I₆₀₀ from the CSR test as a measure of pilot oven coke strength

References

• ISO 18894:2006(E). Coke-determination of coke reactivity index (CRI) and coke strength after reaction (CSR). First edition. Pretoria: ISO; 2006; 2006-04-15.
   Google Scholar
• AS 1038.21.2—1992. Methods for the analysis and testing of coal and coke, part 13: tests specific to coke. 2nd ed. North Sydney (NSW): Standards Australia; 1990; ISBN 0726259586ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• D5341-99. Standard test method for measuring coke reactivity index (CRI) and coke strength after reaction (CSR). First edition (Reapproved 2010). West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• BS 4262-1984(R2007). Method for specifying the technical quality of coke for use in blast furnaces, p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Burke LO, Grieves KR. The development of a modified IRSID coke drum test procedure using 7 kg pilot coke ovens. 14. ISBN 0867720484.
   Google Scholar
• Burke LO, Australian Coal Industry Research Laboratories. Development of a modified J.I.S. coke drum test procedure. North Ryde (NSW): Australian Coal Industry Research Laboratories; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett F, Andriopoulos N, Shi F. Determination of a theoretically based coke strength index or indices based on drum tests. ACARP Project C20009, Published 01/05/2013.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 18894. (2006). Coke – determination of coke reactivity index (CRI) and coke strength after reaction (CSR), Annex C, Page 14.
   Google Scholar
• Coals for cokemaking in stamp charged batteries at Tata Steel. Fuel and Energy Abstracts. September 1998;39(5):335. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6701(98)93539-1. ISSN 0140-6701.
   Google Scholar
• Adahama AB, Adeleke AO, Olulana AO, et al. Effects of stamped charging on the strength of coke from the weakly caking Australian agro-allied coal blend mixed with coke breeze. J Miner Mater Charact Eng. 2008;7:347–353.
   Google Scholar
• Menendez JA, Alvarez R, Pis JJ. Determination of metallurgical coke reactivity at INCAR: NSC and ECE-INCAR reactivity tests. Ironmaking Steelmaking. 1999;26:117–121. doi: 10.1179/030192399676997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakurovs R, Burke L. Influence of gas composition on the reactivity of cokes. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92(6):1220–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers JM, Cleveland W, Kleiner B, et al. Graphical methods for data analysis. Boston: Duxbury; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Díez MA, Alvarez R, Barriocanal C. Coal for metallurgical coke production: predictions of coke quality and future requirements for cokemaking. Int J Coal Geol. May 2002;50(1–4):389–412. DOI:10.1016/S0166-5162(02)00123-4. ISSN 0166-5162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyumcu H, Sander S. Stamped and pressed coal cakes for carbonisation in by-product and heat-recovery coke ovens. Fuel. 1 April 2014;121:48–56. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.028. ISSN 0016-2361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy RP, Sharma RP, Ghosh NB, et al. Coal selection and preparation steps towards improving coke quality in SAIL. 2nd International Cokemaking Congress. London. 1992;2:152–171.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Bai J, Xu J, et al. Effects of stamp-charging coke making on strength and high temperature thermal properties of coke. J Environ Sci. December 2013;25(1):S190–S195. DOI:10.1016/S1001-0742(14)60654-9. ISSN 1001-0742.
   Google Scholar
• Nishioka K, Yoshida S. Strength estimation of coke as porous material. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn [Online]. 1983;23(5):387–392. DOI:10.2355/isijinternational1966.23.387. ISSN 0021-1583.
   Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos N, Dukino R, Sakurovs R. The strength controlling properties of coke and their relationship to tumble drum indices and coal type: ACARP final report. Australia: ACARP Project C9060; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce TJ, Horton AE, Tucker J. Coke breakage behaviour in relation to its structure. J Phys D Appl Phys [Online]. 1980;13(6):953–967. DOI:10.1088/0022-3727/13/6/007. ISSN 0022-3727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amamoto K. Coke strength development in the coke oven. Fuel. 1997;76(1):17–21. DOI:10.1016/S0016-2361(96)00179-2. ISSN 0016-2361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato H. Strength of metallurgical coke in relation to fissure formation [Doctoral Thesis]. Loughborough: Loughborough University; 1999. Thesis supervisor: Professor John W. Patrick.
   Google Scholar
• Loison R, Foch P, Boyer A. Coke: quality and production. 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworths; 1989; ISBN 978-0408028707.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett P, Wimalarante M, Lauren J, et al. Implications of coking conditions on CSR, ACARP final report. ACARP Project C22039; 2015.
   Google Scholar