Publication Cover
Agrekon
Agricultural Economics Research, Policy and Practice in Southern Africa
Volume 59, 2020 - Issue 1
522
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Food self-sufficiency and GM regulation under conflicting interests: the case of GM maize in South Africa

, , &
Pages 110-128 | Received 18 Dec 2018, Accepted 02 Sep 2019, Published online: 08 Oct 2019

References

  • Apel, A. 2010. The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology. New Biotechnology 27, no. 5: 635–40. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.006
  • Barker, R., and Y. Hayami. 1976. Price support versus input subsidy for food self-sufficiency in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58, no. 4: 617–28. doi: 10.2307/1238804
  • Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli, and J. Wesseler. 2011. Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-modified (non-GM) crops: are the two main property rights regimes equivalent with respect to the coexistence value? In Genetically modified food and global welfare, eds. C. Carter, G. Moschini, and I Sheldon, 201–24. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Beghin, J.C., and J.C. Bureau. 2015. The cost of food self-sufficiency and agricultural protection in South Korea. Iowa Ag Review 8, no. 1: 2.
  • Clapp, J. 2015. Food self-sufficiency and international trade: a false dichotomy. Note for the state of agricultural commodity markets. Rome: FAO.
  • Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in South Africa. 2012. Maize market value chain profile. http://www.daff.gov.za/daffweb3/Portals/0/Agricultural%20Marketing%20Commodity%20Profiles/Maize%20Market%20Value%20Chain%20Profile%202012.pdf (accessed January 4, 2017).
  • Dibden, J., D. Gibbs, and C. Cocklin. 2013. Framing GM crops as a food security solution. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.11.001
  • Ebata, A., M.J. Punt, and J.H.H. Wesseler. 2013. For the approval process of GMOs: The Japanese case. AgBioForum 16, no. 2: 140–60.
  • Eerola, E. 2004. Forest conservation–too much or too little? A political economy model. Environmental and Resource Economics 27, no. 4: 391–407. doi: 10.1023/B:EARE.0000018520.19216.2a
  • FAO. 2000. Panel of eminent experts on ethics in food and agriculture. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/003/x9600e/x9600e00.pdf (accessed December 7, 2016).
  • FAO. 2003. Regulating GMOs in developing and transition countries. http://www.fao.org/biotech/c9doc.htm (accessed January 4, 2017).
  • FAO. 2012. FAO Statistical Pocketbook. http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2493e/i2493e.pdf (accessed January 4, 2017).
  • FAO. 2014. The state of food and agricultural 2003-04. Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the poor. FAO Agricultural Series No.35. Rome: FAO. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/Y5160e/Y5160e00.pdf (accessed Jan 0.2017).
  • FAO. 2015. The state of food insecurity in the world 2015 – Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4646e.pdf (accessed January 4, 2017).
  • Gaisford, J.D. 2001. The economics of biotechnology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Goldberg, P.K., and G. Maggi. 1999. Protection for sale: an empirical investigation’. American Economic Review 89, no. 5: 1135–55. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.5.1135
  • Graff, G.D., G. Hochman, and D. Zilberman. 2009. The political economy of agricultural biotechnology policies’. AgBioForum 12, no. 1: 34–6.
  • Graff, G.D., G. Hochman, and D. Zilberman. 2014. The political economy of regulation of biotechnology in agriculture. In Oxford handbook of food, politics, and society, ed. R Herring, 664–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Grossman, G.M., and E. Helpman. 1994. Protection for sale’. American Economic Review 84, no. 4: 833–50.
  • Gruère, G.P., C.A. Carter, and Y.H. Farzin. 2009. Explaining international differences in genetically modified food labeling policies. Review of International Economics 17, no. 3: 393–08. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00788.x
  • Herring, R., and R. Paarlberg. 2016. The political economy of biotechnology. Annual Review of Resource Economics 8: 397–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095506
  • Honma, M. 2015. The TPP and agricultural reform in Japan. In The political economy of Japanese trade policy, eds. A. G. Mulgan, and M Honma, 94–122. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Josling, T.E., D. Roberts, and D. Orden. 2004. Food regulation and trade: toward a safe and open global system. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  • Kolodinsky, J., and J. Lusk. 2018. Mandatory labels can improve attitudes toward genetically engineered food. Science Advances 4, no. 6: eaaq1413. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq1413
  • Kostandini, G., B.F. Mills, S.W. Omamo, and S. Wood. 2009. Ex ante analysis of the benefits of transgenic drought tolerance research on cereal crops in low-income countries. Agricultural Economics 40, no. 4: 477–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00392.x
  • Lucht, J.M. 2015. Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses 7, no. 8: 4254–81. doi: 10.3390/v7082819
  • Lusk, J., B. McFadden, and N. Wilson. 2018. Do consumers care how a genetically engineered food was created or who created it? Food Policy 78: 81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.007
  • McCluskey, J., J. Wesseler, and J. Winfree. 2018. The economics and politics GM food labeling: an introduction to the special issue. Food Policy 78: 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.012
  • Nang’ayo, F., S. Simiyu-Wafukho, and O.S. Oikeh. 2014. Regulatory challenges for GM crops in developing economies: the Africa experience. Transgenic Research 23: 1049–55. doi: 10.1007/s11248-014-9805-0
  • Naylor, R.L., and W.P. Falcon. 2010. Food security in an era of economic volatility. Population and Development Review 36, no. 4: 693–723. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00354.x
  • O'Hagan, J.P. 1976. National self-sufficiency in food. Food Policy 1, no. 5: 355–66. doi: 10.1016/0306-9192(76)90071-3
  • Paarlberg, R. 2008. Starved for science: how biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Paarlberg, R., and C. Pray. 2007. Political actors on the landscape. Agbioforum 10, no. 3: 144–53.
  • Plastina, A. 2016. Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/crops/html/a1-20.html (accessed January 4, 2016).
  • Qaim, M. 2009. The economics of genetically modified crops’. Annual Review of Resource Economics 1: 665–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144203
  • Qaim, M., and S. Kouser. 2013. Genetically modified crops and food security. PloS One 8, no. 6: e64879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064879
  • Regier, G., and T. Dalton. 2014. Labour savings of roundup ready maize: impact on cost and input substitution for South African smallholders. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 9, no. 3: 200–213.
  • Ruane, J., and A. Sonnino. 2011. Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries and their possible contribution to food security. Journal of Biotechnology 156, no. 4: 356–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.013
  • Shao, Q., M. Punt, and J. Wesseler. 2018. New plant breeding techniques under food security pressure and lobbying. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1324. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01324
  • Smart, R., M. Blum, and J. Wesseler. 2015. EU member states’ voting for authorizing genetically engineered crops: a regulatory gridlock. German Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, no. 4: 244–62.
  • Smart, R., M. Blum, and J. Wesseler. 2017. Trends in genetically engineered crops, approval times in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, no. 1: 182–198. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12171
  • Statistics South Africa. 2014. Quarterly employment statistics. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0277/P0277December2014.pdf (accessed January 4, 2017 ).
  • Stieber, Z. 2013. GMOs, A global debate: South Africa, top GMO-producer in Africa. Epoch Times. October 19. http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/323635-gmos-a-globa-debate-south-africa-top-gmo-producer-in-africa/ (accessed January 4, 2017).
  • Van der Walt, W. 2014. Overview report of GM maize in South Africa for the 2013/14 production season. Supported by The Maize Trust.
  • Van der Walt, W., and M. Gouse. 2016. Overview report of GM maize in South Africa for the 2015/16 production season. Supported by The Maize Trust.
  • Vermeulen, H., L. Ndibongo Traub, and F.H. Meyer. 2009. Impact analysis of food policy response on household food security: the case of South Africa’s maize subsector. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, August 16–22, Beijing, China.
  • Wesseler, J., and N. Kalaitzandonakes. 2011. Present and future EU GMO policy. In EU policy for Agriculture, food and rural areas, eds. A. Oskam, G. Meesters, and H Silvis, 403–14. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
  • Wesseler, J., R. Smart, J. Thomson, and D. Zilberman. 2017. Foregone benefits of important food crop improvements in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One 12, no. 7: e0181353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181353
  • Wesseler, J., and D. Zilberman. 2014. The economic power of the Golden Rice opposition. Environment and Development Economics 19: 724–42. doi:10.1017/S1355770X1300065X.
  • Zilberman, D., B. Gordon, G. Hochman, and J. Wesseler. 2018. Economics of sustainable development and the Bioeconomy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 40, no. 1: 22–37. doi: 10.1093/aepp/ppx051

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.