DIE KEUSE VAN RISIKO-DOELTREFFENDE SPILPUNTBELEG-GINGSTRATEGIEë MET BEHULP VAN STOGASTIESE DOMINANSIE-KRITERIA / The selection of risk-efficient centre pivot investment strategies by means of stochastic dominance criteria

Verwysings

• ANDERSON , J R , DILLON , J L and HARDAKER , B. 1977 . Agricultural decision analysis Ames, Iowa : The Iowa State University Press .
   Google Scholar
• BERNARDO , D J. 1988 . The effect of spatial variability of irrigation applications on risk-efficient irrigation strategies . Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics , 20 ( 1 ) : 77 – 85 .
   Google Scholar
• BOEHLJE , M D and EIDMAN , V R. 1984 . Farm management New York : John Wiley and Sons .
   Google Scholar
• BOSCH , D J. 1984 . “ The value of soil water and weather information in increasing irrigation efficiency ” . In Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics St. Paul. : University of Minnesota . Ph.D.-dissertation
   Google Scholar
• FISHBURN , P C. 1964 . Decision and value theory New York : John Wiley and Sons .
   Google Scholar
• HARRIS , T R and MAPP , H P. 1986 . A stochastic dominance comparison of waterconserving imgation strategies . American Journal of Agricultural Economic , 68 ( 2 ) : 298 – 305 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JOHNSON , F , SPREEN , T H and HEWITT , T. 1987 . A Stochastic analpis of contract grazing feeder cattle . Southern Journal of Agricultural Economic , 20 ( 1 ) : ll – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• KING , R P and ROBISON , I J. 1981 . “ Implementation of the interval approach to measuring decision maker preference ” . In Agricultural Experiment Station East Lansing Michigan State University . Research Report
   Google Scholar
• KRAMER , R A and POPE , R D. 1981 . Participation in farm commodity programs: a stochastie dominance analysis . American Journal of Agricultural Economic , 63 ( 1 ) : 119 – 128 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEE , J G , ELLIS , J R and LACEWELL , R D. 1987 . Evaluation of production and financial risk: a stochastic dominance ap proach . Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics , 35 ( 1 ) : 108 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCGUCKIN , T. 1983 . Alfalfa management strategies for a Wisconsin dairy farm—an application of stochastic dominance . North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics , 5 ( 1 ) : 43 – 49 .
   Google Scholar
• MEIRING , J A. 1989 . “ Die ekonomiese evaluering van alter-natiewe spilpuntbeleggingstrategie in die Suid-Vrystaat sub-streek met inagneming van risiko ” . In Departement Landbou-ekonomie Bloemfontein : Universiteit van die Oranje-Vrystaat . Verhandeling (MSc.Agric.)
   Google Scholar
• MEYER , J. 1917 . Choice among distributions . Journal of Economic Theory , 14 : 326 – 336 .
   Google Scholar
• MUSSER , W N , TEW , B V and EPPERSON , J E. 1981 . An economic examination of an integrated pest management production system with a contrast between E-V and stochastic dominance analysis . Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics , 13 : 119 – 123 .
   Google Scholar
• NELSON , A G , CASLER , G L and WALKER , O L. 1987 . Making farm decisions in a risky world: A Guidebook Corvallis : Oregon State University Extension Service .
   Google Scholar
• NIELSON , D J. 1982 . Evaluating alternative irrigation scheduling strategies for soybeans in Minnesota Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota . M.Sc. thesis.
   Google Scholar
• QUIRK , J P and SAPOSNIK , R. 1962 . Admissibility and measurable utility functions . Review of Economic Studies , 29 ( 2 )
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RICHARDSON , J W and NIXON , C J. 1982 . Producer's preference for a cotton farmer owned reserve: an application of simulation and stochastic dominance . Western Journal of Agricultural Economics , 7 ( 1 ) : 123 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• ROBISON , L J. 1988 . “ Stochastic dominance: a computer programme ” . In Department of Agricultural Economics Michigan State University .
   Google Scholar
• VAN DER MERWE , P JA. 1982 . Wisselwerking tussen genotipe en omgewing by grondtipe Pretoria : Universiteit van Pretoria . Proefskrif (D.Sc.Agric.)
   Google Scholar
• VAN ROOYEN , P J. 1983 . “ Graphic methods interpreting detrended results in maize cultivar evaluation ” . In Proceedings of the 5th South African Maize Breeding Symposium Potchefstroom : Grain Crops Research Institute .
   Google Scholar
• VAN ZYL , J. 1985 . “ Ekonomiese optimale mieliekultivar-seleksie onder risikotoestande ” . In Departement Landbou-ekonomie Pretoria : Universiteit van Pretoria . Proefskrif (D.Sc.Agric.)
   Google Scholar
• WILSON , P N. 1982 . The structural determinants of the swine production industry St. Paul. : University of Minnesota . Ph.D. thesis.
   Google Scholar
• ZACHARIAS , T P and GRUBE , A H. 1984 . An economic evaluation of weed control methods used in combination with crop rotation: a stochastic dominance approach . North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics , 6 ( 1 ) : 113 – 120 .
   Google Scholar
• ZENINER , R P , GREENE , D D , HICKENBOTHAM , T L and EIDMAN , V R. 1981 . Ordinary and generalized stochastic dominance: a primer St. Paul : Department of Agricultural and Applied economics, University of Minnesota . Staff Paper P81-27.
   Google Scholar