640
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Advancing dental education: feedback processes in the clinical learning environment

, , &
Pages 144-157 | Received 26 Jul 2019, Accepted 14 Aug 2019, Published online: 26 Aug 2019

References

  • Ajjawi R, Boud D. 2017. Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42(2):252–265. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
  • Anderson VR, Rich AM, Seymour GJ. 2011. Undergraduate dental education in New Zealand: 2007–2009 final-year student feedback on clinical learning environments. New Zealand Dental Journal. 3:85–90.
  • Bakhurst D. 2007. Vygotsky’s demons. In: Daniels H, Cole M, Wertsch JV, editors. The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 50–76.
  • Biggs J, Tang C. 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university. New York (NY): McGraw Hill.
  • Black P, Wiliam D. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 5(1):7–74.
  • Boud D, Molloy E. 2013. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(6):698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
  • Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Burgess A, Mellis C. 2015. Feedback and assessment for clinical placements: achieving the right balance. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 6:373–381. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S77890
  • Carless D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education. 31(2):219–233. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572132
  • Cresswell JW. 2013. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA). California: Sage.
  • Daniels H. 2007. Pedagogy. In: Daniels H, Cole M, Wertsch JV, editors. The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 307–331.
  • Divaris K, Barlow PJ, Chendea SA, Cheong WS, Dounis A, Dragan IF, Hamlin J, Hosseinzadeh L, Kuin D, Mitrirattanakul S, et al. 2008. The academic environment: the students’ perspective. European Journal of Dental Education. 12(Suppl. 1):120–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00494.x
  • Ebbeling S, Adam L, Meldrum A, Rich AM, McLean AJ, Aitken W. 2018. Oral health and dental students’ perceptions of their clinical learning environment: A focus group study. Journal of Dental Education. 82(10):1036–1042. doi: 10.21815/JDE.018.102
  • Fugill M. 2005. Teaching and learning in dental student clinical practice. European Journal of Dental Education. 9:131–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2005.00378.x
  • Haden NK, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, Chmar JE, Cole JR, George MC, Glickman GN, Glover JF, Goldberg JS, Hendricson WD, et al. 2006. The dental education environment. Journal of Dental Education. 70(12):1265–1270.
  • Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. 2007. In the students’ own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? Journal of Dental Education. 71(5):632–645.
  • Jahangiri L, McAndrew M, Muzaffar A, Mucciolo TW. 2013. Characteristics of effective clinical teachers identified by dental students: a qualitative study. European Journal of Dental Education. 17(1):10–18. doi: 10.1111/eje.12012
  • McLean AJ, Bond CH, Nicholson HD. 2015. An anatomy of feedback: a phenomonographic investigation of undergraduate students’ conceptions of feedback. Studies in Higher Education. 40(5):378–389. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.855718
  • Molloy EK. 2010. The feedforward mechanism: a way forward in clinical learning? Medical Education. 44:1157–1159. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03868.x
  • Nazir MA, Al-Alnsari A, Farooqi FA. 2019. An investigation of dental students’ perceptions about the characteristics of effective instructors and their related factors. European Journal of Dental Education. 23:286–294. doi: 10.1111/eje.12429
  • Pyle M, Andrieu SC, Chadwick DG, Chmar JE, Cole JR, George MC, Glickman GN, Glover JF, Goldberg JS, Haden NK, et al. 2006. The case for change in dental education. Journal of Dental Education. 70(9):921–924.
  • Ramani S, Krackov SK. 2012. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Medical Teacher. 34(10):787–791. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.684916
  • Rodríguez-Gómez G, Ibarra-Sáiz MS. 2015. Assessment as learning and empowerment: towards sustainable learning in higher education. In: Peris-Ortiz M, Merigo Lindahl JM, editors. Sustainable learning in higher education Innovation, technology, and knowledge management. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity. 52:1893–1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  • Spronken-Smith R, Walker R, Batchelor J, O’Steen B, Angelo T. 2011. Enablers and constraints to the use of inquiry-based learning in undergraduate education. Teaching in Higher Education. 16(1):15–28. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507300
  • Stewart DW, de Vries J, Singer DL, Degen GG, Wener P. 2006. Canadian dental students’ perceptions of their learning environment and psychological functioning over time. Journal of Dental Education. 70(9):972–981.
  • Swain M, Kinnear P, Steinman L. 2011. Sociocultural theory in second language teaching: An introduction through narratives. Bristol (UK): Multilingual Matters.
  • Thomas DR. 2006. A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. Americal Journal of Evaluation. 27(2):237–246. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748
  • Torrence H. 2007. Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 14(3):281–294.
  • Vygotsky LS. 1978. Mind in society. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch J, Del Río P, Álvarez A. 1995. Sociocultural studies: history, action, and mediation. In: Del Río P, Álvarez A, editors. Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Woolsey LK. 1986. The critical incident technique: an innovative qualitative method of research. Canadian Journal of Counselling. 20(4):242–254.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.