Productive efficiency and farm size in East Africa

References

• Abay, K.A., L. Bevis, and C.B. Barrett. 2019. Measurement error mechanisms matter: Agricultural intensification with farmer misperceptions and misreporting. NBER Working Paper No. 26066. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• AGRA. 2014. Africa agriculture status report 2014: climate change and smallholder agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nairobi: Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA).
   Google Scholar
• Aigner, D.J., C.K. Lovell, and P.J. Schmidt. 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6: 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ainembabazi, J.H. 2007. Landlessness within the vicious cycle of poverty in Ugandan rural farm household: Why and how it is born? Kampala: Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).
   Google Scholar
• Ali, D.A., and K. Deininger. 2015. Is there a farm size–productivity relationship in African agriculture? Evidence from Rwanda. Land Economics 91, no. 2: 317–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arce, C.E., and J. Caballero. 2015. Tanzania: Agricultural sector risk assessment. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Assunção, J.J., and L.H. Braido. 2007. Testing household-specific explanations for the inverse productivity relationship. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89, no. 4: 980–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assunção, J., and M. Ghatak. 2003. Can unobserved heterogeneity in farmer ability explain the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity. Economics Letters 80: 189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P.K. 1973. Size, productivity, and returns to scale: an analysis of farm-level data in Indian agriculture. Journal of Political Economy 81, no. 61: 1370–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, C. 1996. On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics 51: 193–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, C., M. Bellemare, and J. Hou. 2010. Reconsidering conventional explanations of the inverse productivity–size relationship. World Development 38, no. 1: 88–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battese, G.E., and T.J. Coelli. 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20: 325–332.
   Google Scholar
• Belotti, F., and G. Ilardi. 2012. Consistent estimation of the “true” fixed-effects stochastic frontier model. CEIS Research Papers (231).
   Google Scholar
• Belotti, F., S. Daidone, G. Ilardi, and V. Atella. 2013. Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. Stata Journal 13, no. 4: 719–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevis, L.E.M., and C.B. Barrett. 2020. Close to the edge: high productivity at plot peripheries and the inverse size-productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics 143: 102377. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Ureta, B.E., D. Solís, V. Moreira, J. Maripani, A. Thiam, and T. Rivas. 2007. Technical efficiency in farming: a meta-regression analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 27, no. 1: 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. 2010. Agricultural policy choices in developing countries: a synthesis. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Byiringiro, F., and T. Reardon. 1996. Farm productivity in Rwanda: effects of farm size, erosion, and soil conservation investments. Agricultural Economics 2: 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Carletto, C., S. Savastano, and A. Zezza. 2013. Fact or artifact: the impact of measurement errors on the farm size–productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics 103: 254–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaensen, L. 2017. Agriculture in Africa – telling myths from facts: a synthesis. Food Policy 67: 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli, T., D. Rao, C. O’Donnell, and G. Battese. 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. 2015. Measurement error and the farm size-productivity relationship: An instrumental variables approach using self-reported land area and GPS estimates. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Conradie, B., G. Cookson, and C. Thirtle. 2006. Efficiency and farm size in Wetern Cape grape production: pooling small datasets. The South African Journal of Economics 74, no. 2: 334–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conradie, B., J. Piesse, C. Thirtle, and N. Vink. 2019. South African wine grape production, 2005–2015: regional comparisons of scale and technical efficiencies and total factor productivity. Agrekon 58, no. 1: 53–67. doi:10.1080/03031853.2018.1537190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. 2009. Economies of size in production agriculture. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition 4: 375–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edriss, A.H., H. Tchale, and P. Wobst. 2004. The impact of labour market liberalization on maize productivity and rural poverty in Malawi. Working paper, policy analysis for sustainable Agricultural Development (PASAD). Center for Development Research, University of Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2001. The state of food and agriculture. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2013. Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2015. The economic lives of smallholder farmers: An analysis based on household data from nine countries. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, H., C. Lovell, and S. Schmidt. 2008. The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuglie, K., M. Gautam, A. Goyal, and W.F. Maloney. 2019. Harvesting prosperity: technology and productivity growth in agriculture. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gaurav, S., and S. Mishra. 2015. Farm size and returns to cultivation in India: revisiting an old debate. Oxford Development Studies 43, no. 2: 165–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollin, D., and C. Udry. 2021. Heterogeneity, measurement error, and misallocation: Evidence from african agriculture. Journal of Political Economy 129, no. 1: 1–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay, Sydney, Talip Kilic, and David B Lobell. 2019. A new spin on an old debate: errors in farmer-reported production and their implications for inverse scale – productivity relationship in Uganda. Journal of Development Economics 141: 102376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. 2005. Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics 126: 269–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1957. Specification bias in estimates of production functions. Journal of Farm Economics 39, no. 1: 8–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel, E.A. 2005. Chayanov revisited: a model for the economics of complex kin units. Berkeley, CA: Departments of Demography and Anthropology, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hazell, P., and A. Rahman. 2014. New directions for Smallholder agriculture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfand, S.M., and E.S. Levine. 2004. Farm size and the determinants of productive efficiency in the Brazilian center-west. Agricultural Economics 31: 241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. 2015. Considering technical and allocative efficiency in the inverse farm size–productivity relationship. Journal of Agricultural Economics 6, no. 2: 442–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillel, D. 1991. In so many words: language in relation to the soil. Soil Science 152, no. 6: 403–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, S., and M. Fisher. 2013. Can area measurement error explain the inverse farm size productivity relationship? IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, S.T., and C.J. O'Donnell. 2015. Maize Productivity and Input Subsidies in Malawi: A State-Contingent Stochastic Production Frontier Approach. School of Economics and Business Working Paper No. 2/2015. Norway: Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas.
