Optimisation of the MgO/Al₂O₃ ratio of high-alumina BF slag based on MOPSO algorithm

References

• Zhang XF, Jiang T, Xue XX, et al. Influence of MgO/Al2O3 ratio on viscosity of blast furnace slag with high Al2O3 content. Steel Res Int. 2016;87:87–94. doi: 10.1002/srin.201400523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma XD, Chen M, Xu HF, et al. Sulphide capacity of CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO system relevant to low MgO blast furnace slags. ISIJ Int. 2016;56:2126–2131. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen FM, Zheng HY, Jiang X, et al. Influence of Al2O3 in blast furnace smelting and discussions on proper w( MgO) /w( Al2O3) ratio. Iron Steel. 2014;49:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tang DJ, Wang YS, Wang Y, et al. Practice of lowering MgO of slag in Lai steel’s 3200m3 BF. Ironmaking. 2015;34:31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Shen FM, Wen QL, Jiang X, et al. Comparison of blast furnace slag (MgO) / (Al2O3) home and aboard. Ironmaking. 2015;34:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang QCh., et al. Research on mixture experimental designs. J Guangzhou Univ. 2005;4:381–385.
   Google Scholar
• Buddington AF, Woodford AO, et al. Temperature-viscosity relations in the ternary system, CaO-Al2O3-SiO2. J Geol. 1924;32:174–176. doi: 10.1086/623078
   Google Scholar
• Kondratiev A, Hayes PC, Jak E., et al. Development of a quasi-chemical viscosity model for fully liquid slags in the Al2O3–CaO–‘FeO’–MgO–SiO2 system. Part 1. Description of the model and its application to the MgO, MgO–SiO2, Al2O3–MgO and CaO–MgO subsystems. ISIJ Int. 2006;46:359–367. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.46.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondratiev A, Hayes PC, Jak E., et al. Development of a quasi-chemical viscosity model for fully liquid slags in the Al2O3-CaO-'FeO'-MgO-SiO2 system. Part 2. A review of the experimental data and the model predictions for the Al2O3-CaO-MgO, CaO-MgO-SiO2 and Al2O3-MgO-SiO2 systems. ISIJ Int. 2006;46:368–374. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.46.368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondratiev A, Hayes PC, Jak E., et al. Development of a quasi-chemical viscosity model for fully liquid slags in the Al2O3–CaO–‘FeO’–MgO–SiO2 system. Part 3. Summary of the model predictions for the Al2O3–CaO–MgO–SiO2 system and its subsystems. ISIJ Int. 2008;48:7–16. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.48.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Park JY, Kim GH, et al. Effect of TiO2, on the viscosity and slag structure in blast furnace type slags. Steel Res Int. 2012;83:150–156. doi: 10.1002/srin.201100249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills KC, Sridhar S., et al. Viscosity of ironmaking and steelmaking slags. Ironmak Steelmak. 1999;26:262–268. doi: 10.1179/030192399677121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar A, Görnerup M, Lahiri AK, et al. Estimation of viscosity for blast furnace type slags. Ironmak Steelmak. 2013;34:477–481. doi: 10.1179/174328107X17467
   Google Scholar
• Gan L, Lai C., et al. A general viscosity model for molten blast furnace slag. Metall Mater Trans B.. 2013;45:875–888. doi: 10.1007/s11663-013-9983-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham CJB, Richardson FD., et al. The behaviour of sulphur in silicate and aluminate melts. Proc R Soc A. 1954;223:40–62. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1954.0099
   Google Scholar
• Yang XM, Jiao JS, Ding RC, et al. A thermodynamic model for calculating sulphur distribution ratio between CaO-SiO2-MgO-Al2O3 ironmaking slags and carbon saturated hot metal based on the ion and molecule coexistence theory. ISIJ Int. 2009;49:1828–1837. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.49.1828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang XG., et al. Principles of iron and steel metallurgy. Beijing, China: Metallurgical Industry Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hou D, Jiang ZH, Dong YW, et al. Thermodynamic design of electroslag remelting slag for high titanium and low aluminium stainless steel based on IMCT. Ironmak Steelmak. 2016;43:521–525. doi: 10.1080/03019233.2015.1110920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi CB, Guo HJ, Ding RC, et al. A thermodynamic model for calculation of sulphur distribution ratio between CaO-SiO2-MgO-Al2O3 slags and carbon saturated hot metal. Chin J Process Eng. 2010;10:158–164.
   Google Scholar
• Xia LI, Ding YH, Huang BF., et al. A thermodynamic model for calculation of sulphur distribution ratio between CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO-TiO2 BF slag and hot metal. J Iron Steel Res. 2012;24:19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyadevi S, Baskar S, Babulal CK, et al. Solving multiobjective optimal reactive power dispatch using modified NSGA-II. Electr Power Energy Syst. 2011;33:219–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei F, Safavi HR, Mirchi A, et al. f-MOPSO: An alternative multi-objective PSO algorithm for conjunctive water use management. J Hydro-Environ Res. 2017;14:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS., et al. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2004;8:256–279. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Huang W, Kou M, et al. Influence of Al2O3 content on liquid phase proportion and fluidity of primary slag and final slag in blast furnace. Steel Res Int. 2014;86:550–556. doi: 10.1002/srin.201400158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng C, Chu MS, Tang J, et al. Effect of CaO/SiO2 and Al2O3 on viscous behaviors of the titanium‐bearing blast furnace slag. Steel Res Int. 2016;87:1274–1283. doi: 10.1002/srin.201500355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar