1,041
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Using technology-enhanced, cooperative, group-project learning for student comprehension and academic performance

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 263-278 | Received 18 Mar 2014, Accepted 21 Apr 2015, Published online: 25 Jun 2015

References

  • Abrami, P. C., C. Poulsen, and B. Chambers. 2004. “Teacher Motivation to Implement an Educational Innovation: Factors Differentiating Users and Non-users of Cooperative Learning.” Educational Psychology 24: 201–216. doi: 10.1080/0144341032000160146
  • Atherton, J. S. 2011. “Learning and Teaching: Deep and Surface learning.” Accessed March 28, 2012. http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/deepsurf.htm.
  • Ayele, K. 2011. “Adjustment Problems, Help Seeking Behaviours and Dysfunctional Coping Strategies of First Year College Students: The Ethiopian Experience.” Centrepoint Journal (Humanities Edition) 14 (2): 185–207.
  • Baker, S. R. 2004. “Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivational Orientations: Their Role in University Adjustment, Stress, Well-being, and Subsequent Academic Performance.” Current Psychology 23: 189–202. doi: 10.1007/s12144-004-1019-9
  • Biddle, L., D. Gunnel, D. Sharp, and J. Donavan. 2004. “Factors Influencing Help Seeking in Mentally Distressed Young Adults: A Cross-sectional Survey.” British Journal of General Practice 54 (501): 248–253.
  • Biggs, J. B. 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University, Open University Press.
  • Biggs, J. B., D. Kember, and D. Y. P. Leung. 2001. “The Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 133–149. doi:10.1348/000709901158433.
  • Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. 1999. “Peer Learning and Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4): 413–426. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240405
  • Cheong, C. 2010. “From Group-based Learning to Cooperative Learning: A Metacognitive Approach to Project-based Group Supervision.” Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 13: 73–85.
  • Cooperstein, S. E., and E. Kocevar-Weidinger. 2004. “Beyond Active Learning: A Constructivist Approach to Learning.” Reference Services Review 32 (2): 141–148. doi: 10.1108/00907320410537658
  • Diamantopoulos, A., and J. A. Siguaw. 2000. Introducing LISREL. London: Sage.
  • Donnelly, R. 2005. “Using Technology to Support Project and Problem-based Learning.” In Handbook of Enquiry & Problem Based Learning, edited by T. Barrett, I. MacLabhrainn, and H. Fallon, 157–176. Galway: CELT.
  • Felder, R., and R. Brent. 1994. “Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls and Payoffs.” ERIC Document Reproduction Service Report. ED 377038, 1–21.
  • Fernandes, S., D. Mesquita, M. Flores, and R. M. Lima. 2014. “Engaging Students in Learning: Findings From A Study of Project-led Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 39 (1): 55–67. doi:10.1080/03043797.2013.833170.
  • Floyd, K. S., S. J. Harrington, and J. Santiago. 2009. “The Effect of Engagement and Perceived Course Value on Deep and Surface Learning Strategies.” Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 12: 181–190.
  • Holley, D., and M. Oliver. 2010. “Student Engagement and Blended Learning: Portraits of Risk.” Computers & Education 54: 693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.035
  • Hooper, D., J. Coughlan, and M. R. Mullen. 2008. “Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model fit.” Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6 (1): 53–60. www.ejbrm.com.
  • Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jonassen, D. H., K. L. Peck, and B. G. Wilson. 1999. Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Jöreskog, K., and D. Sörbom. 1993. Structural Equation Modeling with the Simplis Command Language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Jöreskog, K., and D. Sörbom. 2012. LISREL. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Kamps, D. M., P. M. Barbetta, B. R. Leonard, and J. Delquadri. 1994. “Classwide Peer Tutoring: An Integration Strategy to Improve Reading Skills and Promote Peer Interactions among Students with Autism and General Education Peers.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 27: 49–61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-49
  • Karabenick, S. A. 2003. “Seeking Help in Large College Classes: A Person-centered Approach.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 28: 37–58. doi: 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00012-7
  • Kearsley, G., and B. Shneiderman. 1998. “Engagement Theory: A Framework for Technology-based Teaching and Learning.” Educational Technology 38 (5): 20–23.
  • Keppell, M., E. Au, A. Ma, and C. Chan. 2006. “Peer Learning and Learning-oriented Assessment in Technology-enhanced Environments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (4): 453–464. doi: 10.1080/02602930600679159
  • Kitsantas, A., and A. Chow. 2007. “College Students Perceived Threat and Preference for Seeking Help in Traditional, Distributed, and Distance Learning Environments.” Computers & Education 48: 383–395. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.008
  • MacCallum, R. C., M. W. Browne, and H. M. Sugawara. 1996. “Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling.” Psychological Methods 1 (2): 130–149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  • Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 2005. “Approaches to Learning.” In The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education, edited by F. Marton, D. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle, 3rd, Internet ed., 39–58. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
  • McKeachie, W. 2002. McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers (Vol. 11). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Neo, M. 2005. “Engaging Students in Group-based Co-operative Learning – A Malaysian Perspective.” Educational Technology & Society 8 (4): 220–232.
  • Newman, R. S. 2000. “Social Influences on the Development of Children's Adaptive Help Seeking: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers.” Developmental Review 20: 350–404. doi: 10.1006/drev.1999.0502
  • Parrenas, C., and F. Y. Parrenas. 1993. “Cooperative Learning, Multicultural Functioning, and Student Achievement.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Association for Bilingual Education Conferences, Washington, DC.
  • Peters, D., G. Jones, and J. Peters. 2007. “Approaches to Studying, Academic Achievement and Autonomy, in Higher Education Sports Students.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education 6 (2): 16–28. doi: 10.3794/johlste.62.132
  • Pintrich, P. R., D. A. F. Smith, T. G. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie. 1991. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: National Centre for Research to Improve Post Secondary Teaching and Learning.
  • Ryan, R. M., and E. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definition and New Directions.” Contemporary educational Psychology 25: 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Steiger, J. H. 2007. “Understanding the Limitations of Global Fit Assessment in Structural Equation Modeling.” Personality and Individual Differences 42 (5): 893–898. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
  • Strommen, E. F., and B. Lincoln. 1992. “Constructivism, Technology, and the Future of Classroom Learning.” Education and Urban Society 24 (4): 466–476. doi: 10.1177/0013124592024004004
  • Tarabashkina, L., and P. Lietz. 2011. “The Impact of Values and Learning Approaches on Student Achievement: Gender and Academic Discipline Influences.” Issues in Educational Research 21 (2): 210–231.
  • Topping, K. J. 2005. “Trends in Peer Learning.” Educational Psychology 25 (6): 631–645. doi: 10.1080/01443410500345172
  • Warburton, K. 2003. “Deep Learning and Education for Sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 4 (1): 44–56. doi: 10.1108/14676370310455332

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.