Verbal-visual preferences of working engineers

References

• Alesandrini, K. L., and J. J. Langstaff, and M. C. Wittrock. 1984. “Visual-Verbal and Analytic-Holistic Strategies, Abilities, and Styles.” Journal of Educational Research 11 (2): 728–739.
   Google Scholar
• ASME (American Society for Mechanical Engineers). 2015. “2028 Vision for Mechanical Engineering.” ASME. Accessed May 8. http://files.asme.org/ICOMES/News/15876.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Antonietti, A., and M. Giorgetti. 1998. “The Verbalizer-Visualizer Questionnaire: A review.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 86 (1): 227–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ary, D., L. C. Jacobs, A. Razavieh, and C. Sorensen. 2006. Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Baukal, C. E. 2012. “Strategy for Delivering Continuing Engineering Education.” International Journal of Training and Development 16 (4): 284–299.
   Google Scholar
• Baukal, C. E. 2013. The John Zink Hamworthy Combustion Handbooks (3 volumes). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baukal, C. E. 2014. “Learning Strategy Preferences, Verbal-Visual Cognitive Styles, and Multimedia Preferences for Continuing Engineering Education Instructional Design.” EdD diss., Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Baukal, C. E., and M. N. Crawford-Fanning. 2013. “Combustion Training.” In The John Zink Hamworthy Combustion Handbook: Fundamentals, edited by C. E. Baukal, 513–550. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. A. 2001. “How Can I Deal with Missing Data in My Study?” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 25: 464–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C-M., and Y-C. Sun. 2012. “Assessing the Effects of Different Multimedia Materials on Emotions and Learning Performance for Visual and Verbal Style Learners.” Computers & Education 59: 1273–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L., M. J. Houston, and S. E. Heckler. 1985. “Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing.” Journal of Consumer Research 12 (2): 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, D., L. Patil, and J. B. Porter. 2012. Lifelong Learning Imperative in Engineering: Sustaining American Competitiveness in the 21^st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.`
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. 2010. Applied Missing Data Analysis. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Engineering Accreditation Commission. 2012. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2013–2014 Accreditation Cycle. Baltimore, MD: Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., and L. K. Silverman. 1988. “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.” Engineering Education 78 (7): 674–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., and J. Spurlin. 2005. “Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles.” International Journal of Engineering Education 21 (1): 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. 2014. Survey Research Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, S. 1998. “The Professional Body and Continuing Professional Development: New Directions in Engineering.” Innovations in Education and Training International 35 (3): 231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, L. R., G. E. Mills, and P. Airasian. 2009. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gemici, S., J. W. Rojewski, and I. H. Lee. 2012. “Treatment of Missing Data in Workforce Education Research.” Career and Technical Education Research 37 (1): 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., and C. W. Allinson. 1996. “The Implications of Learning Styles for Training and Development: A Discussion of the Matching Hypotheses.” British Journal of Management 7 (1): 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., and R. N. Schwartz. 2011. “Effects of Pacing and Cognitive Style Across Dynamic and Non-Dynamic Representations.” Computers & Education 57 (2): 1716–1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak, M. A. 1985. “Learning styles inventory.” In Test Critiques, edited by D. J. Keyser and R. C. Sweetland, 402–410. Kansas City: Test Corporation of America.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, E. 2008. Brain-Based Learning. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Johri, A., and B. M. Olds. 2011. “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 151–185.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., and B. L. Grabowski. 1993. Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2010. “Continuing Engineering Education and Professional Development.” In Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development, 329–332. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001897/189753e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. R., P. J. Moore, and N. J. Schofield. 1988. “Verbal and Visual Learning Styles.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 13 (2): 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, P., D. K. Farkas, and M. E. Lidstrom. 2006. “Learning Styles Data and Designing Multimedia for Engineers.” Paper presented at the International Professional Communication Conference, 2006 IEEE, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kollöffel, B. 2012. “Exploring the Relation Between Visualizer-Verbalizer Cognitive Styles and Performance with Visual or Verbal Learning Material.” Computers & Education 58: 697–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutner, D., and J. L. Plass. 1998. “Measuring Learning Styles with Questionnaires Versus Direct Observation of Preferential Choice Behavior in Authentic Learning Situations: The Visualizer/Verbalizer Behavior Observation Scale (VV-BOS).” Computers in Human Behavior 14 (4): 543–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T-C., Kinshuk, Y-C. Lin, and S-C. Wang. 2012. “Can Verbalisers Learn as Well as Visualisers in Simulation-Based Cal with Predominately Visual Representations? Preliminary Evidence from a Pilot Study.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (6): 965–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa, L. J., and R. E. Mayer. 2005. “Three Obstacles to Validating the Verbal-Image Subtest of the Cognitive.” Personality and Individual Differences 39: 845–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massa, L. J., and R. E. Mayer. 2006. “Testing the ATI Hypothesis: Should Multimedia Instruction Accommodate Verbalizer-Visualizer Cognitive Style?” Learning and Individual Differences 16: 321–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and L. J. Massa. 2003. “Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive style, and Learning Preference.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (4): 833–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, J. 2014. Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School. Seattle: Pear.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelson, A., and E. Thorson. 2004. “How Verbalizers and Visualizers Process the Newspaper Environment.” Journal of Communication 54 (3): 474–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. M. 1995. “Addressing Diverse Learning Styles Through the Use of Multimedia.” Paper presented at Frontiers in Education Conference, Atlanta, November 1–4, 3a2.13–3a2.21.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., and J. L. Plass. 2006. “Individual Differences in Learning with Verbal and Visual Representations.” Paper presented at the NYU Symposium on Technology and Learning, New York, April 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Y. W., and D. Milcech. 2004. “Comparison of the Cognitive Styles Analysis and the Style of Processing Scale.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 99: 155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padfield, C., and W. Schaufelberger. 1998. Lifelong Learning in Engineering Education: A Call to Action. SEFI Document no. 20. Brussels: European Society of Engineering Education (SEFI).
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. 1971. Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Paschler, H., M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork. 2009. “Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9 (3): 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, C-Y. J., M. Harwell, S-M. Liou, and L. H. Ehman. 2007. “Advances in Missing Data Methods and Implications for Educational Research.” In Real Data Analysis, edited by S. Sawilowsky, 31–78. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Peugh, J. L., and C. K. Enders. 2004. “Missing Data in Educational Research: A Review of Reporting Practices and Suggestions for Improvement.” Review of Educational Research 74 (4): 525–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L. 2004. “Learner Preferences and Cognitive Abilities in Multimedia Learning.” Presented at ED-MEDIA 2004, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland, June 21-26, 4255–4261.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., D. M. Chun, R. E. Mayer, and D. Leutner. 1998. “Supporting Visual and Verbal Learning Preferences in a Second-Language Multimedia Learning Environment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (1): 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. 1977. “Verbalizer-Visualizer: A Cognitive Style Dimension.” Journal of Mental Imagery 1: 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J. 2001. “The Nature and Effects of Cognitive Style.” In Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, edited by R. J. Sternberg and L. Zhang, 39–59. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., and M. Watts. 1997. “The Effect of Cognitive Style on the Preferred Format of Instructional Material.” Educational Psychology 17 (1–2): 179–183.
   Google Scholar
• Rosati, P. 1999. “Specific Differences and Similarities in the Learning Preferences of Engineering Students.” Presented at the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, November 10-13, 12c1-17–12c1-22.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L., and J. W. Graham. 2002. “Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art.” Psychological Methods 7 (2): 147–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlomer, G. L., S. Bauman, and N. A. Card. 2010. “Best Practices for Missing Data Management in Counseling Psychology.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 57 (1): 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloman, B. A., and R. M. Felder. 2015. “Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire.” Accessed May 8. http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. R., and J. B. McKay. 2010. “Cognitive Styles and Instructional Design in University Learning.” Learning and Individual Differences 20: 197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2010. Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 329–332. Accessed May 8. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001897/189753e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, R., D. Link, C. Baukal, and J. McGuire. 2008. “Consider Classroom Training for Plant Operators.” Hydrocarbon Processing 87 (11): 55–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, P. 2010. Brain Matters: Translating Research into Classroom Practice. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar