Effects of proximity to humans on neophilia, foraging ecology and population structure of kea

References

• Berlyne DE. 1950. Novelty and curiosity as determinants of exploratory behaviour. Br J Psychol. 41:68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GE, Ferrari MC, Elvidge CK, Ramnarine I, Chivers DP. 2013. Phenotypically plastic neophobia: a response to variable predation risk. Proc Roy Soc, B. 280:20122712. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger J, Gochfeld M. 2005. Effects of lead on learning in herring gulls: an avian wildlife model for neurobehavioral deficits. Neurotoxicology. 26:615–624. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2005.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan P, Crowell M. 2017. Visual and taste cues for minimising native bird interactions with toxic 1080 baits – a review of current practices. N Z J Ecol. 41:178–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalerum F, Angerbjorn A. 2005. Resolving temporal variation in vertebrate diets using naturally occurring stable isotopes. Oecologia. 144:647–658. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0118-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond J, Bond AB. 1991. Social behavior and the ontogeny of foraging in the kea (Nestor notabilis). Ethology. 88:128–144. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1991.tb00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverría AI, Vassallo AI. 2008. Novelty responses in a bird assemblage inhabiting an urban area. Ethology. 114:616–624. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott G, Kemp J. 2016. Large-scale pest control in New Zealand beech forests. Ecol Manag Restor. 17:200–209. doi:10.1111/emr.12227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajdon GK, Fijn N, Huber L. 2004. Testing social learning in a wild mountain parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Learn Behav. 32:62–71. doi:10.3758/BF03196007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajdon GK, Fijn N, Huber L. 2006. Limited spread of innovation in a wild parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Anim Cogn. 9:173–181. doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0018-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg R. 2003. The role of neophobia and neophilia in the development of innovative behaviour of birds. In: Reader SM, Laland KN, editors. Animal innovation. Oxford University Press; p. 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg R, Mettke-Hofmann C. 2001. Ecological aspects of neophobia and neophilia in birds. Curr Ornithol. 16:119–178.
   Google Scholar
• Greer AL, Gajdon GK, Nelson XJ. 2015a. Intraspecific variation in the foraging ecology of kea, the world’s only mountain-and rainforest-dwelling parrot. N Z J Ecol. 39:254–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer AL, Horton TW, Nelson XJ. 2015b. Simple ways to calculate stable isotope discrimination factors and convert between tissue types. Methods Ecol Evol. 6:1341–1348. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greggor AL, Thornton A, Clayton NS. 2015. Neophobia is not only avoidance: improving neophobia tests by combining cognition and ecology. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 6:82–89. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin AS, Netto K, Peneaux C. 2017. Neophilia, innovation and learning in an urbanized world: a critical evaluation of mixed findings. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 16:15–22. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunst AS, Grunst ML, Pinxten R, Eens M. 2019. Personality and plasticity in neophobia levels vary with anthropogenic disturbance but not toxic metal exposure in urban great tits: urban disturbance, metal pollution and neophobia. Sci Total Environ. 656:997–1009. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunst AS, Grunst ML, Thys B, Raap T, Daem N, Pinxten R, Eens M. 2018. Variation in personality traits across a metal pollution gradient in a free-living songbird. Sci Total Environ. 630:668–678. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson KA, Gibbs HL, Gloutney ML. 1997. Preservation of blood and tissue samples for stable-carbon and stable-nitrogen isotope analysis. Can J Zool. 75:1720–1723. doi:10.1139/z97-799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson JR. 1960. Keas at Arthurs Pass. Notornis. 9:39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Jarjour C, Evans JC, Routh M, Morand-Ferron J. 2020. Does city life reduce neophobia? A study on wild black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol. 31:123–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavčič I, Adamič M, Kaczensky P, Krofel M, Kobal M, Jerina K. 2015. Fast food bears: brown bear diet in a human-dominated landscape with intensive supplemental feeding. Wildlife Biol. 21:1–8. doi:10.2981/wlb.00013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp J, Mosen CC, Elliot G, Hunter CM. 2018. Effects of the aerial application of 1080 to control pest mammals on kea reproductive success. N Z J Ecol. 42:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp J, Mosen CC, Elliott G, Hunter C, van Klink P. 2019. Kea survival during aerial poisoning for rat and possum control. N Z J Ecol. 43:3351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy EM, Kemp JR, Mosen CC, Perry GL, Dennis TE. 2015. GPS telemetry for parrots: a case study with the Kea (Nestor notabilis). The Auk: Ornithological Advances. 132:389–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini D, Dussex N, Robertson BC, Gemmell NJ, Knapp M. 2021. Evolution of the ‘world’s only alpine parrot’: genomic adaptation or phenotypic plasticity, behaviour and ecology? Mol Ecol. 30:6370–6386. doi:10.1111/mec.15978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean LRW, Horton TW, Robertson BC, Robertson F, Nelson XJ. In Press. Reproductive roles as likely drivers of sexual dimorphism in New Zealand’s endangered alpine parrot, the kea. Ornithology. forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• McLean LRW, Nichols M, Taylor AH, Nelson XJ. 2022. Memory retention of a conditioned aversion in New Zealand’s alpine parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). J Wildl Manag. 86:22221. doi:10.1002/jwmg.22221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettke-Hofmann C, Winkler H, Leisler B. 2002. The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology. 108:249–272. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda AC. 2017. Mechanisms of behavioural change in urban animals: the role of microevolution and phenotypic plasticity. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M, editors. Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Cham: Springer; p. 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda AC, Schielzeth H, Sonntag T, Partecke J. 2013. Urbanization and its effects on personality traits: a result of microevolution or phenotypic plasticity? Glob Chang Biol. 19:2634–2644. doi:10.1111/gcb.12258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery K. 1955. The relation between fear induced by novel stimulation and exploratory drive. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 48:254. doi:10.1037/h0043788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira EG, Vassilieff I, VSl V. 2001. Developmental lead exposure: behavioral alterations in the short and long term. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 23:489–495. doi:10.1016/S0892-0362(01)00159-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols M, Bell P, Mulgan N, Taylor A. 2020. Conditioned aversion in kea to cereal bait: a captive study using anthraquinone. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 230:105077. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell CF, Dilks PJ. 1994. Foods and foraging of forest birds in temperate rainforest, South Westland, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol. 18:87–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara M, Mioduszewska B, von Bayern A, Auersperg A, Bugnyar T, Wilkinson A, Huber L, Gajdon GK. 2017. The temporal dependence of exploration on neotic style in birds. Sci Rep. 7:4742. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04751-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr-Walker T, Adams NJ, Roberts LG, Kemp JR, Spurr EB. 2012. Effectiveness of the bird repellents anthraquinone and d-pulegone on an endemic New Zealand parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis). Appl Anim Behav Sci. 137:80–85. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce G, Russell EM. 1971. Exploration of novel objects by marsupials. Behaviour. 40:312–322. doi:10.1163/156853971X00456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips DL, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL, Moore JW, Parnell AC, Semmens BX, Ward EJ. 2014. Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food-web studies. Can J Zool. 92:823–835. doi:10.1139/cjz-2014-0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell SB, Paulus MP, Hartman DS, Godel T, Geyer MA. 2003. Ro-10-5824 is a selective dopamine d4 receptor agonist that increases novel object exploration in c57 mice. Neuropharmacology. 44:473–481. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00412-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reid C. 2008. Exploration – avoidance and an anthropogenic toxin (lead Pb) in a wild parrot (kea: Nestor notabilis). (Master of Science), Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Reid C, McInnes K, McLelland JM, Gartrell BD. 2012. Anthropogenic lead (Pb) exposure in populations of a wild parrot (kea Nestor notabilis). N Z J Ecol. 36:56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruuskanen S, Eeva T, Kotitalo P, Stauffer J, Rainio M. 2015. No delayed behavioral and phenotypic responses to experimental early-life lead exposure in great tits (Parus major). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 22:2610–2621. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3498-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwing R. 2010. Scavenging behaviour of kea (Nestor notabilis). Notornis. 57:98–99.
   Google Scholar
• Semmens BX, Ward EJ, Moore JW, Darimont CT. 2009. Quantifying inter-and intra-population niche variability using hierarchical Bayesian stable isotope mixing models. PLoS ONE 4:e6187. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol D, Griffin AS, Bartomeus I, Boyce H. 2011. Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird. PLoS ONE. 6:e19535. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock BC, Jackson AL, Ward EJ, Parnell AC, Phillips DL, Semmens BX. 2018. Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models. PeerJ. 6:e5096. doi:10.7717/peerj.5096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock BC, Semmens BX. 2016. Unifying error structures in commonly used biotracer mixing models. Ecology. 97:2562–2569. doi:10.1002/ecy.1517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebbich S, Taborsky M, Winkler H. 1996. Social manipulation causes cooperation in keas. Anim Behav. 52:1–10. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryjanowski P, Møller AP, Morelli F, Biaduń W, Brauze T, Ciach M, Czechowski P, Czyż P, Dulisz B, Goławski A, Hetmański T. 2016. Urbanization affects neophilia and risk-taking at bird-feeders. Sci Rep. 6:1–7. doi:10.1038/srep28575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vince M. 1960. Developmental changes in responsiveness in the great tit (Parus major). Behaviour. 15:219–242. doi:10.1163/156853960X00241
   Google Scholar
• Weisstaub NV, Zhou M, Lira A, Lambe E, González-Maeso J, Hornung J-P, Sibille E, Underwood M, Itohara S, Dauer WT, Ansorge MS. 2006. Cortical 5-ht2a receptor signaling modulates anxiety-like behaviors in mice. Science. 313:536–540. doi:10.1126/science.1123432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weser C, Ross JG. 2013. The effect of colour on bait consumption of kea (Nestor notabilis): implications for deterring birds from toxic baits. N Z J Zool. 40:137–144. doi:10.1080/03014223.2012.710639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler H, Leisler B. 1999. Exploration and curiosity in birds: functions and mechanisms. Proceedings of the 22nd International Ornithological Congress, Durban.
   Google Scholar
• Young LM, Kelly D, Nelson XJ. 2012. Alpine flora may depend on declining frugivorous parrot for seed dispersal. Biol Cons. 147:133–142. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar