Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and the challenges of integrating educational robots into primary/elementary curricula

References

• Adams, J. P., and S. Turner. 2008. “Problem Solving and Creativity for Undergraduate Engineers: Process or Product?” Paper presented at the International Conference on Innovation, Good Practice and Research in Engineering Education, Loughborough, UK. http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/scholarart/ee2008/p061-adams.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alimisis, D. 2013. “Educational Robotics: Open Questions and New Challenges.” Themes in Science & Technology Education 6 (1): 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Atman, C., D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna. 2008. “Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Engineering Designers' Use of Language.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 309–326. http://search.ebscohost.com doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00981.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., and Y. Zodak. 2009. “Robotics Projects and Learning Concepts in Science, Technology and Problem Solving.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 19 (3): 289–307. doi: 10.1007/s10798-007-9043-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitti, F. B. V. 2012. “Exploring the Educational Potential of Robotics in Schools: A Systematic Review.” Computers & Education 58 (3): 978–988. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U. 2007. “Project InterActions: A Multigenerational Robotic Learning Environment.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (6): 537–552. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9074-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bers, M., and M. Portsmore. 2005. “Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 14 (1): 59–73. doi: 10.1007/s10956-005-2734-1
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M. 2008. “Professional Development for Teachers Using Technology.” In Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology, Venice, Italy, 55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, M., and B. Barrell. 2001. “Integrating Robotics into a Grade 2 Classroom: Making Space for Robert.” In Technology, Teaching and Learning: Issues in the Integration of Technology, edited by Barry Barrell, 183–196. Calgary: Detselig Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Castledine, A., and C. Chalmers. 2011. “LEGO Robotics: An Authentic Problem-solving Tool?” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 16 (3): 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cejka, E., C. Rogers, and M. Portsmore. 2006. “Kindergarten Robotics: Using Robotics to Motivate Math, Science, and Engineering Literacy in Elementary School.” International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (4): 711–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, C., V. Chandra, S. Hudson, and P. Hudson. 2012. “Preservice Teachers Teaching Technology with Robotics.” In Going for Gold! Reshaping Teacher Education for the Future, edited by Tania Aspland and Michele Simons. Adelaide: Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA).
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J., M. Carbonaro, and M. Rex. 2007. “Scaffolding Knowledge Construction Through Robotic Technology: A Middle School Case Study.” Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education 6: 55–70. http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume6/Chambers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., M. T. Battista, and J. Sarama. 2001. Logo and Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., D. Sumara, and R. Luce-Kapler. 2008. Engaging Minds: Changing Teaching in Complex Times. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Eguchi, A. 2007. “Educational Robotics for Elementary School Classroom.” In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, edited by Roger Carlsen, Karen McFerrin, Jerry Price, Roberta Weber, and Dee Anna Willis, 2542–2549. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, M. 2003. “Mindstuff: Educational Technology Beyond the Computer.” Convergence 9 (2): 29–53.
   Google Scholar
• Faisal, A., V. Kapila, and M. G. Iskander. 2012. “Using Robotics to Promote Learning in Elementary Grades.” Paper presented at the 19th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposit, San Antonio, Texas, June. http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/8/papers/5480/view
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2008. Getting Over the Slump: Innovation Strategies to Promote Children's Learning. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, M. 2013. “Robotics Intrigue Middle School Students and Build STEM Skills.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 72 (6): 12–16. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1006898
   Google Scholar
• Gura, M. 2012. “Lego Robotics: STEM Sport of the Mind.” Learning and Leading with Technology 40 (1): 12–16. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ991224
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, K. 2010. “Robotic Toys as a Catalyst for Mathematical Problem Solving.” Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom 15 (2): 22–27. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ891802
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., J. Lindh, and G. Shukur. 2006. “The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data.” Educational Technology & Society 9 (3): 182–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazakoff, E. R., A. Sullivan, and M. U. Bers. 2013. “The Effect of a Classroom-based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood.” Journal of Early childhood Education 41: 245–255. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, P., and R. Kline. 2006. “Engaging Students: A Framework Using LEGO Robotics to Teach Problem Solving.” Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 24 (1): 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Education. 2002. Elementary Science Curriculum: Grade 5. http://www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/k12/curriculum/guides/science/elementary/gr5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Education. 2009. Grade 2 Mathematics Curriculum Guide – Interim. http://www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/k12/curriculum/guides/mathematics/gr2_math_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. 2003. “Playful Learning and Creative Societies.” Education Update 8 (6). http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/education-update.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sivin-Kachala, J. 1998. Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools, 1990–1997. Washington, DC: Software Publishers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, S. H. 2010. “Relationship of Robotic Implementation on Changes in Middle School Students’ Beliefs and Interest Toward Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.” PhD diss., Indiana University of Pennsylvania. http://dspace.iup.edu/bitstream/handle/2069/335/?sequence=1
   Google Scholar