   Google Scholar
• Jondrow, J., C.A.K. Lovell, I.S. Materov, and P. Schmidt. 1982. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19, no. 2–3: 233–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, J.C., B.E. Bravo-Ureta, and N.E. Rada. 2019. Assessing farm performance by size in Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda. Food Policy 84: 153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagin, J., E. Taylor, and A. Yúnez-Naude. 2016. Inverse productivity or inverse efficiency? Evidence from Mexico. The Journal of Development Studies 52, no. 3: 396–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimhi, A. 2006. Plot size and maize productivity in Zambia: is there an inverse relationship? Agricultural Economics 35: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsten, J.F., and J. van Zyl. 1998. Defining small-scale farmers in the South African context. Agrekon 37, no. 4: 551–562.
   Google Scholar
• Kislev, Y., and W. Peterson. 1986. Economies of scale in agriculture: a survey of the evidence. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar, S., and C.A.K. Lovell. 2000. Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, R.L. 2003. Inverse productivity: land quality, labor markets and measurement error. Journal of Development Economics 71: 71–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Z. Feng, L. You, and L. Fan. 2013. Re-examining the inverse relationship between farm size and efficiency: the empirical evidence in China. China Agricultural Economic Review 5, no. 4: 473–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, G., S. Schönberger, and S. Delaney. 2014. Right place, right time: the state of smallholders in agriculture. In New directions for smallholder agriculture, eds. P. Hazell, and A. Rahman, 36–37. Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Lobell, D. B., G. Azzari, M. Burke, S. Gourlay, Z. Jin, T. Kilic, and S. Murray. 2020. Eyes in the Sky, Boots on the Ground: Assessing Satellite- and Ground-Based Approaches to Crop Yield Measurement and Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 102, no. 1: 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaz051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J., and J. Page. 1983. The impact of subsidies on x-efficiency in LDC industry: theory and an empirical test. Review of Economics and Statistics 65, no. 4: 608–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyanga, M., and T.S. Jayne. 2019. Revisiting the farm size-productivity relationship based on a relatively wide range of farm sizes: evidence from Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 101, no. 4: 1140–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netting, R.M. 1993. Smallholders, householders: farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimizu, M., and J. Page. 1982. Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia. Economic Journal 92, no. 368: 920–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njuki, E., and B.E. Bravo-Ureta. 2015. The economic costs of environmental regulation in U.S. dairy farming: a directional distance function approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97, no. 4: 1087–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J. 2012. Nonparametric estimation of the components of productivity and profitability change in U.S. agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94, no. 4: 873–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J. 2014. An economic approach to identifying the drivers of productivity change in the market sectors of the Australian economy. Paper Prepared for the IARIW-UNSW Conference on Productivity: Measurement, Drivers and Trends Sydney, Australia, November 26–27, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.J. 2016. Using information about technologies, markets and firm behaviour to decompose a proper productivity index. Journal of Econometrics 190: 328–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogundari, K. 2014. The paradigm of agricultural efficiency and its implication on food security in Africa: what does meta-analysis reveal? World Development 64: 690–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rada, N., S. Helfand, and M. Magalhães. 2019. Agricultural productivity growth in Brazil: large and small farms excel. Food Policy 84: 176–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rada, N., C. Wang, and L. Qin. 2015. Subsidy or market reform? Rethinking China’s farm consolidation strategy. Food Policy 57: 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, G.R. 1969. Farm size, productivity and returns to scale. Economic and Political Weekly 4, no. 26: A119–A122.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., and R. Sickles. 1984. Production frontier and panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2, no. 4: 367–374.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A.K. 1962. An aspect of Indian agriculture. Economic Weekly 14: 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tchale, H. 2009. The efficiency of smallholder agriculture in Malawi. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 3, no. 2: 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Thorner, D., B. Kerblay, and R.F. Smith. 1966. A. V. Chayanov on the theory of peasant economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Triebs, T.P., and S.C. Kumbhakar. 2013. Productivity with general indices of management and technical change. Economics Letters 120: 18–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., K.Z. Chen, S. Das Gupta, and Z. Huang. 2015. Is small still beautiful? A comparative study of rice farm size and productivity in China and India. China Agricultural Economic Review 7, no. 3: 484–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassie, S.B., G.T. Abate, and T. Bernard. 2019. Revisiting farm size-productivity relationship: New empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Agrekon 58, no. 2: 180–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. 2009. Can the smallholder model deliver poverty reduction and food security for a rapidly growing population in Africa? Expert meeting on how to feed the world in 2050. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. Agriculture for development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar