies. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 38(3):237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frampton CM, Warburton B, Henderson R, Morgan DR. 1999. Optimising bait size and 1080 concentration (sodium monofluoroacetate) for the control of brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula). Wildlife Research. 26(1):53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser A. 2006. Public attitudes to pest control. Department of Conservation. https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/drds227.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser KW, Cone JM, Whitford EJ. 2000. A revision of the established ranges and new populations of 11 introduced ungulate species in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 30(4):419–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser KW, Sweetapple P. 2000. A comparison of the effectiveness of two toxic loadings (0.085% and 0.15%) for control of deer during aerial 1080 poisoning using carrot baits. Unpublished: Landcare Research Contract Report LC9900.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey SMW. 2014. Winter Home Range and Habitat Use by Wapiti in Fiordland National Park [Bachelor of agricultural science honours dissertation]. https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10182/6463/Harvey_BAgrSc%28Hons%29.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y: Lincoln University.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy EM, Kemp JR, Mosen CC, Perry GLW, Dennis TE. 2015. GPS telemetry for parrots: A case study with the Kea (Nestor notabilis). The Auk. 132(2):389–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball BA, Taylor J, Perry KR, Capelli C. 2009. Deer responses to repellent stimuli. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 35:1461–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll JC. 1996. Aging and Judjing Trophy Whitetails. Stephen F. Austin State University Center for Applied Studies in Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Latham ADM, Herries D, Latham MC. 2015. Seasonal patterns of resource selection by introduced sika deer (Cervus nippon) in Kaweka forest Park recreational hunting area, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 39(2):291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malham J, Elliott GP, Walker S. 2019. No evidence of negative effects of aerial 1080 operations on red deer (Cervus elaphus) encounters and sightings in South westland forests. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 43(2):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morellet N, Verheyden H, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, Lourtet B, Hewison MAJ. 2009. The effect of capture on ranging behaviour and activity of the European roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Wildlife Biology. 15(3):278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morriss GA, Nugent G. 2005. Development and Testing of a Deer-repellent Cereal Bait for Possum Control Part III: Cereal Bait Field Trial. Landcare Research LC0304/021.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss GA, Nugent G. 2008. Monitoring the impact of aerially sown 1080 EDR cereal bait on fallow deer in the Blue Mountains. Landcare Research Contract Report LC0809/032.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss GA, Nugent G. 2018. Impact of aerial 1080 baiting with and without Epro deer repellent on a red deer and tahr population in Otago. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research LC3383.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss GA, Parkes J, Nugent G. 2020. Effects of aerial 1080 operations on deer populations in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 44(2):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morriss GA, Yockney I, Nugent G. 2019. Operational scale field testing of Pestex deer repellent 1080 cereal bait. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research LC3622.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss GA. 2007. Epro Deer Repellent for Baits Used in Possum Control. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0607/147: West Coast Regional Council.
   Google Scholar
• Northrup JM, Anderson CR, Wittemyer G. 2014. Effects of helicopter capture and handling on movement behavior of mule deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 78(4):731–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent G, Yockney I. 2004. Fallow deer deaths during aerial-1080 poisoning of possums in the Blue Mountains, Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 31:185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.C.E. 2017. Taonga of an island nation: Saving New Zealand's birds. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. https://www.pce.parliament.nz/publications/taonga-of-an-island-nation-saving-new-zealands-birds.
   Google Scholar
• Pinney KA, Ross JG, Paterson AM. 2020. White–tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) carcass survey following an aerial 1080 operation, Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 48(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Recio MR, Mathieu R, Maloney R, Seddon PJ. 2010. First results of feral cats (Felis catus) monitored with GPS collars in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 34(3):288–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro-Lima J, Carstensen M, Cornicelli L, Forester JD, Wells SJ. 2017. Patterns of cattle farm visitation by white-tailed deer in relation to risk of disease transmission in a previously infected area with bovine tuberculosis in minnesota, USA. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 64(5):1519–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross J, McCoskery H. 2012. Deer carcass breakdown monitoring: animal health board Contract report. Christchurch: Landsdowne Ventures Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Russell JC. 2014. A comparison of attitudes towards introduced wildlife in New Zealand in 1994 and 2012. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 44(4):136–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severud WJ, Obermoller TR, Delgiudice GD, Fieberg JR. 2019. Survival and cause-specific mortality of moose calves in northeastern minnesota. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 83(5):1131–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalinger DE, Cooper SM, Martin DJ, Shipley LA. 1997. Social learning an important influence on foraging behavior in white-tailed deer? The Journal of Wildlife Management. 61(3):611–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb SL, Lewis JS, Hewitt DG, Hellickson MW, Bryant FC. 2008. Assessing the helicopter and net gun as a capture technique for white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management. 72(1):310–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yockney IJ, Latham MC, Rouco C, Cross ML, Nugent G, Lightfoot David A. 2015. Quantifying short-term foraging movements in a marsupial pest to improve targeted lethal control and disease surveillance. Plos One. 10(3):e0121865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar