DIE METING VAN BESPROEIINGSBOERE SE ABSOLUTE RISIKOVERMYDINGSKOËFFISIËNTE MET BEHULP VAN DIE INTERVALMETODE: DIE IMPLIKASIES VAN SKAALAANPASSINGS / Measuring irrigation farmers' absolute risk-aversion coefficients by means of the interval approach: The implications of scale adjustments

Vemysings

• BERNARDO , D J . 1988 . The effect of spatial variability of irrigation applications on risk-efficient irrigation strategies . Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics , 20 ( No 1 ) : 77 – 85 .
   Google Scholar
• BINSWANGER , H. 1980 . Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurements in rural India . American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 62 ( No 2 ) : 395 – 407 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOTES , J HF and OOSTHUIZEN , L K . 1990 . 'n Ontleding van die risiko-doeltreffendheid van besproeiingskeduleringstrategieë koring in die benede P.K. le Rouxdamgebied met behulp van veralgemeende stogastiese dominansie . Agrekon , 29 ( No 4 ) : 248 – 256 .
   Google Scholar
• EIDMAN , V R . Modeling farm decisions for policy analysis Edited by: BAUM , K H and SCHERTZ , L P . Boulder, Colorado : Westview Press . (1983). Cash flow, price risk, and production uncertainty. In
   Google Scholar
• EIDMAN , V R . 1990 . Quantifying and managing risk in agriculture . Agrekon , 29 ( No 1 ) : 11 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• EIDMAN , V R . 1992 . Persoonlike mededeling St Paul : University of Minnesota, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics .
   Google Scholar
• KING , R P . 1979 . Operational techniques for applied decision analysis under uncertainty Michigan : D.Phil. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Michigan .
   Google Scholar
• KING , R P . 1989 . INTID-program Minnesota, St Paul : Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota .
   Google Scholar
• KING , R P and OAMEK , G E . 1983 . Risk management by Colorado Dryland wheat farmers and the elimination of the disaster assistance program . American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 65 ( No 2 ) : 247 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KING , R P and ROBISON , L J . 1981a . Implementation of the interval approach to the measurement of decision maker preference Research report, Agricultural Experiment Station East Lansing, Michigan State University, 26p
   Google Scholar
• KING , R P and ROBISON , L J . 1981b . An interval approach to measuring decision maker preferences . American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 63 ( No 3 ) : 510 – 520 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEE , J G , ELLIS , J R and LACEWELL , R D . 1987 . Evaluation of production and financial risk: a stochastic dominance approach . Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics , 35 ( No 1 ) : 108 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LOMBARD , J P and KASSIER , W E . 1990 . Implementering van die intervalbenadering by die bepalig van besluitnemers se houding teenoor risiko . Agrekon , 29 ( No 4 ) : 290 – 295 .
   Google Scholar
• LOVE , R O and ROBISON , L J . 1984 . An empirical analysis of the intertemporal stability of risk preference . Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics , 16 ( No 1 ) : 159 – 165 .
   Google Scholar
• MEIRING , J A . 1989 . 'n Ekonomiese evaluering van alternatiewe spilpuntbeleggingstrategieë in die Suid-Vrystaat substreek met inagneming van risiko M.Sc.Agric.-verhandeling, Departement Landbou-ekonomie, Universiteit van die Oranje-Vrystaat, Bloemfontein
   Google Scholar
• MEIRING , J A and OOSTHUIZEN , L K . 1990 . Die keuse van risiko-doeltreffende spilpuntbeleggingstrategieë met behulp van stogastiese dominansie-kriteria . Agrekon , 29 ( No 4 ) : 310 – 318 .
   Google Scholar
• MUSSER , W N , WETZSTEIN , M E , REECE , S Y , MUSSER , L M , VARCA , P E and CCJ , CHOU. 1984 . Classification of risk preferences with elicted utility data: Does functional form matter? . Western Journal of Agricultural Economics , 9 ( No 2 ) : 322 – 328 .
   Google Scholar
• RASKIN , R and COCHRAN , M J . 1986 . Interpretations and transformations of scale for the Pratt-Arrow absolute risk aversion coefficient: implications for generalized stochastic dominance . Western Journal of Agricultural Economics , 11 ( No 2 ) : 204 – 210 .
   Google Scholar
• SCHOEMAKER , P JH . 1982 . The expexted utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations . Journal of Economic Literature , 20 : 529 – 563 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TAUER , L W . 1986 . Risk preferences of dairy farmers . North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics , 8 ( No 1 ) : 7 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• THOMAS , A C . 1987 . Risk attitudes measured by the interval approach: A case study of Kansas farmers . American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 69 ( No 5 ) : 1101 – 1105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILSON , P N . 1982 . Structural determinants of the swine production industry: a stochastic dominance analysis Ph.D. thesis. University of Minnesota, St Paul
   Google Scholar
• WILSON , N and EIDMAN , V R . 1983 . An empirical test of the interval approach for estimating risk preferences . Western Journal of Agricultural Economics , 8 ( No 2 ) : 170 – 182 .
   Google Scholar
• WHITTAKER , J K and WINTER , J R . 1980 . Risk preferences of farmers: An empirical example, some questions, and suggestions for future research Risk analysis in agriculture: Research and educational developments. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois
   Google Scholar